Phase III Study of Vinflunine Plus Methotrexate Versus Methotrexate Alone in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

February 13, 2019 updated by: Pierre Fabre Medicament

Phase III Study of IV Vinflunine in Combination With Methotrexate Versus Methotrexate Alone in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Previously Treated With Platinum-based Chemotherapy

For patients relapsing after platinum-based therapy, few data are available. The current use of cetuximab associated with radiotherapy in localized disease and associated with platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting stresses the need for new therapeutic options at later stages of SCCHN.Vinca-alkaloids demonstrated activity in SCCHN. Vinflunine demonstrated superior antitumour activity to vinorelbine in preclinical animal models. Recent preliminary phase I results of the vinflunine plus methotrexate combination in SCCHN, based on a clinical review, show encouraging antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile. Therefore the combination of vinflunine and methotrexate appears a promising salvage regimen after platinum failure.

The present study has been designed as a multicenter, randomised phase III study which will compare the combination of IV vinflunine with methotrexate to methotrexate alone in SCCHN patients having failed platinum-based therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed to compare the OS of VFL plus MTX versus MTX alone in patients with SCCHN who had failed platinum-based chemotherapy.

The trial was designed in accordance with current standards used routinely in oncology phase III trials and used established methods of assessment. The RECIST (version 1.1) and NCI CTCAE (version 3.0) guidelines are internationally recognised methods for assessing efficacy and tolerance, respectively.

The patient population was appropriate for this type of phase III study and included adult patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, who had received prior chemotherapy regimens with documented progression. This population of patients was considered appropriate to meet the study objectives.

Recent preliminary phase I results of the VFL plus MTX combination in SCCHN, reported in a clinical review, showed encouraging antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile A number of chemotherapy agents have been reported as having single-agent activity in SCCHN. However, reliable evidence of efficacy in the second-line setting is lacking, and there is currently no established standard of care. MTX used alone as the reference regimen at a dose of 40 mg/m2/week can be considered as the best available evidence-based option. Also, other trials using this comparator have demonstrated that it is generally accepted as a reasonable choice, and is often used in general practice.

The efficacy and safety assessments employed in this study are standard measures routinely used in studies of this type

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

459

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France
        • Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma
  • Documented progressive disease after chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced or recurrent/metastatic SCCHN which included a platinum derivative
  • Measurable or non measurable disease
  • adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions
  • WHO performance status < 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • History of brain or leptomeningeal involvement
  • Albumin level < 35 g/L
  • Patients with weight loss ≥ 5% within the last 3 months
  • Grade > 2 peripheral neuropathy at study entry
  • "Third space" fluids (pleural effusion, ascites, massive edema)
  • Prior treatment with vinca-alkaloids and methotrexate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vinflunine plus methotrexate
vinflunine IV 280 mg/m² Day 1 plus methotrexate IV 30 mg/m² Day 1 and Day 8 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • JAVLOR
  • VFL
Active Comparator: Methotrexate
methotrexate IV 40 mg/m² Day 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • MTX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival in the ITT Population (Months)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed till death (if they are not lost for follow-up), an expected average of 7.5 months
Time from randomization to the date of death or last follow-up. The survival duration of patients still alive, was censored at the date of last contact or last follow-up.
Participants will be followed till death (if they are not lost for follow-up), an expected average of 7.5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: an expected average of 4 months
Time measured from the date of randomisation until date of progression or death from any cause (whichever came first)
an expected average of 4 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The objective response is defined as the best response designation recorded across all time points from the date of randomisation until disease progression.
6 weeks
Disease Control Rate
Time Frame: 30 months
Percentage of best overall responses CR, PR and SD in the analysed population
30 months
Duration of Response
Time Frame: 30 months
Duration of objective response will be measured for responders (CR+PR) from the time for CR or PR until the 1st date of documentation of recurrent or progressive disease or the date of death any cause.
30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zahida Issiakhem, MD, Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Methotrexate

Subscribe