The Comparative Study of OCT,Gemstone CT and 320-detector Row Spiral CT for Evaluating Restenosis of Coronary Artery Stent

August 18, 2014 updated by: Xuzhou Central Hospital

In-stent restenosis is a major reason of coronary heart disease recurrence .Even in drug eluting stent(DES), Restenosis rate could be up to 10% in diabetes and complex lesions though it was about 3-5% in general. It is particularly important that in-stent restenosis after implantation was early diagnosed and detected. The evaluation of OCT imaging is more accurate for narrow area calculation, more clear for narrow organization structure and more specific for detecting tissue types.It is currently the best way for restenosis histologic diagnosis.But it has many weakness such as the higher cost,an invasive test, expensive instrument, relatively complicated to operate,and etc.In this study, OCT image was regard as the "gold standard" of stent restenosis.

The improvement of spatial resolution of Gemstone CT can effectively improve the imaging quality and the measurement's accuracy of coronary artery stents.The diagnostic value of in-stent restenosis of Gemstone CT is higher than of the 320-detector row spiral CT. To a certain extent, the gemstone CT can replace OCT for examining the in-stent restenosis.

This study will examine the degree of in-stent restenosis by the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT and compare the two ways on the basis of the result of OCT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China, 221000
        • Recruiting
        • Xuzhou Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 20-80, All genders
  2. Unlimited time of implantation of coronary artery stents
  3. Myocardial ischemia symptoms such as Chest tightness and/or chest pain in patients after stent implantation
  4. No clinical symptoms, but myocardial ischemia suggested by other noninvasive tests
  5. Routine re-testing 9-12 months after stent implantation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 120 umol/L)
  2. Allergy of contrast
  3. Severe heart failure
  4. Uncontrollable heart rate or contraindication of taking metoprolol
  5. Unstable condition
  6. the ventricular rate beyond 70 beats / min and irregular rhythm after adjusting.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gemstone CT
Gemstone CT :Discovery CT750 HD(high definition) ,GE(General Electric Co.) Healthcare, Milwaukee; CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis which Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient
Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient who was suspected in-stent restenosis.About after 10 days,they would accept the check of OCT which wold be the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.
Other Names:
  • OCT
  • Gemstone CT
  • 320-detector row spiral CT
Active Comparator: 320-detector row spiral CT
320-detector row spiral CT:Aquilion One, Toshiba, Nasu, Japan. CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis which Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient .
Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient who was suspected in-stent restenosis.About after 10 days,they would accept the check of OCT which wold be the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.
Other Names:
  • OCT
  • Gemstone CT
  • 320-detector row spiral CT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of detection of in-stent restenosis with the gemstone CT as compared to the 320-detector row spiral CT will be investigated
Time Frame: On the day in which a patient receives the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT, estimated to take 10 mins
Masked examiners (CT specialists) will evaluate and compare the degree of in-stent restenosis of the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT images for the presence and features of in-stent restenosis. In this study, OCT image was regard as the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.
On the day in which a patient receives the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT, estimated to take 10 mins

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation burden of the the gemstone CT or the 320-detector row spiral CT and OCT
Time Frame: one month
In a relatively short time,the patient will accept the two checks of CT and OCT(Interval period about 10 days).So,it is necessary to clear the reacts of these patients
one month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measurement of the physical characteristics of in-stent restenosis structures seen on OCT
Time Frame: On the day in which a patient receives the check of OCT
On the day in which a patient receives the check of OCT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis

3
Subscribe