Athermal Nerve-sparing During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using a Hemostatic Matrix. (AnPro)

October 6, 2011 updated by: Axel Haferkamp, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital

Prospective Randomized Investigation of Athermal Nerve-sparing During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using a Hemostatic Gelatin-thrombin Matrix

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a hemostatic gelatine-thrombin matrix during athermal nerve-sparing prostate resection compared to conventional hemostasis using electrocautery in patients with localized prostate cancer and to investigate effects on postoperative erectile function and continence.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Frankfurt/M., Germany, 60590
        • Recruiting
        • Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael A Reiter, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Axel Haferkamp, Prof.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age >18
  • Histologically proven prostate cancer ( Gleason <8; PSA<10ng/ml)
  • Disease confined to prostate in clinical examination
  • Preoperative IEEF-5-Score>20
  • Patient is able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA IV-V
  • Prior extensive abdominal surgery
  • Signs for metastatic disease
  • Known allergy against bovine material
  • Patient is unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: gelatine-thrombin matrix
Nerves-paring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is conducted without mono- or bipolar electrocautery and clipping by using a hemostatic gelatine-thrombin matrix.
Hemostatic gelatin-thrombin matrix is used for hemostasis during nerve-sparing dissection of the prostate.
Sham Comparator: Control
Nerve-sparing during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is conducted with the use of mono- and bipolar electrocautery and surgical clipping.
Mono- and bipolar electrocautery and surgical clips are used for hemostasis during nerve-sparing dissection of the prostate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative erectile function
Time Frame: 12 months
Postoperative erectile function compared to preoperative status assessed validated questionnaires.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative continence
Time Frame: 12 months
Postoperative continence compared to preoperative status assessed by validated questionnaires.
12 months
Intraoperative bloodloss
Time Frame: During surgery
Amount of blood collected in the suction during surgery.
During surgery
Intra- and postoperative complications
Time Frame: Perioperative period
Intra- and postoperative complications associated to the study´s intervention.
Perioperative period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Axel Haferkamp, Prof., Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospitals, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erectile Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Application of a hemostatic gelatin-thrombin matrix

3
Subscribe