Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Volume in Pregnant Women at Term

Solid food or fluid residue in the stomach is always a major concern when patients need medical procedures under sedation or general anesthesia, due to the high risk of pulmonary aspiration of the stomach contents. This is especially important in emergency procedures, when a fasting period is not observed. The aspiration of the stomach contents into one's lungs can lead to serious complications (such as severe respiratory failure). Information from a bedside ultrasound assessment of the stomach may be a very useful tool to decide whether or not it's safe to proceed, cancel or delay a surgical procedure.

The investigotrs hypothesize that a mathematical model can be constructed to predict clear fluid volume in the stomach of non-labouring pregnant patients, as it has been developed in healthy adult volunteers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Food residue in the stomach of patients scheduled to have surgery is considered a major risk factor for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents. The resulting respiratory compromise after aspiration is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The risk of pulmonary aspiration is especially important in pregnant women, as they may often require surgery without having observed appropriate fasting. A bedside ultrasound assessment of the status of the gastric content would be of great value for the clinician. This technique has recently been shown very promising in non-pregnant patients and it is important to study its feasibility in the pregnant population.

In this study, patients fast overnight and are randomized to the following groups: empty, or various volumes of fluid (50, 100, 200, 300 or 400mL of apple juice before scanning). Their gastric contents are then assessed by an anesthesiologist, using ultrasound. The investigators aim to evaluate a standardized quantitative ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in non-labouring pregnant women.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteer non-labouring pregnant women at term (≥ 36 weeks)-
  • 18 years or older
  • ASA Physical Status I-III
  • 50-120 kg of weight
  • 150 cm of height or taller
  • Ability to understand the rationale of the study assessments and to provide signed informed consent
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known pre-existing abnormal anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract
  • History of upper GI tract surgical procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: empty stomach
No fluid will be given to the patient prior to scanning.
Experimental: 50mL
50mL of water will be given to the patient prior to scanning
water
Experimental: 100mL
100mL of water will be given to the patient prior to scanning
water
Experimental: 200mL
200mL of water will be given to the patient prior to scanning
water
Experimental: 300mL
300mL of water will be given to the patient prior to scanning
water
Experimental: 400mL
400mL of water will be given to the patient prior to scanning
water

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between ingested volume and CSA in antrum
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes
The patient will ingest 0, 50, 100, 200, 300 or 400mL of apple juice, and then the cross-sectional area (CSA) will be measured.
5-10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cristian Arzola, MD, Mount Sinai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Aspiration

Clinical Trials on water

3
Subscribe