Evaluation of an Educational Program Associated With Exercises (EDEX) Before Total Knee Arthroplasty (EDEX)

August 29, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a standardized education and exercise program proposed before a total knee replacement for knee osteoarthritis is effective in functional recovery after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Knee osteoarthritis leads to deficiencies in muscle strength, knee range of motion and balance, and cardio respiratory deconditioning that contribute to alter abilities to perform activities of daily living. It is the principal indication for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients' functional state and pain level are generally improved after TKA and the physical and functional status pre-TKA are predictive of recovery after surgery. Decreasing length of stay at surgery departments and promoting return at home after TKA are recommended. The recommendations of the Health Authority in France (HAS) and the new law of finance for French clinics contribute to shorter hospital stays and to restrain the conditions of admission to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department after TKA.Exercise and education programs conducted before TKA could help better prepare patients for surgery, improve functional outcome and accelerate functional recovery after surgery thus reducing the length of stay in orthopedic departments and facilitate return to home (directly or after a stay in PMR departments). The type of program necessary to achieve those goals remains to be defined.A systematic review of the literature associated with an analysis of practices about the relevance of rehabilitation programs before TKA, concluded that the implementation of such programs before TKA was likely to reduce the length of stay in surgery departments and improve the rate of direct return to home after surgery but that high quality trials were lacking. It also suggested that association of exercise programs with educational ones could be more effective than exercise or education alone, particularly for fragile patients with impaired functional capacity, co-morbidities and/or social problems.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

262

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • CHU Cochin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 50 to 85 years
  • Patient suffering from knee osteoarthritis according to ACR for which a total knee arthroplasty is scheduled
  • Preliminary medical examination whose results will be transmitted to the patient
  • Patient giving his informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patient affiliated to or beneficiary of social insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients institutionalized
  • Patients who have already received an ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty
  • Patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis
  • Cognitive or behavioral disorders making assessment impossible
  • Inability to speak and write French
  • TKA indicated for other reason than osteoarthritis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual care
Information and counseling usually provided in orthopedics department and an information booklet about knee replacement.
Experimental: Educational and exercise program
  • 4 (twice a week) group education sessions lasting 30 minutes plus an education booklet about knee replacement
  • 4 (twice a week) sessions of an exercise programme lasting 1 hour

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients able to quit independently the orthopedic department
Time Frame: at day 4 post-surgery
Assessed by the ability to perform lying-sitting and sitting-standing transfers, walk 30 meters and go up and down one floor at day 4 (± 1 day) after the surgery. Each item will be scored on a 4-class scale (0, unable to perform and 3, able to perform independently). Ability to quite the orthopedic department will be defined as scoring 3 out of 3 for all 4 assessed items on the day of discharge from the orthopedic department.
at day 4 post-surgery
Changes from baseline in functional recovery
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by the area under the curve of the function subscale of the WOMAC index within the first 6 months post-surgery
6 months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in mean knee pain in the previous 48 hrs
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by a self-administered 11-point numeric rating scale (0, no pain and 100, maximal pain)
6 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in mean knee pain in the previous 48 hrs
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
Assessed by a self-administered 11-point numeric rating scale (0, no pain and 100, maximal pain)
12 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in mean function in the previous 48 hrs
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by the self-administered WOMAC function subscale (0, best function and 100, worse function)
6 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in mean function in the previous 48 hrs
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
Assessed by the self-administered WOMAC function subscale (0, best function and 100, worse function)
12 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in mean quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by the physical and mental components of the self-administered SF-12 questionnaire (0, worse quality of life and 100, best quality of life) and by the self-administered EQ-5D-3L questionnaire (11111, best quality of life and 33333, worse quality of life)
6 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in mean quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
Assessed by the physical and mental components of the self-administered SF-12 questionnaire (0, worse quality of life and 100, best quality of life) and by the self-administered EQ-5D-3L questionnaire (11111, best quality of life and 33333, worse quality of life)
12 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in the mean number of steps in the previous week
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by the self-reported number of steps monitored by a podometer
6 months post-surgery
Changes from baseline in the mean number of steps in the previous week
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
Assessed by the self-reported number of steps monitored by a podometer
12 months post-surgery
Satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by a self-administered 11-point numeric rating scale (0, not satisfied and 100, totally satisfied)
6 months post-surgery
Satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: 12 months months post-surgery
Assessed by a self-administered 11-point numeric rating scale (0, not satisfied and 100, totally satisfied)
12 months months post-surgery
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Assessed by the cost-utility ratio
6 months post-surgery
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months months post-surgery
Assessed by the cost-utility ratio
12 months months post-surgery
Adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
Assessed by self reporting using an open-ended question
12 months post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: François Rannou, MD, PhD, AP-HP, Descartes University, INSERM
  • Principal Investigator: Pascal Richette, MD, PhD, Chu Lariboisiere
  • Principal Investigator: Emmanuel Coudeyre, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

August 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Educational and exercise program

Subscribe