A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Patient and Provider Education on Use of Home Dialysis

October 9, 2018 updated by: Braden Manns, University of Calgary

Patient and Provider Education for Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease: Assessing the Impact on Barriers and Use of Home Dialysis

Patients with severe kidney failure require dialysis or transplantation to survive. For those in whom a transplant is not an option, there are two main dialysis options: hemodialysis (either incenter or at home) or home peritoneal dialysis. Home-based therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are under-utilized in many Canadian jurisdictions with the proportion of home-based therapies varying between 10 and 40% across centres. Studies show that the low use of home dialysis is due to a variety of factors, though patient and provider awareness and knowledge of home dialysis are major factors. In this cluster randomized trial, the investigators will determine whether a standardized modality education program directed at patients, in combination with a provider-directed intervention, can increase the use of home dialysis in incident dialysis patients in Canada.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Patients with severe kidney failure require dialysis or transplantation to survive. For those in whom a transplant is not an option, there are two main dialysis options: hemodialysis (either incenter or at home) or home peritoneal dialysis. Home-based therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are under-utilized in many Canadian jurisdictions with the proportion of home-based therapies varying between 10 and 40% across centres. The use of home dialysis remains lower than expected due to combination of patient, caregiver, provider, and health system barriers. Previous studies have highlighted several potential patient and caregiver barriers to use of home therapies including knowledge, skills, personal circumstances, and social supports. Provider barriers have been reported to include lack of training in peritoneal dialysis, lack (or perceived lack) in skills and knowledge, bias, and possibly inadequate physician reimbursement for home dialysis.

The Canadian Kidney Knowledge Translation and Generation Network (CANN-NET), a national network of clinicians, researchers and knowledge users that was established to ensure best practices for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), recently created dialysis modality educational tools aimed at patients and kidney health care providers. On behalf of CANN-NET, the investigators propose a cluster randomized controlled trial (with clusters consisting of severe CKD clinics) of a knowledge translation (KT) strategy to increase use of home dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Informed by careful survey work, clinics randomized to the knowledge translation intervention will receive patient and provider directed educational tools, including the MATCH D tool, compelling visual aids (infographic, white board animated video, and an educational video on dialysis modality options), audit and feedback, and in-person medical detailing. Control clinics will continue with their usual practice with respect to dialysis modality education.

Primary Objective To determine whether a standardized modality education program directed at patients, in combination with provider-directed interventions can increase the use of home dialysis in incident dialysis patients in Canada

Study Design: A cluster randomized trial of CKD clinics across Canada comparing the efficacy and safety of a KT intervention aiming to increase use of home dialysis in patients with advanced CKD. The unit of observation will be the patient (i.e., outcomes will be measured at the level of an individual patient), and the unit of randomization will be at the level of the multidisciplinary CKD clinic.

Team: The investigative study team includes experts in the clinical epidemiology of CKD and kidney failure, local opinion leaders from every province/region, as well experts in knowledge translation and cluster randomized design. As such, the investigators are well positioned to carry out the proposed study.

Research Significance: Home dialysis, in comparison to incenter hemodialysis, is associated with increased patient independence, better clinical outcomes, and lower health care costs. Due to a variety of factors, home dialysis use remains variable across Canada. This study will test the effectiveness of a KT strategy to increase the use of home dialysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
        • University of Calgary
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
        • University of Manitoba

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Multidisciplinary clinics in Canada that provide care coordinated by a Nephrologist to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). These clinics have already been identified in a previous survey

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active KT Intervention
CKD clinics receiving the active knowledge translation intervention.
  1. Provider & patient-directed infographics educating patients about home dialysis will be displayed in prominent clinic wall space
  2. Educational white board presentations promoting home dialysis
  3. Each clinic will receive reports outlining their current use of home dialysis in incident ESRD patients compared with provincial & national averages
  4. A Canadian version of the MATCH D tool will be provided to clinic staff, to help evaluate patient appropriateness for home dialysis.
  5. Each clinic will receive an in-person visit from one of the study investigators/collaborators detailing the benefits of home dialysis, and the educational tools being offered to support care within their clinic.
No Intervention: Usual standard of care
Clinics will continue their standard of care education and approach to use of home dialysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Efficacy Outcome: Use of home dialysis
Time Frame: Use of home dialysis at six months after dialysis initiation
Proportion of patients with incident end-stage renal disease initiating dialysis after the intervention who are using home dialysis (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) six months after dialysis initiation. Use of home dialysis will be ascertained from the clinic clusters and confirmed by linkage with the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR).
Use of home dialysis at six months after dialysis initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary outcome: Use of home dialysis at six months in patients who have been followed by a Nephrologist
Time Frame: Use of home dialysis at six months after dialysis initiation in patients who have been followed by a Nephrologist
Proportion of patients with incident end-stage renal disease initiating dialysis after the intervention who were followed by a Nephrologist prior to dialysis initiation who are using home dialysis (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) six months after dialysis initiation. Use of home dialysis will be ascertained from the clinic clusters and confirmed by linkage with the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR).
Use of home dialysis at six months after dialysis initiation in patients who have been followed by a Nephrologist

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Braden Manns, MD, University of Calgary
  • Study Director: Navdeep Tangri, MD PhD FRCPC, University of Manitoba

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Active KT intervention

3
Subscribe