RICALOR Italian Registry for Complications During Regional Anesthesia (RICALOR)

January 16, 2014 updated by: Massimo Allegri, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo

RICALOR - Registro Italiano Complicanze Anestesia LOco Regionale - Italian Registry for Complications During Regional Anesthesia

Regional anesthesia is the cornerstone of modern postoperative analgesia, but concerns remain about possible adverse effects and complication.

RICALOR Group Investigators developed a national registry to register the incidence of regional anesthesia-associated complications and to identify possible risk factors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The project has been advertised through direct contact with relevant organizations in anaesthesia and pain management. Any other center willing to participate is provided with all the documents to receive its local Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, and a 'local responsible' (LR) is nominated to co-ordinate the project and to be responsible of data collection locally.

Centers receiving IRB approval collect data about different types of procedure (adult major and minor surgery, pediatric surgery, obstetric anesthesia, pain management). Data are collected on a specifically designed form, and every center quarterly sent the promoter centre a report including general data and a specific report for every occurred complication.

Eligibility criteria

Investigators collect the total number of intervention and the number of regional anesthesia(RA) techniques performed . Patients recorded as "case" and "controls" had to sign a specifical informed consent. For pediatric patients and patients not able to sign for any reason, a specific form is included in the document, to be signed by parents or any legally-established tutor, as required for every clinical procedure or scientific trial in our country.

General data

Total number of interventions, the number of central neuraxial block (CNBs), peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and continuous PNBs (CPNBs) performed. CNBs are classified as epidurals, combined spinal-epidurals (CSEs), subarachnoid. PNBs and cPNBs are divided into ultrasound-guided, nerve stimulation-guided and blind techniques.

Specific data - report for complications

For each complication a specific report is sent for data analysis, including data concerning cases (patient with complication) and controls (the two following patients undergoing the same type of loco-regional technique).

Reports are slightly different for CNBs and (c)PNBs. For every patient, the investigators register demographic data (age, ASA-American Society of Anesthesiologists- status, height and weight), data regarding surgical technique (type of surgery, open/video-laparoscopic/robotic approach, election/emergency surgery) and data regarding anti-thromboembolic therapy (drugs, timing of suspension before/after blockade).

A second part of the report is strictly dedicated to the technique and to the type of complication occurred (and, hence, different in central and peripheral blocks).

Statistical analysis

Study population is estimated basing on previous studies of major complications after CNBs, which indicate an incidence of major adverse effects of 4.2 on 100.000 patients. Estimating an incidence of 1:25.000, a number of 25.000 procedures was calculated to be needed for the study, with a confidence interval of 95%. The primary endpoint was to assess cumulative incidence of adverse effects, while a following case-control analysis will be performed to identify possible risk factors.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

63692

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients undergoing surgery with regional anesthesia during study period will be considered for complications' incidence calculation .

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • M/F
  • undergoing surgery or procedures needing regional anesthesia
  • signed informed consent for data treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
regional anesthesia
patients undergoing regional anesthesia procedures
Spinal, epidural, combined spinal epidural, nerve blocks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of subjects presenting complications associated with regional anesthesia techniques
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of subjects presenting complications associated with regional anesthesia is recorded, and when a neurologic deficit could occur, we monitor the patient for at least 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
statistically significant difference in cases (complication) and controls regarding factors potentially affecting complications' occurrence
Time Frame: up to dismission
Case control analysis to identify risk factors connected with major complications. Analyzed variables will be: demographic variables, emergency/election surgery, equipment (needles, type of guidance), tourniquet, patients position, drugs dosing regimen, anti-thrombotic therapy, type of surgery, operator experience, type of block.
up to dismission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Bugada Dario; Allegri Massimo; RICALOR Group investigators; Zadra Nicola; Braschi Antonio ; Borghi Battista; Grossi Paolo.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on regional anesthesia

3
Subscribe