Simplified Medical Abortion in Rural India

August 13, 2014 updated by: Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Karolinska Institutet
It is estimated that around 50 000 women die every year due to consequences of unsafe abortion (Singh et al, 2009). A majority of these deaths occur in low-income countries where access to safe abortion care is limited. Unplanned pregnancy and unsafe abortion thus place a huge burden on scarce medical resources. Any improvement in Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC) would mean important improvements for the concerned women and their families (Singh, 2006) as well as for the societies at large. Recommended improvements concern increased access to the safest and most cost-effective methods such as medical abortion provided at primary level facilities (Singh et al, 2009). A Cochrane Review concludes that most randomised controlled trials within the field of medical abortion are conducted in high-income settings with good access to emergency health care services (Kulier et al, 2004). A simplified regime for medical abortion, which could be used at primary level facilities, would contribute to the reduction of maternal mortality and morbidity related to unsafe abortions globally. However, there is a knowledge gap in order to determine if a simplified follow up of medical abortion is equally effective as the standard procedure in a low-income setting. The results will provide evidence-based information to be used in revising training and service delivery guidelines' in order to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity in both low and high-income setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

731

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rajasthan
      • Udaipur, Rajasthan, India, 313001
        • ARTH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women presenting with a positive urine test and uterine size equivalent to or up to 9 +0 weeks (63 days) of gestation
  • opting for medical abortion and
  • residing in an area where follow-up is feasible.
  • woman agrees for a follow up contact at 10-14 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women with contraindications to medical abortions,
  • haemoglobin level less than 85 (Hb < 85) and
  • age less than 18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Duo test
Self assessment
Intervention group: Simplified followup Mifepristone at outpatient clinic, followed by the administration of misoprostol 24-48 hours later (in the clinic or at home). The women will not return to the clinic for routine follow up visit, but are given instructions on how to use a checklist and a low sensitivity pregnancy test around day 10-14. They are asked only to return if they have any health problems or screen positively. The low sensitivity urinary-hCG (with HCG of 1000 IU/ml) test will be used. Women will be provided the pregnancy test free of cost along with a pictorial checklist. A research assistant or a nurse will explain in detail how to use the pregnancy test as well as the checklist, and provide phone numbers in case of any questions or doubts. Follow-up interviews will be conducted through home visits or phone (if woman has one) during the next 1-2 days to screen for on-going pregnancies and assess acceptability the self-assessment.
Other Names:
  • Duo test
Other: Routine follow up
Follow up in the clinic
Follow up in the clinic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy
Time Frame: At 10-14 days follow up
efficacy of self-assessment, measured as the rate of complete abortion, relative to routine follow up . The percentage of women requiring surgical intervention, extra visits and administration of additional misoprostol will be used to monitor incomplete abortion.
At 10-14 days follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety
Time Frame: Up to 10-14 days Follow Up
unscheduled visits for various adverse events/complications, side effects of medical abortion including infections, bleeding, pain
Up to 10-14 days Follow Up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
contraceptive uptake
Time Frame: at approx. 2 weeks after abortion (at FU)
Number of women who have started a contraceptive method or is planning to start a method
at approx. 2 weeks after abortion (at FU)
time consumption
Time Frame: at 10-14 days Follow Up
Time spent for clinical visits/contacts
at 10-14 days Follow Up
Acceptability
Time Frame: at 10-14 days follow up
Acceptability (evaluated by a questionnaire)of home self assessment of complete pregnancy using a low sensitivity u-hCG test
at 10-14 days follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharad Iyengar, MD, ARTH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WDuo2013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Self assessment

Subscribe