Study of Use of Paravertebral Blocks for Pain Relief in Video Assisted Lung Surgery (ErLaPara)

Early Versus Late Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resection.

This project involves looking at the timing of providing pain relief for patients who are having lung surgery via the use of a small camera inserted into the chest with a scope (Video assisted thorascopy). This procedure can be the source of intense pain both immediately after the procedure and in the longer term leading to chronic pain problems.

Local anaesthetic placed in the paravertebral space which is located adjacent to the spinal column, where the pain nerve fibres are located, is a well recognized method of providing pain relief for these procedures. It is currently unclear as to the best timings for providing this type of pain relief with some centres placing the local anaesthetic at the start of the procedure and some at the end. Placing a high volume of local anaesthetic into this area at the start of the case may provide better short and long term pain relief than placing it at the end of the procedure. The investigators hope to show a difference between the two timings to allow for better pain relief for these procedures. This would be a feasibility study that would lead onto a multicentre trial to eventually create a best practice protocol for pain relief for lung resection via this surgical method.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients will receive a general anaesthetic for their VATS procedure with full AAGBI monitoring and the WHO surgical safety checklist will be performed appropriately prior to skin incision. Induction of anaesthesia will be standardised by using propofol and the patient will be paralysed using the muscle relaxant atracurium. The amount given will be at the anaesthetist's discretion and dependent on the patient. Fentanyl at 2.5 mcg/kg will be used at induction of anaesthesia.

A double lumen endotracheal tube will be placed so lung isolation can be performed when necessary for the surgery. Anaesthesia will be maintained using a volatile agent or a target controlled infusion of propofol depending on the preference of the anaesthetist. The patient will be positioned laterally with the operative side up. All patients will receive simple intra-operative analgesia in the form of 1 gram of intravenous paracetamol and diclofenac unless the patient is over 70 or has abnormal renal function. Extra opioid analgesia will be given as intravenous morphine and this will be titrated by the anaesthetist. The amount given will be documented as part of the trial data.

Patients will be warmed to maintain a temperature between 36 and 37 degree Celsius using a warming blanket and warmed intravenous fluids. Anti-emetics in the form of ondansetron 4 mg and dexamethasone 4 mg will also be given unless there are any contraindications.

Prior to surgical incision patients in both groups will receive 1mg/kg 0.25% bupivicaine divided into 3 PV injections between the fifth and tenth thoracic vertebrae. Only trained anaesthetists with experience of over 30 PV insertions will perform the injections. The landmark technique for these injections is as follows: The spinous process of the thoracic vertebra is palpated by the anaesthetist, a 20 gauge needle is inserted 2.5 cm lateral to this and is advanced perpendicularly to the vertical and sagittal planes until the transverse process is contacted. The needle is then walked off the superior border of the transverse process, advanced a further 1 cm and one third of the weight determined local anaesthetic is delivered after careful aspiration.

Both groups will have a PV catheter placed at the start of the procedure and a bolus given straight away. As this is a double-blinded trial the anaesthetist will not know whether the bolus is local anaesthetic or saline solution.

Pharmacy at the research site will provide the 2 premade syringes that will contain either local anaesthetic or saline. The contents of the syringe will be unknown to the anaesthetist as the label will be simply numbered as 1 and 2 to be given in order as the early (1) or late (2) bolus. If it is clinically required to obtain information on what has been given a record will be immediately available from pharmacy. The syringes will be made up as neat 0.25% bupivicaine or 0.9% Normal Saline solution. The equivalent volume of 1mg/kg 0.25% bupivicaine will be injected as a bolus.

Both groups will also receive a 0.25mg/kg 0.25% bupivicaine intercostal block at closing and an infusion of 0.1% bupivicaine will then be commenced at 20mls/hr to continue over the post operative period. Intra-operatively the amount of local anaesthetic given will be under the maximum dose of 2 mg/kg. The maximum dose will not be reached even when the infusion commences due to the fact that time will have passed.

The primary outcome measures that will be used are to review pain scores using VAS on coughing. This will start at arrival in recovery room, which will be described as time zero. It will then be reviewed at time 1,2,4,6,12 and 24 hours. The pain scores are routinely measured by the nurses after this type of surgery, the only difference for the study will be that these scores are measured more often, a timer will be placed with the patient to indicate when the scores should be taken.

Secondary outcome measures will include morphine consumption, which will be noted peri-operatively then again at the time intervals described above. These will be recorded by the recovery staff initially and then continued by the ward nurses with the support of the research team.

Other secondary outcomes measured will include cortisol levels the following day, which will allow review of the neuroendocrine response. The patient will have routine blood tests the morning after the surgery; the cortisol level will be added to this test so the subject will not have extra blood taken. Patient satisfaction scores will be recorded in the form of a questionnaire and will be recorded on the first 2 post-operative days. The length of hospital stay, readmission at 30 days, survival at 30 days and infection rates will also be noted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bristol, United Kingdom, BS2 8HW
        • United Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be recruited from patients admitted for elective VATS for lung resection.
  • Patients aged 18 and over.
  • Patient's will be ASA 1,2 or 3.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Patient unable to provide consent.
  • Infection in paravertebral space.
  • Patients who attend a chronic pain clinic on high doses of opiate drugs.
  • History of Anaphylaxis/allergy to local anaesthetic.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Early paravertebral block
The early group will have Local anaesthetic placed at the start of surgery and have normal saline placed at the close.
In this group the local anaesthetic will be injected at the start of surgery soon after incision and normal saline at the end. These will be double blinded.
Other Names:
  • Normal Saline
  • Bupivicaine
  • Propofol.
  • Fentanyl.
  • Atracurium.
Active Comparator: Late paravertebral block
The late group will have normal saline placed at the start of surgery and local anaesthetic placed at the close.
In the late group local anaesthetic will be injected at close of surgery with normal saline at the start. This will be double blinded.
Other Names:
  • Normal Saline
  • Bupivicaine
  • Propofol.
  • Fentanyl.
  • Atracurium.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score on coughing using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: 24 hours.
Pain scores in first 24 hours to be analysed using area under the curve.
24 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
Amount of morphine used in first 24 hours via patient controlled analgesia.
24 hours
Cortisol levels
Time Frame: 24 hours
Cortisol measured at routine blood tests after 24 hours.
24 hours
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 3 days (Average)
Patient's will be followed up for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days.
3 days (Average)
Patient satisfaction scores
Time Frame: 24-48 hours
Performed using questionnaires.
24-48 hours
Readmission rates
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kajan Kamalanathan, BMBS, United Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe