Sitagliptin Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

October 6, 2016 updated by: Rohit Loomba, University of California, San Diego
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents a spectrum of diseases ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis and liver-related mortality in persons who drink little or no alcohol. NAFLD is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis with no evidence of hepatocellular injury in the form of ballooning of the hepatocytes. NASH is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis and inflammation with hepatocyte injury (ballooning) with or without fibrosis. NASH is benign in many affected individuals but can cause progressive liver injury and, indeed, may be the major cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis1. Currently, there is no FDA approved treatment for NAFLD. Weight loss and exercise are the recommended but often difficult maintain these lifestyle changes in the long term and therefore therapeutic agents have been investigated. In this study, we propose to treat 50 patients with NAFLD and diabetes with either sitagliptin or placebo for 24 weeks. After an initial evaluation for insulin sensitivity and MRI liver fat distribution, patients will receive either 100 mg/day of sitagliptin or placebo. Patients will be monitored at regular intervals for symptoms of liver disease, side effects of sitagliptin and serum biochemical and metabolic indices. At the end of 24-weeks, patients will have a repeat medical evaluation, liver MRI and an optional liver biopsy. Pre and post treatment MRI-derived liver fat content and insulin sensitivity will be compared. The primary end point of successful therapy will be improvement in hepatic steatosis measured by MRI. Secondary end points will be improvement in insulin sensitivity and liver biochemistry.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary objectives:

1. To examine the efficacy of sitagliptin 100 mg orally daily versus placebo in improving hepatic steatosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To examine the efficacy of sitagliptin in improving serum AST in patients with NAFLD.
  2. To examine the efficacy of sitagliptin in improving serum ALT in patients with NAFLD.
  3. To examine the efficacy of sitagliptin in improving serum LDL in patients with NAFLD.
  4. To examine the efficacy of sitagliptin in the improvement of insulin sensitivity in patients with NAFLD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

44 patients with NAFLD will be randomized to either sitagliptin or placebo for 24-weeks. Enrollment of 50 patients is needed to allow for exclusion of some patients after initial evaluation and a dropout of a small number of patients because of intolerance to sitagliptin.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age at entry at least 18 years.
  2. Serum alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) aminotransferase activities that are above the upper limits of normal. 19 or more in women and 30 or more in men.
  3. Evidence of hepatic steatosis or liver fat (≥5%) by MRI.
  4. Prediabetic patients and controlled diabetic patients as defined by the ADA position statement on diabetes mellitus. Prediabetics have a HbA1c of 5.7 to 6.4 and controlled diabetic patients have an HbA1c between 6.4 and 8.0.
  5. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Uncontrolled diabetes defined as a Hb A1c ≥ 8.0.
  2. Evidence of another form of liver disease.

    • Hepatitis B as defined as presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).
    • Hepatitis C as defined by presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in serum.
    • Autoimmune hepatitis as defined by anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) of 1:160 or greater and liver histology consistent with autoimmune hepatitis or previous response to immunosuppressive therapy.
    • Autoimmune cholestatic liver disorders as defined by elevation of alkaline phosphatase and anti-mitochondrial antibody of greater than 1:80 or liver histology consistent with primary biliary cirrhosis or elevation of alkaline phosphatase and liver histology consistent with sclerosing cholangitis.
    • Wilson disease as defined by ceruloplasmin below the limits of normal and liver histology consistent with Wilson disease.
    • Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency as defined by alpha-1-antitrypsin level less than normal and liver histology consistent with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.
    • Hemochromatosis as defined by presence of 3+ or 4+ stainable iron on liver biopsy and homozygosity for C282Y or compound heterozygosity for C282Y/H63D.
    • Drug-induced liver disease as defined on the basis of typical exposure and history.
    • Bile duct obstruction as shown by imaging studies.
  3. History of excess alcohol ingestion, averaging more than 30 gm/day (3 drinks per day) in the previous 10 years, or history of alcohol intake averaging greater than 10 gm/day (1 drink per day: 7 drinks per week) in the previous one year.
  4. Advanced liver disease: platelet counts < 75,000/mm3 or prothrombin time >16 seconds or history of bleeding disorders
  5. Decompensated liver disease, Child-Pugh score greater than or equal to 7 points
  6. History of gastrointestinal bypass surgery or ingestion of drugs known to produce hepatic steatosis including corticosteroids, high-dose estrogens, methotrexate, tetracycline or amiodarone in the previous 6 months.
  7. Recent initiation or change of anti-diabetic drugs, including insulin, sulfonylureas, or thiazolidinediones in the previous 90 days.
  8. Use of sitagliptin or other agents in the same class within the 90 days prior to randomization.
  9. Significant systemic or major illnesses other than liver disease, including congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary disease with hypoxia, renal failure, organ transplantation, serious psychiatric disease, malignancy that, in the opinion of the investigator would preclude treatment with Sitagliptin and adequate follow up.
  10. History of acute pancreatitis within the last 5 years with the exception of gallstone pancreatitis.
  11. Positive test for anti-HIV.
  12. Active substance abuse, such as alcohol, inhaled or injection drugs within the previous one year.
  13. Pregnancy or inability to practice adequate contraception in women of childbearing potential.
  14. Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma: alpha-fetoprotein levels greater than 200 ng/ml and/or liver mass on imaging study that is suggestive of liver cancer.
  15. Any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigators would impede competence or compliance or possibility hinder completion of the study.
  16. Serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl.
  17. Contraindications to Sitagliptin use :

    • History of allergic reaction to Sitagliptin
    • Patients with acute liver injury or unexplained persistent elevations in ALT > 500 U/L at baseline.
    • Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant
    • Nursing mothers
  18. Contraindications to MRI:

    • The subject has any contraindication to MR imaging, such as patients with pacemakers, metallic cardiac valves, magnetic material such as surgical clips, implanted electronic infusion pumps or other conditions that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field.
    • The subject has a history of extreme claustrophobia
    • The subject cannot fit inside the MR scanner cavity

11. RECRUITMENT Enrollment of patients may be initiated once IRB approval is acquired and will continue until June 2015.

Patients will be recruited from the following populations:

  • Primary care and internal medicine clinics
  • Tertiary referral clinics at the Hillcrest Campus and Perlman Clinics:

    • GI/Liver clinic
    • Liver transplant clinic
    • Obesity clinic
    • Bariatric surgery clinic
    • Diabetes clinic
    • Lipid disorders clinic
  • Physicians taking care of the patients would provide information regarding the study and then either refer the patient to our clinic or ask the patient to directly contact the PI or research assistant.
  • Patient would be given information regarding possible studies in NAFLD in liver clinic by their providers. We would ask the patient to call or email the PI or research assistant to further discuss the study, if they are interested.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Experimental: Active drug
Sitagliptin 100 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Liver Fat Relative to Baseline Assessed by MRI-PDFF
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Participants liver fat was measured at baseline and 24 weeks. This is the percentage change in liver fat assessed by MRI-PDFF and stratified by treatment group.
Baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AST, Aspartate Aminotransferase
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
AST, measured in IU/L at baseline and 24 weeks
Baseline and 24 weeks
ALT, Alanine Aminotransferase
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
ALT, measured in IU/L at baseline and 24 weeks
Baseline and 24 weeks
LDL, Low-density Lipoprotein
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
LDL, measured in mg/dL at baseline and 24 weeks
Baseline and 24 weeks
HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
HOMA-IR, calculated as [(glucose (mg/dL) X insulin (mg/dL)) / 405 ] at baseline and 24 weeks
Baseline and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe