Preoperative Dexmedetomidine & EC50 of Propofol (PreopDXM)

March 24, 2014 updated by: Hee-Pyoung Park, Seoul National University Hospital

Preoperative Dexmedetomidine Reduces the EC50 of Propofol for Successful i-gelTM Insertion Without Muscle Relaxants

Dexmedetomidine is a useful anaesthetic adjuvant for general anaesthesia. In this prospective randomised study, we determined whether preoperative dexmedetomidine administration could reduce the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of propofol for successful i-gelTM insertion without muscle relaxants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Propofol is a useful induction agent for LMA insertion without muscle relaxants because it profoundly inhibits pharyngeal and laryngeal reactivity. A previous report showed that the effect-site concentration of propofol for successful classic LMA insertion in 50% of adults (EC50) without muscle relaxants in healthy male patients was 8.72 (0.55) µg ml-1. The EC50 of propofol may be dependent on the type of LMA used. A previous study comparing the EC50 of the propofol concentration between classic and proseal LMA insertions demonstrated that the EC50 of propofol needed for proseal LMA insertion was 35% greater than that needed for classic LMA insertion. Unfortunately, no investigation has been performed to determine the EC50 of the propofol concentration required for i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective alpha-2 agonist, has sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic properties. Such beneficial characteristics make DEX a useful anaesthetic adjuvant for general anaesthesia. Many reports have revealed the beneficial effects of DEX in terms of reducing intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, postoperative analgesic demand, and increased haemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli such as endotracheal intubation. A previous investigation showed that preoperative clonidine, an alpha-2 agonist, decreased the EC50 required for LMA insertion.

We hypothesised that preoperative DEX administration can reduce the propofol concentration required for i-gel insertion. In this study, we compared the EC50 of propofol needed for successful i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants between DEX and placebo groups

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-799
        • Seoul National University of Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status I-II patients who were 20-65 years old and scheduled for general anaesthesia for urologic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an allergy to alpha-2 adrenergic agonists or propofol
  • Patients who anticipated difficult airway (cervical spinal disease, Mallampati score of III or IV, a mouth opening of <2.5 cm, and/or body mass index of >30 kg m-2), unstable teeth
  • Patients with bradycardia of <50 beats/min, heart block greater than first degree, severe cardiorespiratory dysfunction
  • Patients with symptoms of upper respiratory infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group D : Dexmedetomidine + propofol group
In Group D, DEX (1 µg kg-1) was intravenously loaded for 10 min before induction of anaesthesia.

All patients were pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen with spontaneous breathing for 3 min before the end of loading of dexmedetomidine. Anaesthesia was induced with predetermined effect-site propofol concentrations using a target-controlled infusion device (Orchestra; Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France). The first patient in Group D received an effect-site propofol concentration of 3 and 5 µg mL-1, respectively, over 5 min.

After equilibration of the plasma and effect-site propofol concentrations, i-gel (size 4 for patients weighing 50-90 kg, size 3 for patients weighing 30-50 kg) was inserted using the standard technique by a single anaesthesiologist staff member with expertise in i-gel insertion and who entered the operating room immediately before i-gel insertion to blind him to the group assignment.

Placebo Comparator: Group C : Saline + propofol group
In Group C, 0.9% of normal saline (1 µg kg-1) was loaded 10 min before induction of anaeshtesia.

All patients were pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen with spontaneous breathing for 3 min before the end of loading of normal saline. Anaesthesia was induced with predetermined effect-site propofol concentrations using a target-controlled infusion device (Orchestra; Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France). The first patient in Group C received an effect-site propofol concentration of 3 and 5 µg mL-1, respectively, over 5 min.

After equilibration of the plasma and effect-site propofol concentrations, i-gel (size 4 for patients weighing 50-90 kg, size 3 for patients weighing 30-50 kg) was inserted using the standard technique by a single anaesthesiologist staff member with expertise in i-gel insertion and who entered the operating room immediately before i-gel insertion to blind him to the group assignment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EC50 of propofol required for successful i-gel insertion
Time Frame: During i-gel insertion anticipated up to 1 min
The EC50 of propofol for successful i-gel insertion was determined by a modification of Dixon's up-and-down method. The response of each patient determined the effect-site propofol concentration for the next patient. If the response was deemed 'successful', the next target concentration of propofol was decreased by 0.5 µg mL-1. If the response was deemed a 'failure', the target concentration was increased by the same dose. The process was repeated until the sixth crossover point (success/failure) was obtained.
During i-gel insertion anticipated up to 1 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the total dose of propofol infused before i-gel insertion
Time Frame: During i-gel insertion time anticipated upto 1min
The total amount of propofol infused before i-gel insertion was noted. The insertion time, defined as the time from picking up the i-gel until the initiation of mechanical ventilation.
During i-gel insertion time anticipated upto 1min
the presence/severity of airway trauma after i-gel insertion
Time Frame: At the time point of removing the i-gel from patient's mouth
After removing the i-gel, airway trauma (defined as any blood staining on the device) was recorded.
At the time point of removing the i-gel from patient's mouth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD, Professor
  • Principal Investigator: Young Cheol Kim, Md PhD, Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urologic Surgery

Clinical Trials on Group D : Dexmedetomidine + propofol group

3
Subscribe