Treatment With Rhinospray Plus in Patients With Acute Rhinitis in the Everyday Curative Routine in Hungary

March 13, 2015 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Treatment With Rhinospray Plus of Patients With Acute Rhinitis in the Everyday Curative Routine in Hungary

Multi-centre, open-label, prospective, uncontrolled, single-arm, non-interventional study (NIS) with objective to collect and evaluate data concerning treatment with Rhinospray Plus in everyday curative routine treatment of acute rhinitis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Design:

open, observational, single-arm, uncontrolled

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 40.56.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 40.56.36002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 40.56.36003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 40.56.36004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adults and children at and above 6 years old

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients who (or in case of 6-18 years old whose legal representative) have signed the Informed Consent
  2. Male and female ambulatory outpatients being seen in a participating physicians office for routine care
  3. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of Rhinitis acuta
  4. Patient having the cognitive and functional abilities for answering the symptom specific questions
  5. Patients having expressed the willingness to participate in this observational study
  6. Patients at and above the age of 6
  7. Rhinospray Plus naive patients (patients who have not used Rhinospray Plus before)

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Uncooperative patients based on physicians judgement
  2. Patients with any conditions making the application of Rhinospray plus contraindicated
  3. Patients currently enrolled in any clinical trial which requires a change in medication for their respiratory problems
  4. Withdraw of Informed Consent
  5. Pregnancy or breast-feeding as stated in the Summary of Product Characteristic (SmPC)
  6. Patients with clinical diagnosis of allergic rhinitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
acute rhinitis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change From Baseline in the Mean of the 3 Single Symptom Scores (Blocked Nose, Sneezing and Running Nose) at the Closing/Final Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline and up to day 11
Patients scored the symptoms (blocked nose, sneezing and running nose) on a 4-point rating scale with 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The range of the mean score thus could be between 0 and 3. The change in the mean of the 3 single scores was calculated by the score at the final visit minus the score at baseline. Therefore, a negative change represents an improvement of the mean score.
Baseline and up to day 11
The Mean of the 2 Single Quality of Life Improvement Scores at the Closing/Final Visit for Daytime Activities and Quality of Sleep
Time Frame: up to day 11
The mean score of the following two "quality of life improvement" questions at the final/closing visit was calculated: "How did Rhinospray plus improve the quality of your daytime activities?" and "How did Rhinospray Plus improve the quality of your sleep?". The scores range from 1=strongly to 4=no improvement. Thus also the range of the mean score is from 1 to 4.
up to day 11

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change From Baseline in the Single Symptoms Scores ( Blocked Nose, Sneezing and Running Nose) at the Closing/Final Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and up to day 11
Patients scored the single symptoms (blocked nose, sneezing and running nose) at the end of each treatment day on a 4-point rating scale with 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The changes in the 3 single scores were calculated by the single score at the final visit minus the single score at baseline. Therefore, a negative change represents an improvement of the single scores.
Baseline and up to day 11
The Single Score of Quality of Life Improvement at the Closing/Final Visit for Daytime Activities
Time Frame: up to 11 days
The following "quality of life improvement" question at the final/closing visit were answered by the patients: "How did Rhinospray plus improve the quality of your daytime activities?"
up to 11 days
The Single Score of Quality of Life Improvement at the Closing/Final Visit for Quality of Sleep
Time Frame: Up to day 11
The following "quality of life improvement" question at the final/closing visit were answered by the patients: "How did Rhinospray plus improve the quality of your sleep?" and "How did Rhinospray Plus improve the quality of your sleep?".
Up to day 11
Subjective Assessment of the Physicians of Overall Treatment Efficacy at the Closing/Final Visit.
Time Frame: up to day 11
The efficacy of the treatment was rated by the physician at the closing/final visit for every patient.
up to day 11
Subjective Assessment of the Patient of Overall Treatment Efficacy at the Closing/Final Visit.
Time Frame: up to day 11
The efficacy of the treatment was rated by the patient at the closing/final visit.
up to day 11
Subjective Assessment of the Physicians of Overall Treatment Tolerability at the Closing/Final Visit.
Time Frame: up to day 11
The tolerability of the treatment was rated by the physician at the closing/final visit for every patient.
up to day 11
Subjective Assessment of the Patient of Overall Treatment Tolerability at the Closing/Final Visit.
Time Frame: up to day 11
The efficacy of the treatment was rated by the patient at the closing/final visit.
up to day 11

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinitis

3
Subscribe