Verbal and Written Instruction Versus Verbal and Written Plus Simulation in Patients With Breast Cancer and Their Caregivers

September 3, 2015 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

A Comparison of Strategies for Injection Teaching: Verbal and Written Instruction Versus Verbal and Written Plus Simulation in Patients With Breast Cancer and Their Caregivers

The purpose of this study is to compare two different ways of teaching people how to give injections at home. The first is what we do now, which is teaching patients and/or their caregivers verbally and by giving written instructions. The second is what we do now (verbal and written instructions) along with a demonstration and practice using a needle and an injection pad that feels similar to skin and fat. This is being done to find the best method for teaching people to give an injection at home.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All breast cancer medical oncology clinics at MSKCC will serve as recruitment clinics for the proposed study. Nurses will notify the PI of any patient due to start adjuvantadjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment when the regimen includes pegfilgrastim.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Over 18 years of age
  • No history of performing injections
  • Patient must be receiving pegfilgrastim during adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Patient will have the pegfilgrastim administered at home either by self administering or by a caregiver.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or caregiver desire to inject (with saline) during or immediately following the injection teaching
  • Prior self-injection or injection administration experience of any type
  • Patients with history of anaphylaxis or other severe reactions to latex
  • Patients that required pegfilgrastim injection be administered in clinic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
control injection teaching
The first 25 subjects recruited into the study will be that control group. Subjects accrued during the control phase will receive the control injection teaching, which at MSKCC is verbal instruction. To minimize practice variation, the teaching will be provided by the office-practice nurse guided by a verbal script. The consented subjects will complete a questionnaire before the teaching, immediately after the teaching, and after performing the injection the following day. The nurse who administered the teaching will also complete an evaluation immediately following the teaching.

Pre-teaching Evaluation: Patient

  • Pre-teaching Evaluation: Caregiver

    o To be completed immediately before the teaching. Administered by the nurse who will provide the teaching. The form utilized will depend on if the patient or caregiver will be administering the injection.

  • Post-teaching Evaluation: Patient Post-teaching Evaluation: Caregiver To be completed immediately after the teaching. Administered by the nurse who provided the teaching. The form utilized will depend on if the patient or caregiver will be administering the injection.
intervention group
The subsequent 25 subjects enrolled into the study will be in the intervention group. Subjects accrued during the intervention phase will receive the verbal and written injection teaching, plus demonstration and return demonstration using an injection model. It is anticipated that the intervention teaching will take no longer then 5 additional minutes, however time will be evaluated as a secondary objective as well in both groups. The consented subjects will complete a questionnaire before the teaching, immediately after the teaching, and after performing the injection the following day. The nurse who administered the teaching will also complete an evaluation immediately following the teaching.

Post-injection Evaluation: Patient

  • Post-injection Evaluation: Caregiver

    o To be completed after the injection is administered (outside of MSKCC) by the patient or caregiver. The form utilized will depend on if the patient or caregiver has administered the injection. They will return this evaluation at the patient's next visit (2 weeks later).

  • Nurse Evaluation: Control
  • Nurse Evaluation: Model o To be completed immediately following the completion of the teaching by the nurse. The form utilized will depend on if the teaching was part of the control or intervention phase of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
compare verbal and written teaching for injection teaching
Time Frame: 1 year

with verbal and written teaching + simulation using an injection model, in terms of:

  • Patient/caregiver satisfaction
  • Patient/caregiver self-confidence
  • Nurse satisfaction
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess for changes in patient self-reported
Time Frame: 1 year
worry about injection before and after the injection teaching
1 year
Compare nurses' perceptions of patient/caregiver confidence levels
Time Frame: 1 year
after injection teaching to actual patient/caregiver reported confidence levels
1 year
Compare the amount of nurses' time spent teaching
Time Frame: 1 year
between the teaching modalities
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erica Fischer-Cartlidge, RN, MSN, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13-057

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Verbal and Written Instruction

Subscribe