Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of the High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Lifting Lax Submental and Neck Tissue

April 16, 2026 updated by: CLASSYS Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled, Non-inferiority Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS Treatment to Lift Lax Submental (Beneath the Chin) and Neck Tissue

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-controlled, non-inferiority clinical study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS, a high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) device, for lifting and tightening lax submental (beneath the chin) and neck tissue in adult subjects.

Approximately 273 subjects will be enrolled at multiple investigational sites across the United States.

Participants will receive either the ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS treatment or the predicate comparator device, and will be followed for safety and efficacy assessments including clinical photography, investigator evaluation, and patient-reported outcomes.

The study aims to demonstrate that ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS is non-inferior to the approved reference device in improving skin laxity and wrinkle appearance of the lower face and neck.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-controlled, non-inferiority clinical investigation is conducted under an FDA Investigational Device Exemption (IDE #G250041) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS (Class II high-intensity focused ultrasound system) for aesthetic improvement of submental and neck tissue laxity.

A total of approximately 273 subjects aged 30-65 years with mild-to-moderate skin laxity in the submental and neck areas will be enrolled across up to 5 U.S. investigational sites. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive either ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS or the comparator device (ULTHERA® System, Merz Aesthetics, USA).

Primary endpoints include blinded investigator-assessed improvement using the validated Facial Laxity Grading Scale and safety outcomes based on the incidence and severity of device-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include participant-reported improvement scores, digital image analysis, and durability of effect at 8-week and 12-week follow-ups.

The study consists of two sequential safety stages (Stage 1A and 1B; 20 subjects total) followed by the pivotal Stage 2 phase (approximately 253 subjects). Data from the safety stages will be reviewed by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) prior to progression to Stage 2.

All treatments will be performed by trained investigators according to the protocol-defined parameters. Subjects will be evaluated at baseline, post-treatment, and during follow-up visits up to 6 months. The final statistical analysis will assess non-inferiority of ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS to the predicate device with respect to the primary efficacy endpoint and confirm overall safety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

273

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90004
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology
        • Contact:
          • J, MD
          • Phone Number: +1 (323) 464-8046
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28405
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology
        • Contact:
          • M, MD
          • Phone Number: +1 (704) 375-6766
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28405
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology
        • Contact:
          • G, MD
          • Phone Number: +1 (910) 256-4350
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology
        • Contact:
          • B, MD
          • Phone Number: +1 (615) 329-1110
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology
        • Contact:
          • W, MD
          • Phone Number: +1-509-343-3710

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female subjects aged 30 to 65 years, inclusive, at the time of informed consent.
  2. Subjects presenting with mild to moderate submental and/or neck skin laxity, as determined by the investigator.
  3. Subjects in good general health with stable body weight (±5%) for at least 6 months prior to screening.
  4. Subjects willing to avoid other aesthetic or dermatologic procedures (surgical or non-surgical) to the treatment area during the study period.
  5. Subjects able to understand and sign informed consent and comply with all study visits and procedures.
  6. Female subjects of child-bearing potential who agree to use reliable contraception throughout study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior facelift, neck lift, liposuction, or contouring surgery involving the lower face, submental, or neck areas.
  2. Receipt of any energy-based aesthetic treatment (e.g., HIFU, radiofrequency, laser) or injectable aesthetic treatment (e.g., botulinum toxin, dermal filler, collagen stimulator) to the treatment area within 6 months prior to baseline.
  3. Presence of any implanted electronic medical device, such as a pacemaker, defibrillator, or neurostimulator.
  4. Active skin infection, wound, cystic acne, inflammation, or severe scarring within or near the treatment area.
  5. History of keloid formation or abnormal wound healing.
  6. Known bleeding disorder, or use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications that cannot be safely discontinued for the procedure.
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  8. Subjects with a known sensitivity or contraindication to ultrasound-based procedures.
  9. Any medical or psychiatric condition that, in the investigator's judgment, could interfere with study participation, safety, or data integrity.
  10. Participation in another investigational study within 30 days prior to screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS Group
ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS (Classys Inc., Seoul, Korea) delivers high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) energy to the subdermal tissue to induce neocollagenesis and tissue contraction for non-surgical skin tightening and lifting.
ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS (Classys Inc., Seoul, Korea) is a high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) system that delivers focused energy at multiple depths to induce neocollagenesis and tissue contraction for non-surgical lifting and tightening of submental and neck tissue. The device includes both Default and MP modes and is under investigation under FDA IDE G250041.
Active Comparator: Ulthera Comparator Group
The Ulthera® System (Merz Aesthetics, USA) uses focused ultrasound energy to lift and tighten submental and neck skin and serves as the reference comparator in this non-inferiority clinical trial.
The Ulthera System (Merz Aesthetics, USA) is an FDA-cleared high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) device indicated for non-invasive lifting and tightening of lax tissue in the submental and neck areas. It serves as the active comparator for this non-inferiority clinical study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Submental Area Lift [Time Frame: 90 Days Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: 90 Days Post-Treatment

The primary endpoint of the study is the Submental Area Lift "Success" evaluated at 90 days post-treatment.

A "Success" is defined as a reduction in the measured submental area of ≥ 20 mm² compared with baseline. Both left and right lateral 2D images will be derived from 3D photographs and analyzed by certified technicians using the Submental Lift Application (Canfield Scientific Inc.).

90 Days Post-Treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Submental Area Lift [Time Frame: 60 Days Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: 60 Days Post-Treatment
Submental Area Lift ≥ 20 mm² vs baseline.
60 Days Post-Treatment
Submental Area Lift [Time Frame: 90 Days Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: 90 Days Post-Treatment
Submental Area Lift ≥ 20 mm² vs baseline.
90 Days Post-Treatment
Change in Overall Lifting of Treated Tissue on Submental and Neck Regions [Time Frame: 60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: 60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment
Percentage of patients assessed to have improvement in skin laxity (lifted skin) by ≥ 2 of 3 independent blinded evaluators comparing pre-, 60-, and 90-day post-treatment images. Images will be prepared and randomized for review per Canfield SOPs (FDA K121700).
60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Results [Time Frame: 60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: 60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment
Overall aesthetic improvement rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Very Much Improved to 5 = Worse) by the investigator comparing pre- and post-treatment photographs. Assessed by PI or delegated qualified staff at each visit.
60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire[Time Frame: 60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: 60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment

5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Satisfied to 5 = Very Dissatisfied). "Satisfied" = Very Satisfied or Satisfied.

Completed at each follow-up visit.

60 and 90 Days Post-Treatment
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain Score[Time Frame:Immediately Post-Treatment]
Time Frame: Immediately Post-Treatment

Subject-reported pain (0 = No pain, 10 = Worst pain possible) recorded immediately after treatment completion.

Pain management at investigator's discretion; if applicable, documented as AE.

Immediately Post-Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 26, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 26, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Skin Laxity

Clinical Trials on ULTRAFORMER MPT PLUS

Subscribe