ETREAT Study on Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections to Treat Post-stroke Upper and/or Lower Limb Spasticity (ETREAT)

August 14, 2019 updated by: Ipsen

ETREAT: A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) Injections in Patients With Post-stroke Upper and/or Lower Limb Spasticity in the Early Stage of Spasticity Development.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of BoNT-A on functional improvement in patients with post-stroke upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage of spasticity development, according to routine clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Bilbao, Spain
      • Cadiz, Spain
      • Cordoba, Spain
      • Granada, Spain
      • Huelva, Spain
      • Las Palmas De G.C., Spain
      • Lleida, Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
      • Murcia, Spain
      • Palma de mallorca, Spain
      • Pontevedra, Spain
      • Salamanca, Spain
      • San Sebastián, Spain
      • Santiago, Spain
      • Sevilla, Spain
      • Valladolid, Spain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Post-stroke spasticity

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women ≥ 18-80 years.
  • Poststroke limb spasticity.
  • Patients who have suffered a stroke in the previous 6 months.
  • Treatment goal has been previously agreed with the patient or their legal representative.
  • Patients with clinically significant poststroke upper/lower limb spasticity, in whom it has been decided to perform multidisciplinary treatment with BoNT-A + rehabilitation.
  • No previous treatment with BoNT-A.
  • Patient is able to follow the protocol.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuromuscular disease.
  • Use of drugs that interfere with neuromuscular transmission.
  • Any other condition that could interfere with rehabilitation or evaluation of the results.
  • Diagnosis of spasticity not associated with stroke.
  • Pregnant or nursing mothers.
  • Prior participation in any other study in the 6 months before study entry

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score.
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline, 16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spasticity patterns will be defined in patients with upper and/or lower limb spasticity in the early stage after stroke
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Descriptive statistics will be presented in addition to 95% confidence intervals for the mean and percentages
Baseline, 16 months
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score.
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline, 16 months
Baseline characteristics of patients
Time Frame: Baseline
Demographic characteristics
Baseline
Percentage of patients reporting functional improvement evaluated by Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) score.
Time Frame: From baseline up to 16 months
From baseline up to 16 months
Change in pain according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline, 16 months
Passive function of upper and/or lower limbs according to primary treatment target (PTT) from the disability assessment scale (DAS).
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline, 16 months
Comfortable barefoot walking speed, measured with the 10-meter walking speed test.
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline, 16 months
Change on EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 16 months
Baseline, 16 months
Estimation of use of healthcare resources and costs associated with management of spasticity.
Time Frame: From baseline up to 16 months
From baseline up to 16 months
Time interval between injections
Time Frame: From baseline up to 16 months
From baseline up to 16 months
Cost per patient
Time Frame: From baseline up to 16 months
From baseline up to 16 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spasticity

Subscribe