- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02378493
Evaluation of the Antibiofilmogramme® Test During Diabetic Foot Infections (BioFilm PieDia)
This is an observational study that does not change routine care.
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the role of antibiogramme-antibiofilmogramme concordance (in terms of S. aureus strains and prescribed antibiotics) in the presence/absence of S. aureus strains at the end of a first regimen of antibiotics.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The secondary objectives are:
A. Should a first regimen of antibiotics fail, to describe the bacterial community present in the wound, and its potential to create biofilms.
B. To investigate the role of antibiogramme-antibiofilmogramme concordance (in terms of S. aureus strains and prescribed antibiotics) in wound healing.
C. To study the potential role of additional antibiofilmogramme data, as well as that of other pre-defined co-factors, in predicting wound changes.
D. Create an S. aureus strain collection for future ancillary studies.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
- CHU de Clermont-Ferrand - Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied
-
Lyon, France, 69317
- CHU de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
-
Nantes, France
- CHU
-
Nîmes, France, 30029
- CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
-
Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
- CHU de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
-
Strasbourg, France, 67091
- CHRU de Strasbourg - Hôpital Civil
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 7 to 10 weeks of follow-up
- Patient with a foot wound (at least stage 2 or more) that is infected by at least 1 strain of S. aureus
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is participating in, or has participated in within the past 3 months, another interventional study, or is currently in an exclusion period determined by a preceding study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- Emergency situation precluding correct study implementation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exposure: Concordance between tests
The study population is composed of diabetic patients with foot wounds (at least stage >=2) that are infected by at least 1 strain of S. aureus. Patients whose antibiogrammes and Antibiofilmogrammes are concordant will fall into this group (the "exposed" group). Upon inclusion, 1) all patients' wounds will be sampled, and 2) the associated bacterial strains identified via Vitek and 3) antibiograms performed; the latter are all part of routine procedure. 4) S. aureus isolates will be further analysed via an antiobiofilmogramme, which is an experimental element added by this research. At the end of the 1st regimen of antibiotics prescribed, if the treatment failed steps 1 to 4 can be repeated. 30 days after the end of the 1st regimen of antibiotics prescribed, steps 1 to 4 are systematically performed. |
An Antibiofilmogramme (BioFilm Control) evaluates the capacity of a series of antibiotics to inhibit the growth of bacterial biofilms for a given bacterial isolate.
|
|
Experimental: Non exposure: Not concordance between tests.
The study population is composed of diabetic patients with foot wounds (at least stage >=2) that are infected by at least 1 strain of S. aureus. Patients who do not fall into the concordance (exposure) group, will fall into the non exposure group. The latter includes semi-concordance or discordance between antibiogrammes and Antiobiofilmogrammes. Upon inclusion, 1) all patients' wounds will be sampled, and 2) the associated bacterial strains identified via Vitek and 3) antibiograms performed; the latter are all part of routine procedure. 4) S. aureus isolates will be further analysed via an antiobiofilmogramme, which is an experimental element added by this research. At the end of the 1st regimen of antibiotics prescribed, if the treatment failed steps 1 to 4 can be repeated. 30 days after the end of the 1st regimen of antibiotics prescribed, steps 1 to 4 are systematically performed. |
An Antibiofilmogramme (BioFilm Control) evaluates the capacity of a series of antibiotics to inhibit the growth of bacterial biofilms for a given bacterial isolate.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Presence/absence of S. aureus strains in the wound
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
|
Antibiofilmogramme results
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Qualitative results per antibiotic type and dose: classification as sensitive, intermediate, resistance.
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
Antibiogram results
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Qualitative results per antibiotic type and dose: classification as sensitive, intermediate, resistance.
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Presence/absence of S. aureus strains in the wound
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Presence/absence of S. aureus strains in the wound
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
|
Antibiofilmogramme results
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
Qualitative results per antibiotic type and dose: classification as sensitive, intermediate, resistance.
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
Antibiofilmogramme results
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
Qualitative results per antibiotic type and dose: classification as sensitive, intermediate, resistance.
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
Antibiogram results
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
Qualitative results per antibiotic type and dose: classification as sensitive, intermediate, resistance.
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
Antibiogram results
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
Qualitative results per antibiotic type and dose: classification as sensitive, intermediate, resistance.
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
Wound surface area (mm^2)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
|
Wound surface area (mm^2)
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
|
Wound surface area (mm^2)
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
|
Wound depth (mm)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
|
Wound depth (mm)
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
|
Wound depth (mm)
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
|
The surface area of the wound has decreased by 40% compared to initial size: yes/no.
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
|
The number of bacterial strains detected in the wound.
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
|
The number of bacterial strains detected in the wound.
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
|
The number of bacterial strains detected in the wound.
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
|
The capacity of the S. aureus strains isolated to create biofilms in the presence of antibiotics
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Score varying from 0 to 80
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
The capacity of the S. aureus strains isolated to create biofilms in the presence of antibiotics
Time Frame: At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
Score varying from 0 to 80
|
At the end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
The capacity of the S. aureus strains isolated to create biofilms in the presence of antibiotics
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
Score varying from 0 to 80
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Age (years)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
Sex (m/f)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
Antiobiotics taken
Time Frame: During the treatment period (expected average of 21 days)
|
During the treatment period (expected average of 21 days)
|
|
% glycated hemoglobin
Time Frame: 30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
30 days after end of 1st antibiotics (expected average of 51 days)
|
|
Systolic pressure index at the toe (ratio)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
|
Perception threshold for vibrations at the ankle (Hz)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0)
|
Baseline (Day 0)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Albert Sotto, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dunyach-Remy C, Ngba Essebe C, Sotto A, Lavigne JP. Staphylococcus aureus Toxins and Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Role in Pathogenesis and Interest in Diagnosis. Toxins (Basel). 2016 Jul 7;8(7):209. doi: 10.3390/toxins8070209.
- Sotto A, Laurent F, Schuldiner S, Vouillarmet J, Corvec S, Bemer P, Boutoille D, Dunyach-Remy C, Lavigne JP. Evaluation of the Use of Antibiofilmogram Technology in the Clinical Evolution of Foot Ulcers Infected by Staphylococcus aureus in Persons Living with Diabetes: A Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 17;10(24):5928. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245928.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Infections
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Diabetic Angiopathies
- Diabetes Complications
- Skin Diseases
- Skin Ulcer
- Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
- Bacterial Infections
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Leg Ulcer
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Foot Ulcer
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Staphylococcal Infections
- Diabetic Foot
Other Study ID Numbers
- LOCAL/2014/AS-01b
- 2014-A01745-42 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.