- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01749215
A Controlled Trial of Topiramate Treatment for Alcohol Dependence in Veterans With PTSD (TAP2)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This project consists of a controlled clinical trial of topiramate treatment to reduce alcohol use and PTSD symptoms in veterans with these co-occurring disorders.
This is a prospective randomized double-blind controlled parallel groups clinical trial of topiramate or or placebo up to 300 mg per day, combined with weekly alcohol counseling, over a 12-week treatment period with a week 16 follow-up. The study population consists of 150 male and female veterans between the ages of 18-69 who have concurrent diagnoses of alcohol use disorder and PTSD. Subjects meet with research staff weekly to receive study medication, manualized alcohol counseling, and research assessments. The primary treatment outcome is the percent of days of drinking; the secondary outcome is PTSD symptom severity. Exploratory measures include assessments of impulsivity and decision-making.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
- San Francisco VA Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female veterans
- Ages18 to 69 (inclusive)
- Current DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD
- Current (past month) DSM-IV diagnosis of an Alcohol Dependence
- Level of drinking must meet criteria for "at-risk " or "heavy" drinking by NIAAA threshold (NIAAA 2007): at least 15 standard drinks per week on average over the 4 weeks prior to study entry for men and at least 8 standard drinks per week on average for women.
- Subjects must express a desire to reduce alcohol consumption with the possible long-term goal of abstinence.
- Female subjects must have a negative urine pregnancy test and must be either postmenopausal for at least one year, or practicing an effective method of birth control (e.g., surgically sterile, spermicide with barrier, male partner sterilization; or abstinent and agrees to continue abstinence or to use an acceptable method of contraception, as listed above, should sexual activity commence)
- Subjects must have a Breath Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of < 0.02% when signing informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, dementia, or other psychiatric disorders judged to be unstable.
Subjects known to have clinically significant unstable medical conditions, including but not limited to:
- Clinically significant renal disease and/or impaired renal function as defined by clinically significant elevation of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or creatinine or an estimated creatinine clearance of < 60 mL/min
- AST and/or ALT >5 times the upper limit of the normal range and/or an increased serum bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal.
- Seizure disorders
- History of glaucoma.
- History of kidney stones.
- Concurrent participation in another treatment study.
- Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
- Current Topiramate use or use within the past 4 weeks.
- Current medications for alcohol dependence (disulfiram, naltrexone, or acamprosate) or use in the past week.
- Needing acute medical detoxification from alcohol based on a score of 12 or more on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale (CIWA-AD);
- Subjects who are legally mandated to participate in an alcohol treatment program.
- Subjects who have had a suicide attempt in the past 6 months or suicidal ideation in the 90 days prior to enrollment.
- Subjects who have previously been treated with topiramate for any reason and discontinued treatment due to an adverse event or due to a hypersensitivity reaction to topiramate,
- Subjects with seizure disorders that require anticonvulsant medications
- Subjects currently being treated with another anticonvulsant.
- Subjects who in the opinion of the investigator should not be enrolled in the study because of the precautions, warnings or contraindications outlined in the topiramate package insert.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Topiramate
Topiramate capsules daily - up to 300 mg
|
Experimental study drug
Brief alcohol counseling
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo capsules daily - up to 300 mg
|
Placebo comparator
Brief alcohol counseling
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Over the 12 Weeks of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Timeline Followback (TFLB)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
Timeline Followback (TLFB) data was recorded using a calendar, with participants providing retrospective reports of daily drinking over the past week(s).
The percent of heavy drinking days per week was calculated from the calendar data.
The change in percentage of heavy drinking days was calculated by subtracting Week 0 (baseline) data from Week 12. Negative scores indicate improvement.
|
Baseline to Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in PTSD Symptom Severity as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist (PCL)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
The PCL is a 17-item self-report measure reflecting DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD.
A total symptom severity score (range = 17-85) can be obtained by summing the scores from each of the 17 items that have response options ranging from 1 "Not at all" to 5 "Extremely".
It was calculated by subtracting the data collected at Week 0 (baseline) from data collected at Week 12. Negative scores indicate improvement.
|
Baseline to Week 12
|
|
Change in Impulsivity as Assessed by Delay Discounting (DD)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
DD measures impulsivity by evaluating discount rates for delayed rewards.
On a computer screen, the participant is shown hypothetical dollar amounts that could be received immediately, while a hypothetical $100 reward is displayed continuously.
The "delay duration" is the waiting period for the $100 delayed reward.
The computer randomly presents each immediate reward dollar amount, one at a time and participants are asked to choose between each immediate reward or the delayed $100.
The same procedure will be repeated for each of the delay periods.
Delay discounting quantifies the devaluation of rewards over time, which allows for an index of overall discounting rate (k).
Higher k values indicate greater discounting and therefore greater impulsivity.
DD score change was measured by subtracting Week 0 (baseline) scores from Week 12 scores, with negative scores representing improvement.
|
Baseline to Week 12
|
|
Change in Risk-taking Behavior as Assessed by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
BART is a computerized measure of risk taking behavior that displays a computer-generated balloon on a computer monitor. Participants gradually pump (inflate) the balloon. Each pump adds 5 cents to a temporary bank. After each pump, participants have 2 options, 1) continue to pump the balloon and risk bursting it, losing all the money from that balloon, or 2) saving the accumulated money to a permanent bank. Whenever a balloon bursts or the participant chooses to bank money, they start with a new balloon. Participants respond to 30 balloons, each having a different bursting point. With each pump, participants weigh the potential gain of collecting more money against the risk of losing all money accumulated with that balloon. Greater number of pumps indicates greater risk taking. Change was calculated by subtracting Week 12 scores from Week 0 (baseline), with negative scores representing improvement and positive scores representing worsening risk taking. |
Baseline to Week 12
|
|
Change in Decision-making Behavior as Assessed by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a computerized assessment that evaluates decision-making by tracking the selection of advantageous or disadvantageous electronic cards from four decks.
Subjects are presented the 4 decks of cards on a computer screen and are told that they can win money by picking cards from the most advantageous deck.
After each deck selection, subjects are provided feedback as to whether their selection resulted in a "win" or a "loss" and the dollar amount of the win/loss.
Data indicate change from baseline in mean number of cards selected from advantageous decks minus number of cards selected from disadvantageous decks as a function of drug condition.
Change measured by substracting Week 0 (baseline) scores from Week 12 scores.
Higher numbers indicate better decision making regarding advantageous cards.
|
Baseline to Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PT110423
- W81XWH-11-PHTBI-BAPHA (OTHER: Department of Defense)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alcohol Dependence
-
BrainswayRecruitingAlcohol Dependence | Alcoholism | Alcohol Use Disorder | Alcohol Abuse | Alcohol Addiction | Alcohol Abuse/DependenceUnited States, Israel
-
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism...CompletedAlcohol Abuse | Alcohol Dependence (Primary Condition)United States
-
University Hospital, LilleCompleted
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterMinistry of Health, IsraelUnknownAlcohol-dependenceIsrael
-
Pop Test Oncology LLCBaylor College of Medicine; Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center; Congressionally... and other collaboratorsCompletedPotential Treatment for Alcohol Dependence-Alcohol InteractionUnited States
-
University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedAlcohol Dependence | Drug Abuse | Alcohol Abuse | Drug DependenceUnited States
-
University of WashingtonU.S. Army Medical Research and Development CommandCompletedAlcohol Dependence | Substance Abuse | Alcohol Abuse | Substance DependenceUnited States
-
Anders Fink-Jensen, MD, DMSciThe Novavì outpatient clinics, Copenhagen; Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet... and other collaboratorsCompletedAddiction, Alcohol | Alcohol Dependence, in RemissionDenmark
-
Psychiatric Centre RigshospitaletThe Novavì outpatient clinics, CopenhagenRecruitingAddiction, Alcohol | Alcohol Dependence, in RemissionDenmark
Clinical Trials on placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of