- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02284685
A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment Among College Students
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Eating disorders (EDs) have the highest rate of mortality of any mental illness. ED age of onset coincides with the undergraduate years (ages 18-25). As such, colleges provide access to a large, epidemiologically vulnerable population and present a unique opportunity for intervention. On college campuses, 14% of female and 4% of male students screen positive for clinically significant EDs. An estimated 80% of these students do not receive treatment. Left untreated EDs typically become more severe and refractory to treatment. Help-seeking interventions typically focus on minimizing stigma, improving knowledge, and addressing other barriers emphasized by classic theories of health behavior. On the whole, these interventions have failed to increase treatment utilization for the vast majority of students with ED symptoms. Innovative approaches are urgently needed to narrow the ED treatment gap on college campuses.
The proposed study builds on the most comprehensive research to date on mental health service utilization in college populations, which the Principal Investigator of this study (PI) has developed with her faculty advisor. Findings reveal new insight into the ED treatment gap: students with untreated EDs report not seeking help for reasons such as lack of time, lack of perceived need, ambivalence about the severity of need, belief that the problem will resolve itself without treatment, and a desire to deal with issues "on my own." These reasons imply a lack of urgency but not necessarily a strong resistance to receiving treatment. In similar health contexts (e.g., for diet/exercise, use of preventative care), behavioral economic interventions have produced positive results by addressing several cognitive biases, including the default bias (individuals 'go with the flow' of preset options) and the sign effect (losses (negative outcomes) are substantially more psychologically costly than gains (positive outcomes)). The present intervention study addresses these biases in an effort to increase service use among undergraduate students with untreated ED symptoms (as identified in an online screen).
In a 12-week study, the study team is using a factorial design to test the effects of three intervention components: peer norming, default option, and sign effect. The intervention components are delivered via email messaging. To address the default bias, email messages reframe treatment use as an opt-out (as opposed to opt-in) behavior, thus nudging students to seek help. Students are able to check a box to opt out of receiving treatment linkage. Those who do not opt-out receive, without any purposeful action, continued assistance connecting to treatment. For the sign effect, messages emphasize the negative consequences of untreated EDs to engender urgency. Students in conditions with peer norming see how their levels of eating disorder symptoms (results from widely-used, validated measures included in the baseline survey) compare with average symptom levels among other undergraduates (with data taken from national surveys previously conducted by the study team). Follow-up data is being collected at weeks 6 and 12. Intervention components are operationalized in electronic messages delivered over 12-weeks (anticipated: January-May 2015).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48104
- University of Michigan
-
-
New York
-
Annandale-on-Hudson, New York, United States, 12504
- Bard College
-
-
North Carolina
-
Boone, North Carolina, United States, 28608
- Appalachian State University
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16546
- Mercyhurst University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergraduate at participating university
- Untreated symptoms of an eating disorder (as identified in an online screen)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years of age
- Studying abroad during study period
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: A (opt-out, loss, social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, loss, social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: B (opt-out, gain, social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, gain, social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: C (opt-out, loss, no social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, loss, no social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: D (opt-out, gain, no social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-out of receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-out, gain, no social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: E (opt-in, loss, social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, loss, social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: F (opt-in, gain, social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, gain, social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: G (opt-in, loss, no social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the negative consequences (losses) of not seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, loss, no social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
Experimental: H (opt-in, gain, no social norming)
Students in this intervention arm must opt-in to receiving linkage to eating disorder resources on their campus; messages do not include social norming (statistics comparing their rates of eating disorder symptoms to national averages on widely-used and clinically validated screening tools); and messages frame the benefits of seeking-help for current disordered eating symptoms.
The intervention ('A Novel Intervention Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students') is this version of the email messages (opt-in, gain, no social norming).
|
Online intervention designed to identify and increase help-seeking among undergraduates with previously undiagnosed/untreated eating disorders
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Help-seeking behavior (Use of services (e.g., counseling/therapy) for eating and body image issues)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Use of services (e.g., counseling/therapy) for eating and body image issues
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Predictors of help-seeking behavior (e.g., perceived need/urgency, knowledge, attitudes, intentions to seek help)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Predictors of help-seeking behavior (e.g., perceived need/urgency, knowledge, attitudes, intentions to seek help)
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sarah K Lipson, MEd, University of Michigan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- F037058
- 1F31MH105149-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Eating Disorders
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityMuğla Sıtkı Koçman University; The Scientific and Technological Research Council... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingEating Disorders | Eating Behavior | Orthodontic Appliance Complication | Eating HabitTurkey
-
Shalvata Mental Health CenterUniversity of Haifa; The Touro College and University SystemUnknownBinge-Eating Disorder | Bulimia Nervosa | Night-eating Syndrome
-
Lindner Center of HOPEUniversity of CincinnatiCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingEating DisorderUnited States
-
Cornell CollegeNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedEating DisorderCanada
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedEating Disorder
-
Laval UniversityCanadian Foundation for Dietetic Research (CFDR)Completed
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe Hilda & Preston Davis Foundation; Global Foundation for Eating DisordersCompletedEating Disorder | Binge-eating DisorderUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingEating DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Promoting Eating Disorder Treatment among College Students
-
University of ConnecticutCompletedPhysical Activity | Health BehaviorUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Mae Lynn Reyes-Rodriguez, PhDNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of North Carolina, Chapel... and other collaboratorsCompletedBulimia Nervosa | Binge Eating Disorder | Eating Disorder Not Otherwise SpecifiedUnited States