A Prospective, Randomized Trial of BVS Veruss EES in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting for Myocardial Infarction (ISAR-Absorb MI)

July 6, 2018 updated by: Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Intracoronary Scaffold Assessment a Randomised Evaluation of Absorb in Myocardial Infarction (ISAR-Absorb MI) A Prospective, Randomized Trial of BVS Veruss EES in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting for Myocardial Infarction

The aim of the current study is to test the clinical performance of the everolimus-eluting BVS compared with that of the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients undergoing PCI in the setting of acute MI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation currently represents the dominant treatment strategy in patients undergoing catheter intervention. However effective neointimal suppression occurs at the cost of a systematic delay in arterial healing in comparison with after bare metal stenting. This underlies a small but significant increased risk of stent thrombosis after DES implantation in comparison with bare metal stent implantation as well as a possible excess of in-stent neoatheroma formation.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent an innovative technology providing short-term vessel scaffolding and drug delivery without the long-term limitations of metallic DES and durable polymer coatings. Potential benefits include restoration of normal vasomotor reactivity, facilitation of positive vessel wall remodelling and facilitation of subsequent bypass grafting of the stented arterial segment. In addition preliminary reports suggest that the process of scaffold biodegradation may promote formation of a cohesive tissue layer covering and stabilizing the underlying atherosclerotic plaque - a so-called plaque-sealing effect. Although initial results with BVS are encouraging, there is a lack of randomized clinical trial data and no data exists for outcomes after BVS implantation in patients undergoing coronary stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI).

The aim of the current study is to test the clinical performance of the everolimus-eluting BVS compared with that of the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients undergoing PCI in the setting of acute MI. The primary endpoint will be percentage diameter stenosis at protocol-mandated 6-8 month angiographic follow-up. Sample size calculation is based on a non-inferiority assumption in relation to the BVS versus EES. It is planned to enrol a total of 260 patients. Subsequent clinical follow-up will be undertaken out to 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

262

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
        • Klinikum rechts der Isar
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 80636
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years or older with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non ST-elevation myocardial infarction with angiographically confirmed thrombus
  2. Planned stent implantation in de novo lesions in native vessels or coronary bypass grafts with reference vessel diameter ≥2.5 mm and ≤3.9 mm
  3. Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study
  4. In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target lesion located in the left main trunk
  2. Severely calcified lesions
  3. Bifurcation lesions with side branch diameter > 2mm
  4. In-stent restenosis
  5. Contraindications to antiplatelet therapy, cobalt chrome, everolimus, polylactic acid
  6. Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance
  7. Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
  8. Previous enrolment in this trial
  9. Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS)
Other Names:
  • ABSORB
Active Comparator: Everolimus-eluting stent
Durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES)
Other Names:
  • Xience

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Diameter Stenosis
Time Frame: 6-8 months
Percentage diameter stenosis at coronary angiography at 6-8 months follow-up
6-8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device-oriented composite endpoint
Time Frame: 12 months
Composite of cardiac death/target vessel-myocardial infarction (MI)/ target lesion revascularization (TLR)
12 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint
Time Frame: 12 months
The composite of death/any MI/all revascularization
12 months
Composite of death or MI
Time Frame: 12 months
The composite of cardiovascular death or MI
12 months
Stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 12 months
The incidence of scaffold or stent thrombosis
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert A Byrne, MB PhD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Bioresorbable vascular scaffold

3
Subscribe