Automated Telephone Follow-up in the Swedish Prison and Probation Services

November 12, 2012 updated by: Claes Andersson, Region Skane

Automated Telephone Follow-up in the Swedish Prison and Probation Services. A Randomized Controlled Trail.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether automated telephony may be used for daily assessments of paroled offenders, and whether a brief intervention based on these daily assessments may result in a more positive development compared to daily assessments only.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To study whether automated telephony could be used in paroled offenders to perform daily assessment of variables associated with recidivism in crime and to study the effects of a brief intervention based on these assessments during 30 days following probation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Norrköping, Sweden
        • The Swedish Prison and Probation Services, Region South and Region East

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Convicted criminals subject to parole
  • Access to a mobile telephone
  • Assigned parole officer at parole

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No knowledge of spoken Swedish
  • Additional intervention such as intensive supervision with electronic monitoring, or in-patient care at a health and rehabilitation clinic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Daily Assessments & Brief Feedback
Daily assessments during 30 days after parole and a feedback intervention based on these daily assessments.
A brief feedback was given on the results of the daily assessments, including a recommendation to the paroled offender and a email report was sent to the probation officer.
Daily assessment of stress, mental symptoms, alcohol and substance use during 30 consecutive days after parole.
Active Comparator: Daily assessments
Daily assessments during 30 days after parole.
Daily assessment of stress, mental symptoms, alcohol and substance use during 30 consecutive days after parole.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental symptoms, SCL-8D
Time Frame: During 30 days after probation
Mental Symptoms, assessed with SCL-8D (Fink et al. A Nordic multicentre investigation. Part I: Method and prevalence of psychiatric morbidity. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1995;92(6):409-418).
During 30 days after probation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stress
Time Frame: During 30 days after probation
Stress assessed with the Arnetz and hasson stress questionnaire(Andersson C et al. Measurement properties of the Arnetz and Hasson stress questionnaire in Swedish university freshmen. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2009;37(3):273-279)
During 30 days after probation
Stress
Time Frame: During 30 days after probation
Daily Assessment of Daily Experience (Stone AA, Neale JM. Development of a methodology for assessing daily experiences. In: Baum A, Singer J, eds. Advances in Environmental Psychology: Environment and Health. Vol 4. New York: Erlbaum; 1982:49-83).
During 30 days after probation
Desire to use alcohol and drugs
Time Frame: During 30 days after probation
Desire to use alcohol and drugs (Bohn MJ, Krahn DD, Staehler BA. Development and initial validation of a measure of drinking urges in abstinent alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 1995;19(3):600-606).
During 30 days after probation
Current use of alcohol and drugs
Time Frame: During 30 days after probation
Current use was then assessed by simply asking whether the offender had drunk alcohol or used any drugs the previous day.
During 30 days after probation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claes Andersson, PhD, Lund university and Malmö university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 535629 (Other Identifier: The Swedish Prison and Probation Services)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Consumption

Clinical Trials on Brief feedback

Subscribe