- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01827995
Simplified Medical Abortion in Rural India
August 13, 2014 updated by: Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Karolinska Institutet
It is estimated that around 50 000 women die every year due to consequences of unsafe abortion (Singh et al, 2009).
A majority of these deaths occur in low-income countries where access to safe abortion care is limited.
Unplanned pregnancy and unsafe abortion thus place a huge burden on scarce medical resources.
Any improvement in Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC) would mean important improvements for the concerned women and their families (Singh, 2006) as well as for the societies at large.
Recommended improvements concern increased access to the safest and most cost-effective methods such as medical abortion provided at primary level facilities (Singh et al, 2009).
A Cochrane Review concludes that most randomised controlled trials within the field of medical abortion are conducted in high-income settings with good access to emergency health care services (Kulier et al, 2004).
A simplified regime for medical abortion, which could be used at primary level facilities, would contribute to the reduction of maternal mortality and morbidity related to unsafe abortions globally.
However, there is a knowledge gap in order to determine if a simplified follow up of medical abortion is equally effective as the standard procedure in a low-income setting.
The results will provide evidence-based information to be used in revising training and service delivery guidelines' in order to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity in both low and high-income setting.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
731
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Rajasthan
-
Udaipur, Rajasthan, India, 313001
- ARTH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women presenting with a positive urine test and uterine size equivalent to or up to 9 +0 weeks (63 days) of gestation
- opting for medical abortion and
- residing in an area where follow-up is feasible.
- woman agrees for a follow up contact at 10-14 days.
Exclusion Criteria:
- women with contraindications to medical abortions,
- haemoglobin level less than 85 (Hb < 85) and
- age less than 18 years.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Duo test
Self assessment
|
Intervention group: Simplified followup Mifepristone at outpatient clinic, followed by the administration of misoprostol 24-48 hours later (in the clinic or at home).
The women will not return to the clinic for routine follow up visit, but are given instructions on how to use a checklist and a low sensitivity pregnancy test around day 10-14.
They are asked only to return if they have any health problems or screen positively.
The low sensitivity urinary-hCG (with HCG of 1000 IU/ml) test will be used.
Women will be provided the pregnancy test free of cost along with a pictorial checklist.
A research assistant or a nurse will explain in detail how to use the pregnancy test as well as the checklist, and provide phone numbers in case of any questions or doubts.
Follow-up interviews will be conducted through home visits or phone (if woman has one) during the next 1-2 days to screen for on-going pregnancies and assess acceptability the self-assessment.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Routine follow up
Follow up in the clinic
|
Follow up in the clinic
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy
Time Frame: At 10-14 days follow up
|
efficacy of self-assessment, measured as the rate of complete abortion, relative to routine follow up .
The percentage of women requiring surgical intervention, extra visits and administration of additional misoprostol will be used to monitor incomplete abortion.
|
At 10-14 days follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety
Time Frame: Up to 10-14 days Follow Up
|
unscheduled visits for various adverse events/complications, side effects of medical abortion including infections, bleeding, pain
|
Up to 10-14 days Follow Up
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
contraceptive uptake
Time Frame: at approx. 2 weeks after abortion (at FU)
|
Number of women who have started a contraceptive method or is planning to start a method
|
at approx. 2 weeks after abortion (at FU)
|
|
time consumption
Time Frame: at 10-14 days Follow Up
|
Time spent for clinical visits/contacts
|
at 10-14 days Follow Up
|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: at 10-14 days follow up
|
Acceptability (evaluated by a questionnaire)of home self assessment of complete pregnancy using a low sensitivity u-hCG test
|
at 10-14 days follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sharad Iyengar, MD, ARTH
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Paul M, Iyengar SD, Essen B, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Iyengar K, Bring J, Klingberg-Allvin M. Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 17;16(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3726-1.
- Paul M, Iyengar K, Essen B, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Iyengar SD, Bring J, Soni S, Klingberg-Allvin M. Acceptability of Home-Assessment Post Medical Abortion and Medical Abortion in a Low-Resource Setting in Rajasthan, India. Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0133354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133354. eCollection 2015.
- Iyengar K, Paul M, Iyengar SD, Klingberg-Allvin M, Essen B, Bring J, Soni S, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Sep;3(9):e537-45. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00150-3.
- Paul M, Iyengar K, Iyengar S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Essen B, Klingberg-Allvin M. Simplified follow-up after medical abortion using a low-sensitivity urinary pregnancy test and a pictorial instruction sheet in Rajasthan, India--study protocol and intervention adaptation of a randomised control trial. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Aug 15;14:98. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-98.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 5, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
April 10, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
August 15, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 13, 2014
Last Verified
August 1, 2014
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- WDuo2013
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pregnancy
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompletedCornual PregnancyTaiwan
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalPeking Union Medical CollegeUnknownPregnancy | Pregnancy Related | Infant | Pregnancy Disease | Risk FactorChina
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityNot yet recruitingEctopic PregnancyEgypt
-
Meir Medical CenterRecruiting
-
Bagcilar Training and Research HospitalRecruitingEctopic PregnancyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
MELISA Institute Genomics & Proteomics Research...RecruitingHealthy | Pregnancy | Early Pregnancy | Early Pregnancy Loss | ChildbirthChile
-
Ufuk UniversityNot yet recruitingPregnancy Complications | Pregnancy Loss | Pregnancy Preterm
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Turku University HospitalUniversity of TurkuCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompletedProlonged PregnancyFrance
Clinical Trials on Self assessment
-
JanuelUnknown
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital Center of MartiniqueNot yet recruitingGeriatric Assessment | Patients Over 65 Years OldMartinique
-
University Hospital Center of MartiniqueSaint-Gregoire Private Hospital Center; Lariboisière HospitalRecruitingCoxofemoral PathologiesFrance, Martinique
-
University Hospital of FerraraCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedVitiligo | PHOTOPROTECTION | SUN-EXPOSITION | FITZPATRICK SCALEFrance
-
University Hospital Center of MartiniqueCompletedDiabetes Mellitus | Diabetes | Diabetes Complications | Foot Ulcer, DiabeticFrance
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruiting
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesRecruiting