Evaluation of Reader Training Processes

August 27, 2015 updated by: Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

Evaluation of Reader Training Processes by Comparing Clinical Interpretations to Centralized Expert Reads

This study is designed to evaluate the agreement between florbetapir F 18 scan interpretation in the clinic and by expert readers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Scan obtained for clinical reasons

Exclusion Criteria:

- None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Clinical Practice Scans
Approximately 250 florbetapir F 18 scans and final scan reports interpreted in a clinical setting will be collected from physicians across the country. These results will then be compared to expert panel interpretations for the same scans.
No study drug will be administered in this study - scans previously acquired in the course of clinical practice.
Other Names:
  • Amyvid
  • 18F-AV-45
  • florbetapir

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement Between Expert Panel and Clinical Practice Reads
Time Frame: Scan acquired 50-60 minutes post injection
Agreement between expert panel consensus scan interpretations and clinical practice reader scan interpretations was calculated as a weighted Kappa value across all cases and all clinical practice readers.
Scan acquired 50-60 minutes post injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on florbetapir F 18

3
Subscribe