Accuracy of TCD Monitoring in Predicting Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Endarterectomy

February 25, 2013 updated by: Liu Bao, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Velocity Systolic Blood Pressure Index in Accurately Predicting Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Endarterectomy

Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a life threatening complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the changes of middle cerebral artery velocity are used to predict the occurrence of CHS but the accuracy is limited. In addition, changes of BP post-operatively comparing with baseline BP should be a predictive factor of CHS.

Objective: The investigators aimed to create a predictive index, velocity systolic blood pressure index (VSI), for improving the predictive power of Transcranial Doppler monitoring regarding CHS.

Methods: The study design is a diagnostic test, which is an observational analytic clinical study. From March 2013 to September 2014, 200 patients will be recruited. Patients will be classified according to the CHS occurrence. VSI combined the changes of middle cerebral artery velocity and blood pressure crossing CEA and the intra- and post-operative increase ratios of middle cerebral artery velocity were calculated. Their prediction power of CHS will be compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of them will be calculated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis will be performed.

Expected Outcomes: Comparing with the commonly used intra-operative and post-operative TCD monitoring, VSI may be more useful to select CHS in patients who underwent CEA. As far as the investigators know, analysis or studies combining the BP and velocity changes in the prediction of CHS have never been performed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a standard diagnostic test. It is designed to verify the predictive power of VSI with CHS, and which is an observational analytic clinical study. The investigative parameters of patients will be collected prospectively by the designed case report form. According to the incidence of CHS, the estimated enrollment amount is set as 200. Patients will be recruited by the inclusion and exclusion criteria below. All the patients included will accept the standard CEA surgery treatment in the department of vascular surgery of PUMCH. MCAV and systolic BP data will be recorded cross CEA. Post-operatively the CHS patients will be identified according to the golden standard. The golden standard is the clinical diagnose of CHS (the detailed diagnostic criteria will be stated in the methodology part). The TCD operator is blind to the patients. The predictive power of VSI will be identified by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC plot comparing with the golden standard. The study start date is March 2013, the estimated study completion date is December 2014 and the primary completion date is September 2014 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • vascular surgery department of PUMCH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who with carotid stenosis will accept CEA in PUMCH from March 2013 to September 2014.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age from 30 to 85 years;
  2. Had a middle-grade symptomatic carotid stenosis (more than 50%) or a high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis (more than 70%);
  3. Underwent CEA 30 days after the last ischemic cerebrovascular event in the case of symptomatic carotid stenosis;
  4. Signed the ethical information consent form
  5. Underwent TCD study intraoperative and immediately after CEA;
  6. The degree of carotid stenosis will be assessed by CT angiography or cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA). (The method document came from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial study.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency CEA within 30 days of stroke onset in the case of symptomatic carotid stenosis;
  2. No temporal windows to measure the MCAV.
  3. Restenosis after CEA or CAS
  4. Stenosis caused by non-atherosclerotic diseases
  5. Combined severe systematic diseases that markedly decrease the life cycle
  6. Allergy to medicines of the study such as Aspirin or Statin
  7. Refuse to sign the ethical information consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
CHS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome
Time Frame: within 7 days after surgery
CHS will be diagnosed if (1) the patient developed symptoms that ipsilateral moderate or severe headache, confusion, seizures, intracranial hemorrhage or focal neurological deficits after a symptom-free interval. (2) symptoms not secondary to cerebral ischemia which will be excluded by CT or MRI. (3) MCAV increasing >100% from baseline which identified by TCD. (4) within 7 days after surgery. (5) An independent neurologist made the diagnosis of CHS.
within 7 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PUMCH-20130113
  • B2009B080 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Central Committee of China health care Administration)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carotid Stenosis

Subscribe