Target Engagement of a Novel Dissonance-Based Treatment for DSM-5 Eating Disorders

June 5, 2025 updated by: Eric Stice, Stanford University

Most people with an eating disorder (ED) do not receive good treatment. The investigators have developed a new brief group treatment that is supposed to work by reducing how much women with an ED value the impossible thinness standard promoted by the media and how much they value/crave binge foods. The investigators want to test whether the treatment actually changes those two mechanisms using brain scan data, which is more objective than completing questionnaires and even interviews.

In the first phase of the study (R61), the investigators will compare women in the treatment versus those on a wait-list. If the investigators can show that the treatment "works" (does what the investigators think it does) compared to no active treatment (women will be allowed to seek and receive outside help but investigators will not provide it until after the wait-list), investigators will conduct the second phase of study (R33),where they will randomly assign women with an ED to either the new treatment or to a group treatment that represents what many college mental health clinics provide to their clients with ED.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Only 3-20% of individuals with eating disorders (EDs) receive treatment, and those who do rarely receive evidence-based treatments because they are very intensive and costly, few clinicians deliver them, and they differ for the various EDs. These factors have hindered broad implementation of evidence-based treatments, implying that a brief frontline outpatient treatment for a range of EDs that could be easily, cheaply, and widely implemented would address a major public health problem. There is also limited experimental evidence regarding factors that maintain EDs and mechanisms of action for ED treatments. The investigators propose to conduct a project that translates basic persuasion research into clinical hypotheses and a novel treatment.

The investigators hypothesize that EDs are maintained by (1) excessive valuation of the thin beauty ideal, which prompts caloric restriction and other unhealthy weight control behaviors (vomiting, laxative use, excessive exercise) that increase binge eating risk, and (2) excessive valuation of high-calorie foods, which maintains binge eating. The investigators propose to evaluate a treatment that addresses these hypothesized maintenance processes. Two pilot trials evaluated a novel 8-session group dissonance-based treatment (Counter Attitudinal Therapy; CAT) wherein women with any ED appropriate for outpatient care completed activities in which they collectively discuss costs of pursuing the thin ideal and the ED behaviors in which they personally engage (unhealthy weight control behaviors and binge eating), which putatively creates dissonance about engaging in those particular behaviors that reduce valuation of the thin ideal and high-calorie binge foods.

During the COVID-19 shelter-at-home orders taking place at both research sites, the investigators will not measure in-person only outcomes including fMRI, ECG, computerized implicit associated tests, and height and weight measurements for all participants that have assessments during this order. The investigators will continue to conduct treatment groups that will be administered on a virtual platform.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97403
        • Oregon Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 34 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Study Population

Subjects for the initial R61 phase will be 60 women over 18 years with body image and eating problems interested in participating in a trial of interventions aimed at improving body image and eating disorders, and for the R33 phase will consist of 120 women with DSM-5 eating disorders.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5 eating disorder
  • Must have a primary care doctor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speakers
  • BMI <75% ideal body weight
  • Current acute suicidal ideation (defined as thoughts of a specific method or plan)
  • Comorbid psychiatric disorder that would disrupt groups (e.g., bipolar disorder, substance misuse)
  • Serious medical problems (e.g., diabetes)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Body Project Treatment
An 8-session group-delivered eating disorder treatment that seeks to reduce valuation of the thin ideal and eating disordered behaviors used to pursue this ideal.
8 weekly 60 minute sessions of dissonance-based treatment wherein women with any eating disorder complete verbal, written, and behavioral activities.
Active Comparator: Interpersonal Psychotherapy
An 8-session group-delivered eating disorder treatment that seeks to improve interpersonal functioning because this is theorized to maintain eating pathology.
8 weekly 60 minute sessions of dissonance-based treatment wherein women with any eating disorder complete verbal, written, and behavioral activities.
8 weekly 60 minute sessions of interpersonal-based treatment wherein women with an eating disorder complete verbal, written, and behavioral activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in occurrences of binge eating episodes using Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview
Time Frame: Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Interviewer assesses frequency in binge eating episodes
Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Change in occurrences of compensatory weight control behavior using Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview
Time Frame: Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Interviewer assesses frequency of compensatory weight control behaviors
Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Change in psychosocial impairment due to eating disorder symptoms using the Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Interviewer assesses change in psychosocial impairment
Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in reward region of the brain using fMRI
Time Frame: Week 1 and Week 8
Assess if CAT produces larger pre-post reductions in reward region in response to thin models and binge food (Not collected during COVID-19 shelter-at-home order)
Week 1 and Week 8
Change in suicidal ideation/attempts using the Patient Health Questionnaire version 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 6
Assess if there are any changes in suicide ideation/attempts
Weeks 2, 4 and 6
Change in negative affect using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale-Revised
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Assess if there are any changes in negative affect
Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Change in body dissatisfaction using the Body Dissatisfaction Scale
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 6
Assess if there are any changes in body dissatisfaction
Weeks 2, 4 and 6
Change in food addiction using the Yale Food Addiction Scale version 2.0
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Assess if there are any changes in food addiction (Only collected during R61 phase)
Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Change in valuation of thin ideal using the Thin Ideal Valuation Scale
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Assess if there are any changes in valuation of the thin beauty ideal
Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Change in dietary restraint using the 10-item Dutch Restrained Eating Scale
Time Frame: Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Assess if there are any changes in dietary restraint
Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Change in implicit associations of binge foods, thin models, and eating disorder behavior words
Time Frame: Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up
Three implicit association tasks will assess response to binge foods, thin models, and eating disorder behavior words at pre- and post-test (Not collected during COVID-19 shelter-at-home order)
Week 8; R33 also reviews at 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Stice, PhD, Oregon Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MH111782
  • 1R61MH111782 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study data will be shared via the National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness (NDCT), which is part of the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). All data, with the exception of video recordings of the participants in treatment, will be provided.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Descriptive/raw data will be submitted while the study is ongoing (every 6 months). Analyzed data will be submitted either when results are published or after the completion of the award period, whichever comes first.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eating Disorder

Clinical Trials on Counter Attitudinal Therapy

Subscribe