Improving Cancer Foci Detection in Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI/MRS (GCC 1261)

March 16, 2020 updated by: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Improving Cancer Foci Detection in Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI/MRS and Machine Learning to Better Manage the Disease

The investigators' goal is to develop a non-selective and non-invasive procedure to identify aggressive tumors and simultaneously identify their exact location in Prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy by combining multiparametric MRI and machine learning techniques. The combination of multi-parametric MRI and machine learning (validated using histopathology) can lead to increased sensitivity and specificity of cancer foci in the prostate, and help in isolating aggressive from indolent tumors. This increased sensitivity and specificity may eventually lead to: a) a reduction in the number of patients that undergo unnecessary treatment, and b) enhance current treatment options by enabling the use of focused therapies. The investigators will recruit 15 patients with prostate cancer that are currently scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy into the study. All patients will obtain an advanced MRI study prior to the radical prostatectomy. MRI scans will include a) high-resolution volumetric images using T1 and T2-weighted imaging, b) vascular images using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, c) biophysical microstructure images using diffusion-weighted imaging, and d) biochemical images using MR spectroscopic imaging. Following radical prostatectomy, a pathologist will grade the prostatectomy specimens based on standard of care (Gleason grading system). Correlations will be generated between the parameters obtained from scans and from clinical assessments.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Ummc Msgcc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

prostate cancer patients that have elected to go for radical prostatectomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All male patients that have opted for radical prostatectomy
  2. Subjects must be capable of giving informed consent.
  3. Subjects must not be claustrophobic.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with pacemakers.
  2. Subjects who have metallic ferromagnetic implants or pumps.
  3. All females are excluded from this study.
  4. Subjects with kidney disease of any severity or on hemodialysis.
  5. Subjects with known allergies to gadolinium-based contrast agents.
  6. Subjects incapable of lying on their backs for up to an hour at a time.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Objective: distinguishing high-grade tumors vs. low-grade tumors and normal prostate
Time Frame: 16 months

Whether advanced MR imaging techniques can be used to train machine-learning techniques to distinguish high-grade tumors from low-grade tumors and normal prostate. The machine-learning techniques will be trained using histopathology data as the ground truth.

To achieve this we will obtain volumetric images of the various tissue attributes (listed below) and match them to histopathology:

  • Vascular permeability (ktrans) using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI)
  • Morphological changes captured using T2 and diffusion changes using diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI)
  • Metabolic signatures of (choline+creatine)/citrate) or CC/C using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI)
  • Correlate in vivo imaging findings to ex vivo histopathology using deformable image registration
  • Develop a multiclass support vector machine (SVM) using the set of multi-parametric images as input, and use it predict a score akin to the Gleason score.
16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Objective: non-invasive and quantitative test to accurately identify the tumor grade and location.
Time Frame: 16 months
Advanced MR imaging techniques can be used alone in classifying tumor grade. Datasets collected will be partitioned into subsets that will be used for testing the machine learning techniques. For example: 90% of the data will be used for training and the remaining 10% will be used for testing. This process will be repeated over a combination of different subsets. Our hypothesis is that Machine Learning methods will assist in analyzing the differences between aggressive tumors, indolent tumors, and normal tissue. We further hypothesize this analysis will help in synthesizing an imaging-based "score" that can identify an aggressive tumor from indolent tumors and normal tissue in new cases after training. We believe using multi-parametric MRI combined with an advanced machine learning technique can improve the sensitivity and specificity of tumor foci detection. This will result in a non-invasive and quantitative test to accurately identify the tumor grade and location.
16 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Warren D'Souza, PhD, UMD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

3
Subscribe