Electronic Method for Recording Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

February 10, 2014 updated by: Vaclav Prochazka, MD, PhD. MSc, University Hospital Ostrava

Validation of Electronic Recording of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in Men

Urinary diaries have proven to be beneficial in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), however they have not achieved widespread acceptance. The likely reason is the fact that the pen and paper diaries are labor intensive for both patient (need to carry a pen and paper and record each event) and doctor (need to transfer, summarize and analyze the data).

Hypothesis: Electronic voiding diary, would automate the recording and analysis of data, expedite the process, improve its accuracy and cost effectiveness.

Electronic recording of lower urinary tract symptoms (SUF) uses wireless phone and web based technologies to record LUTS remotely and store the data on a secure website which can be accessed by the doctor or patient whenever needed. The goal of this study was to compare its validity and reliability to the traditional micturition chart (MC) recording method - the current gold standard where the patient records the time of micturition and degree of urgency using a pen and paper.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

SUF records the sound of the urine stream striking the water in a toilet bowl. This generates a sound file, which resembles the standard uroflowmetry recording. The degree of urgency is recorded by pressing the number 1-5 on the key pad which corresponds to the 5-point urgency scale. Urgency is recorded immediately following micturition or whenever experiencing urgency without bladder emptying. A dedicated server runs a program, which automatically processes incoming data. All data recorded from an individual is stored prospectively, in separate files, on a secure website. Each record is associated with a time stamp, providing information on urinary frequency.

A pen and pencil MC will be used to record baseline parameters (voiding urgency and frequency). Quality of life (QoL) will be evaluated using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Questionnaire, and two standardized questions: Quality of Life due to Urinary Symptoms (QoL US) and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC).

Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study which consists of two three day periods when every micturition event and lower urinary tract symptom not associated with micturition was recorded. An expected average time will be 6 days.

Twenty nine men, average age 67.8 years (range 49 - 80), which presented to the urology clinic with LUTS, were included in the study. After signing the informed consent, patients will be asked to record every micturition and degree of urgency using SUF for a period of 3 days. They will then be asked to record their frequency of micturition and the degree of every episode of urgency using a pen and paper MC for an equal length of time. The efficacy of recording LUTS with each method will be analyzed and compared. The content validity of SUF (assessment of whether the instrument makes sense to patients), will be assessed at the conclusion of the study when all patients will be interviewed one-on-one by a specialized research nurse. Patients will be asked to state their preference for one of the two diaries, and disclose the number of events they forgot to or could not record. The construct validity (relationship between the recorded data and underlying theories) will be evaluated by the correlation of symptoms recorded with SUF or MC based on QoL measures. The results of this study will be compared to previously published evidence, suggesting that more severe LUTS are associated with a lower score on the health related QoL questionnaires.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nothern Moravia
      • Ostrava, Nothern Moravia, Czech Republic, 708 52
        • Department of Urology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men presenting to the urology clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men seeking treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Study group
Men presenting to the urology clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the level of accuracy and adherence to the study protocol
Time Frame: January - February 2014 (1 month)

Asses a difference between average number of micturition events, frequency, and degree of urgency episodes recorded using SUF and MC, to determine is SUF provides equally relevant information to that obtained by the standard approach.

User compliance will be assessed though recording the number of patients who forgot to record micturitions and urgency episodes using SUF versus MC.

January - February 2014 (1 month)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
User preference
Time Frame: January - February (1 month)
The content validity of SUF (assessment of whether the instrument makes sense to patients), will be assessed at the conclusion of the study when all patients will be interviewed one-on-one by a specialized research nurse. Patients will be asked to state their preference for one of the two diaries.
January - February (1 month)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Krhut, MD, PhD, Ostrava University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SUF LUTS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

3
Subscribe