Entospletinib Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (ENTO in AML)

November 13, 2019 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 1b/2 Study of Entospletinib (GS-9973) Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of entospletinib when administered as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

148

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Princess Margaret
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Jewish General Hospital
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik II
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
        • UCLA
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • University of Chicago
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States
        • Loyola University Medical Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
        • Indiana University
    • Kansas
      • Fairway, Kansas, United States
        • University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
        • Henry Ford Health System
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
        • Karmanos Cancer Institute
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
        • Weill Cornell Medical College - New York - Presbyterian Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
        • Duke Cancer Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
        • Ohio State University
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States
        • Saint Francis Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with AML in need of treatment
  • Group A : Individuals ≥ 18 years of age with previously untreated AML by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria who are able and should receive up to 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy with 7+3 as determined by the treating physician
  • Group B: Individuals > 70 years of age with previously untreated AML by WHO criteria; or individuals ≤ 70 years of age with previously untreated AML who refuse or are unable to receive chemotherapy with 7+3 as determined by the treating physician
  • Group C: Individuals ≥ 18 years of age with relapsed/refractory AML by WHO criteria; or with relapsed/refractory AML with mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL); or with previously untreated AML by WHO criteria and who would have met disease eligibility criteria for Group A or B but refuse or are unable to receive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agent as determined by the treating physician

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known active central nervous system or leptomeningeal lymphoma
  • Subjects with acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3)
  • Treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) within 7 days prior to enrollment.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Entospletinib + daunorubicin + cytarabine (Group A)

Dose Escalation: Entospletinib up to 400 mg for 14 days and then entospletinib up to 400 mg in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine for up to two 14-day cycles.

Dose Expansion: Entospletinib 400 mg for 14 days and then entospletinib 400 mg in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine for up to two 14-day cycles. Some participants will have the option to receive post-induction therapy with entospletinib 400 mg in combination with cytarabine/cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C). Participants may receive maintenance therapy with 28-day cycles of entospletinib 400 mg for up to twelve 28-day cycles, if the participant is not eligible for stem cell transplant.

Tablet(s) administered orally every 12 hours
Other Names:
  • GS-9973
  • ENTO
60 mg/m^2 administered intravenously daily on Days 1 to 3 for up to two 14-day induction cycles
100 mg/m^2 administered intravenously daily on Days 1 to 7 for up to two 14-day cycles
Experimental: Entospletinib + decitabine (Group B)

Dose Escalation: Entospletinib 400 mg for 14 days and then entospletinib 400 mg in combination with decitabine for 10 days beginning on Day 1 of every 28-day cycle (at least 2 cycles of induction therapy but no more than 4 cycles). Participants who are intolerant of decitabine may switch to entospletinib monotherapy maintenance at any time after completing the first 2 cycles.

Dose Expansion: Entospletinib 400 mg for 14 days for the safety run-in participants or Entospletinib 400 mg for 5 days for the randomization participants. Then entospletinib 400 mg in combination with decitabine or azacitidine (at least 2 cycles of induction therapy but no more than 4 cycles). Some participants will have the option to receive maintenance therapy with entospletinib in combination with decitabine or azacitidine. Participants who are intolerant of decitabine or azacitidine may switch to entospletinib monotherapy maintenance at any time after completing the first 2 cycles.

Tablet(s) administered orally every 12 hours
Other Names:
  • GS-9973
  • ENTO
20 mg/m^2 administered intravenously
75 mg/m^2 administered intravenously or subcutaneously
Experimental: Entospletinib (Group C)

Dose Escalation: Entospletinib up to 800 mg for 28-day cycles until the participant meets criteria for study treatment discontinuation per the study protocol.

Dose Expansion: Entospletinib 400 mg for 28-day cycles until the participant meets criteria for study treatment discontinuation per the protocol.

Tablet(s) administered orally every 12 hours
Other Names:
  • GS-9973
  • ENTO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: Group A: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 28; Group B: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28; Group C: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28 (Cycle length: for Cycle 0 = 14 days, for all other cycles = 28 days)
DLTs refer to toxicities experienced during the first 28 days of study treatment that have been judged to be clinically significant and related to study treatment. DLT assessment was applicable only for Phase 1b and Phase 2 safety run-in participants.
Group A: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 28; Group B: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28; Group C: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28 (Cycle length: for Cycle 0 = 14 days, for all other cycles = 28 days)
Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) at the End of Induction
Time Frame: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Morphologic CR included CR and cytogenetic CR (CRc). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/microliter (mcL); Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis.
At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission at the End of Induction
Time Frame: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Composite complete remission included CR, CRc, and morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets.
At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction
Time Frame: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Overall response included CR, CRc, CRi, and partial remission (PR). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets. PR required all of the following: ≥ 50% decrease in blasts in bone marrow aspirate to a range of 5% to 25%; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; Independent of transfusions; and A value of ≤ 5% blasts was also considered a PR if Auer rods were detected.
At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Exposure of Entospletinib
Time Frame: First dose date up to approximately 3 years
First dose date up to approximately 3 years
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Time Frame: First dose date up to approximately 38 months
EFS was defined as the time interval from the start of the study therapy until the date of treatment failure, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who received other anti-cancer therapy (prior to the event if any) were censored. Median EFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
First dose date up to approximately 38 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: First dose date up to approximately 38 months
OS was defined as the time interval from the start of the study therapy to death from any cause. Median OS was analyzed using KM method.
First dose date up to approximately 38 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)
First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least one toxicity grade from baseline. The most severe graded abnormality from all tests was counted for each participant.
First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Entospletinib

3
Subscribe