Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia

January 21, 2022 updated by: Jurgen Birnbaum, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia - Prospective Randomized Study of Needle-nerve Distance in Different Cannulas for Regional Nerve Blockade

Regional anaesthesia is a frequently used procedure. Currently, blockades are increasingly carried out without nerve stimulation. The risk of nerve lesion is about 3 %. Industrial efforts frequently referred to ultrasound optimisation of the regional anaesthesia cannula. In order to optimise patient safety, the benefit of both procedures (stimulation and ultrasound) should be combined and both procedures optimised. In this study, the influence of the needle electrode size on the stimulability of the nerve ischiadicus should be determined.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are various methods of performing regional anesthesia. In recent years, the focus has been on ultrasound-supported regional anaesthesia, and the stimulation methods that were often used in the past were no longer used or used less frequently. The combination of both methods may be an additional safety aspect and can contribute to an improved blocking quality. In addition to the best possible ultrasound quality, an optimal stimulation quality is also required. The investigators plan to carry out dual-guidance blockages of the ischiadic nerve with various regional anaesthesia needles (manufacturer of the used needles: Pajunk Medical Produkte GmbH, Geisingen, Germany; Teleflex Medical GmbH, Kernen, Germany). All regional anaesthesia cannulae are approved for the planned blockades of humans in Germany.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Deutschland
      • Berlin, Deutschland, Germany, 10115
        • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Charité Mitte

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of the written declaration of consent
  • Age of at least 18 years
  • No participation in another intervention study during participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • present contraindication for the application of regional anesthesia and nerve stimulation
  • Cardiac pacemaker/AICD (Automated internal cardioverter defibrillator) carrier
  • Known allergies to used medicines
  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Ineligible patients
  • Missing consent
  • Pregnancy/nursing patients
  • Classification of patients into class 4 or higher status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists
  • Existing nerve damage in the target area
  • Medically treated diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse or alcohol abuse in the patient's history (using AUDIT)
  • Visibility score of the nerve of 3 or more
  • Participation in another intervention study during participation
  • Accommodation in an institution on the basis of a court or administrative order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tuohy

After a careful disinfection of the puncture site, under sterile conditions and under ultrasonographic control with the application of nerve stimulation (settings: stimulation current primary 2.0 mA with stepwise reduction over 1.0 mA to 0.5 mA, pulse width 0.1 ms, pulse frequency 2 Hz) of the N. ischiadicus blocked by 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75 %. (electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound) If no motor response can be triggered by stimulation, the closest possible needle-nerve distance is generated at a pulse strength of 1mA and regional anesthesia is performed. (protective nerve stimulation) Subsequently, the transplantation into the supine position and the further procedure specific to the operation (use of other regional procedures in combination or general anaesthesia).

A tuohy needle is used.

The patients receive the planned anaesthesia procedure according to the procedure to be performed. Only nerve blockages are carried out, which are considered to be analgesic useful for the planned operations on the basis of typical nerve courses. A touhy cannula is used.
Active Comparator: Facet

After a careful disinfection of the puncture site, under sterile conditions and under ultrasonographic control with the application of nerve stimulation (settings: stimulation current primary 2.0 mA with stepwise reduction over 1.0 mA to 0.5 mA, pulse width 0.1 ms, pulse frequency 2 Hz) of the N. ischiadicus blocked by 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75 %. (electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound) If no motor response can be triggered by stimulation, the closest possible needle-nerve distance is generated at a pulse strength of 1mA and regional anesthesia is performed. (protective nerve stimulation) Subsequently, the transplantation into the supine position and the further procedure specific to the operation (use of other regional procedures in combination or general anaesthesia).

A facet needle is used.

The patients receive the planned anaesthesia procedure according to the procedure to be performed. Only nerve blockages are carried out, which are considered to be analgesic useful for the planned operations on the basis of typical nerve courses. A facet cannula is used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasound distance
Time Frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Ultrasound-based measurement of needle-nerve distance during the application of the regional anesthesia of the N. ischiadicus during infragluteal access.
duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visibility_1
Time Frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Ultrasound visibility of needle
duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Visibility_2
Time Frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Ultrasound visibility of nerve
duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Impedance
Time Frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Impedance measured by nerve stimulator while progressing the needle
duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Effect_motor
Time Frame: duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Effectiveness of the motor blockade measured by possible movement of the foot
duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Effect_sensoric
Time Frame: duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Effectiveness of the blockade measured by temperature sensibility testing on the food
duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impedance_Change
Time Frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Changes in impedance measurement while blockade
duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Complications
Time Frame: duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Occurence of complications of regional anesthesia
duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Contact
Time Frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Number of Needle-Nerve-Contacts by Ultrasound-measurement
duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jürgen Birnbaum, MD, PhD, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DUAL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trials on Regional Anesthesia Touhy

3
Subscribe