Phase 2 Nab® -Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) (LAPACT)

March 18, 2019 updated by: Celgene

Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC): An International, Open-label, Multi-center, Phase 2 Study (LAPACT).

This clinical study is in subjects who are 18 years old or older with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who have not received prior treatment for their pancreatic cancer. The study treats all subjects with nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for approximately 6 months of treatment. Subjects who complete the treatment will choose, with their treating physicians, what additional treatment should be given: more nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, Chemoradiation therapy, or surgery to treat the locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an international, non-randomized, open-label, multi-center, Phase 2 study in subjects who are 18 years old or older with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who have not received prior treatment for their pancreatic cancer. All subjects will be treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for 6 cycles followed by an Investigator's Choice of continuation of treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, chemoradiation therapy, or surgery.

Safety assessments by laboratory testing and physical exams will be conducted through-out the study.

Efficacy assessments by physical exam will be preformed through-out the study and tumor imaging will be conducted approximately every 2 months.

Subjects will be considered active study participants from enrollment up to, but not including, survival follow-up period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

107

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N2
        • Tom Baker Cancer Center
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z2
        • Cross Cancer Institute
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
        • British Columbia Cancer Agency
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1S6
        • McGill University
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4M1
        • CHUM Hopital Saint-Luc
      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Centre Regional de lutte contre le cancer Paul Papin
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • CHRU Besançon
      • Besançon, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Belfort Montbeliard
      • Clichy cedex, France
        • Hopital Beaujon
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Hopital Saint Antoine
      • Pessac Cedex, France, 33604
        • Hôpital Haut Leveque
      • Benevento, Italy, 82100
        • Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesù Fatebenefratelli
      • Genova, Italy, 16132
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
      • Roma, Italy, 128
        • Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico Di Roma
      • A Coruna, Spain, 15006
        • Hospital Universitario A Coruña
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • ICO-HOSPITAL GERMANS TRIAS I PUJOL
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Hospital Miguel Servet
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic - Arizona
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • UC Davis Cancer Center
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92037
        • Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Cancer Center
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804
        • Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
        • Piedmont Cancer Institute PC
      • Newnan, Georgia, United States, 30265
        • Cancer Treatment Centers of America - Southeastern Regional Medical Center
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, United States, 04074
        • ME Center for Cancer Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • TUFTS - New England Medical Center
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
        • Saint Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Karmanos Cancer Center Wayne State University
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07962
        • Regional Cancer Care Associates LLC
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
        • Clinical Research Alliance
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13215
        • State University of New York Upstate Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Levine Cancer Institute
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43219
        • Mark H Zangmeister Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-5505
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non- metastasis, unresectable, adenocarcinoma pancreatic cancer patients
  • No prior anticancer therapy for pancreatic cancer

    •≥ 18 years of age with a performance status of 0 or 1•Adequate complete blood counts, hepatic function, and renal function

  • Signed informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection
  • Infection with hepatitis B or C, or history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or receiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive
  • Subjects with sensory neuropathy, ascites, or plastic biliary stent.
  • Serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems, or serious psychiatric disorders (including but not limited to connective tissue disorders, lung disease, and cardiac or seizure disorders)
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine

nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle Subjects who complete 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator will then determine the best option for the subject.

  • Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR
  • Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR
  • Surgical intervention
Other Names:
  • Gemzar
Other Names:
  • Abraxane
Surgical intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Time Frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)

TTF was defined as the time after the first dose of study therapy to discontinuation of study therapy due to disease progression, death by any cause, or the start of a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy/surgery. If a participant does not progress, die or start a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy, the participant was censored on the last tumor assessment date.

Tumor evaluations of CT or MRI scans were assessed by the investigative sites and response determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1.

The definition for progressive disease (PD) was >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir, and the sum showed an absolute increase of >= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression.

Median and its 90% confidence interval (CI) of TTF were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR or SD from of date of first treatment to 16 weeks. Tumor assessments after start of non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy were excluded.

RECIST 1.1 Definition:

  • CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed.
  • PR: a >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed.
  • SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for PD.

The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method.

Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1
Time Frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants that achieved a combined incidence of complete (CR) and partial response (PR) using RECIST 1.1 guidelines as assessed by the investigator. Assessments after new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy are excluded. For participants who had resectable surgery in Investigator Choice period, assessments after surgical intervention are excluded.

RECIST 1.1 Definition:

  • CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed.
  • PR: a >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed.

The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method

Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of disease progression or death (by any cause), whichever is earlier. The analysis day was calculated from enrollment date for one participant who was not treated. Participants who have no disease progression or have not died were censored to last tumor assessment date with progression-free.

The definition for progressive disease (PD) was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir; the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of >= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression.

Median and its 90% confidence interval of PFS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study therapy to the date of death (by any cause). Participants who were alive at the end of study or clinical data cut were censored on the last known time that the participant was alive or the clinical cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Median and its 90% confidence interval of OS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley
Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up)
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. In the Global Health Status and 5 functional scales, 0 = worst possible quality of life/health status and 100 = best possible quality of life/health status. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: >=10 increase from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease >10 - Worsened: >=10 decrease from baseline
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom Items
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. In the symptom scales and single symptom items, 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: >=10 decrease from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease >10 - Worsened: >=10 increase from baseline
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary Scales
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Six summary scales reported are: - Pancreatic Pain - Digestive Symptoms - Altered Bowel Habits - Hepatic Scale - Body Image - Sexuality Scores of 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline. Responder categories: - Improved: >=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease >MID - Worsened: >=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The summary scale for Satisfaction with Health Care is reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = not satisfied, worst possible health state and 100 = extremely satisfied, best possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: >=MID increase from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease >MID - Worsened: >=MID decrease from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item Scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The 10 individual item scores are reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = best possible health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: >=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease >MID - Worsened: >=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 of study drug up to end of the study; up to 31.3 months
TEAEs are defined as any adverse event (AE) that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug or procedure of the study period through the maximum duration of the period plus 28 days. The severity of AEs was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and the scale: Grade 1 = Mild Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. Relation to study drug was determined by the investigator. A treatment-related TEAE is defined as TEAE which was considered to be related to one or both of the study drugs and reported as 'Suspected' on the case report form. AEs with a missing relationship were treated as 'treatment-related' in data summaries. IP (investigational product) refers to nab-Paclitaxel and/or Gemcitabine. "Related" TEAE refers to relation to study drug (IP).
Day 1 of study drug up to end of the study; up to 31.3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Teng Jin Ong, MD, Celgene

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 21, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Gemcitabine

3
Subscribe