Treatment of the Face and Neck With Lower Ulthera System Energy Settings

November 10, 2017 updated by: Ulthera, Inc

Evaluation of the Ulthera® System for Lifting and Tightening the Face and Neck With Lower Energy Settings

Up to 60 subjects will be enrolled. Enrolled subjects will receive one Ulthera® treatment on the face and neck. Follow-up visits will occur at 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Study images will be obtained pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at each follow-up visit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This trial is a prospective, single-site, double-blinded, randomized, split-face design. Subjects will be randomized to one of three treatment groups, receiving treatment using different energy levels. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and patient satisfaction questionnaires will be obtained.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85210
        • Ulthera, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age 30 to 65 years.
  • Subject in good health.
  • Skin laxity on the face and neck

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing.
  • Severe solar elastosis.
  • Excessive subcutaneous fat in the face or neck.
  • Excessive skin laxity on the face or neck.
  • Significant scarring in areas to be treated.
  • Open wounds or lesions in the area to be treated.
  • Severe or cystic acne on the area to be treated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
Subjects will receive an increased density Ulthera System Treatment over the full face but with the energy turned down to the second highest level of four possible energy settings on one side of the face.
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin
Other Names:
  • Ultherapy™
Active Comparator: Group B
Subjects will receive an increased density guideline Ulthera System Treatment over the full face but with the energy turned down to the lowest level of four possible energy settings on one side of the face.
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin
Other Names:
  • Ultherapy™
Active Comparator: Group C
Subjects will receive an increased density guideline Ulthera System Treatment over the full face with the exception that a 4 MHz transducer will be used on the upper face in place of a7 MHz transducer, with the energy turned down to the lowest level of four possible energy settings.
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin
Other Names:
  • Ultherapy™

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjects' Assessment of Pain During Treatment With Lower Energy Settings
Time Frame: Participants were assessed for the duration of study treatment, an average of 75 minutes

Subjects' sensory response to the Ulthera treatment exposures were recorded using a validated Numeric Rating Scale (NRS,0-10), for each anatomical region treated and energy settings used, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible.

Pain scores were collected in a consistent manner, following treatment of each section of the face and neck on both sides (submental, submandibular, cheek, periorbital, infraorbital, and forehead), and for each transducer used. Split-face comparisons of pain scores obtained during study treatment by research staff blinded to the energy settings used were completed.

Participants were assessed for the duration of study treatment, an average of 75 minutes
Overall Improvement in Skin Laxity on the Face and Neck
Time Frame: 90 days post-treatment
A split-face comparison of improvement in overall lifting and tightening of skin was completed by three masked assessors. Pre-treatment and 90 days post-treatment photos from 45 subjects who returned for their 90-day follow-up visit were reviewed, assessing for improvement in skin laxity, i.e., lifted and tightened skin in the areas treated using treatment energy settings based on subjects' assigned study group.
90 days post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative Assessment of Brow Lift at 90 Days Post-treatment
Time Frame: 90 days post-treatment
Quantitative assessment and analysis of brow lift from baseline to 90 days post-treatment was completed comparing brow lift achieved using standard energy settings compared to adjusted energy settings. The number of subjects with 1 mm or more brow lift is reported. Note: Because the submental region was treated using standard energy settings in all study groups, a quantitative analysis of lift in this region between the study groups would most likely not be informative, and therefore was not completed.
90 days post-treatment
Subject Assessment of Improvement at 90 Days Post-treatment
Time Frame: 90 days post-treatment
Subjects completed a Patient Assessment Questionnaire at 90 days post-treatment by referring to their image in a mirror, their 90-day post-treatment photos, and their pre-treatment photos, and reporting if any improvement was noted on the right and left sides of their face and neck.
90 days post-treatment
Subject Assessment of Improvement at 180 Days Post-treatment
Time Frame: 180 days post-treatment
Subjects completed a Patient Assessment Questionnaire at 180 days post-treatment by referring to their image in a mirror, their 180-day post-treatment photos, and their pre-treatment photos, and reporting if any improvement was noted on the right and left sides of their face and neck.
180 days post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven H Gitt, MD, Ulthera, Inc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Laxity

Clinical Trials on Ulthera System Treatment

Subscribe