Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Following an Increased Density Treatment

November 10, 2017 updated by: Ulthera, Inc

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Ulthera® System for Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Following an Increased Density Treatment.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Ulthera® System for obtaining lift and tightening of the cheek tissue, reduction of jowling, and improving jawline definition and/or submental skin laxity when increased density treatment is applied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

All enrolled study subjects will receive one full face and neck Ultherapy™ treatment. Pre- and post-treatment photos will be taken. Subjects will be required to return for follow-up visits at 60 days, 90 days, 180 days and 1 year following treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Laser & Skin Surgery Center of NY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged 30 to 65 years
  • Subject in good health
  • Desires lift and tightening of cheek tissue, reduction of jowling, improvement of jawline definition and/or submental skin laxity
  • Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated through the followup period
  • Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing
  • Severe solar elastosis
  • Excessive subcutaneous fat on the cheeks
  • Excessive skin laxity on the lower face and neck
  • Significant scarring in areas to be treated
  • Significant open facial wounds or lesions
  • Severe or cystic acne on the face
  • Presence of a metal stent or implant in the facial area to be treated, a pacemaker, or cochlear implants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultherapy treatment
Ulthera System Treatment
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin.
Other Names:
  • Ultherapy™
  • Ulthera, Inc.
  • Ultrasound treatment for skin tightening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 days post treatment
Improvement in overall lifting and tightening of skin was completed by three masked assessors, completing a qualitative assessment of pre- and post-treatment photographs. Masked photo pairs of pre/post treatment photos of each treated subject were provided to each assessor. Each photo pair was consistent in lighting, position, focus. The visit interval of each photo was NOT marked. Each assessor's review was completed independently, with no input from others, assessing the photos for improvement. If improvement was seen, the blinded assessor was to choose the post-treatment photo. Categories of assessment included Improved, No Change, or Incorrect post-treatment photo chosen. The majority assessment among the 3 blinded assessors for each subject was reported.
Baseline to 90 days post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Aesthetic Improvement at 60 Days, 90 Days, 180 Days and 1 Year Post-treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline to 60 days, 90 days, 180 days and 1 year post-treatment

Improvement was assessed based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores. The GAIS was completed based on a live assessment of the subject and a photographic assessment comparing post-treatment photos to baseline photos. The PGAIS was completed by a clinician assessor; SGAIS was completed by the study subject. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5) describing an overall assessment as follows:

  1. - Very Much Improved
  2. - Much Improved
  3. - Improved
  4. - No Change
  5. - Worse
Baseline to 60 days, 90 days, 180 days and 1 year post-treatment
Subjects' Assessment of Pain
Time Frame: During Ulthera treatment
Subjects' sensory response to the Ulthera treatment exposures were recorded for each anatomical region treated using a validated Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 1 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible. Subjects rated pain for each transducer, in each treatment region. For statistical analyses, NRS scores were averaged for each transducer depth.
During Ulthera treatment
Subject Satisfaction at 90 Days, 180 Days and 1 Year Post-treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 days, 180 days and 1 year post-treatment
Subject satisfaction was determined by scores on a patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) completed at 90 days, 180 days and 1 year post-treatment. Subjects indicated how satisfied they were with their study treatment, i.e., Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Pre-treatment and post-treatment photographs were available for viewing at each follow-up visit interval. Subjects also had a mirror available for real time assessment, comparing their image in the mirror with pre-treatment and post-treatment photos.
Baseline to 90 days, 180 days and 1 year post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roy Geronemus, M.D., Laser & Skin Surgery Center of NY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Laxity

Clinical Trials on Ulthera System Treatment

3
Subscribe