A Study of ASP2215 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase (FLT3) Mutation

March 21, 2024 updated by: Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study of ASP2215 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With FLT3 Mutation

The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical benefit of ASP2215 therapy in participants with FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are refractory to or have relapsed after first-line AML therapy as shown with overall survival (OS) compared to salvage chemotherapy, and to determine the efficacy of ASP2215 therapy as assessed by the rate of complete remission and complete remission with partial hematological recovery (CR/CRh) in these participants.

This study will also determine the overall efficacy in event-free survival (EFS) and complete remission (CR) rate of ASP2215 compared to salvage chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants considered an adult according to local regulations at the time of signing informed consent may participate in this study. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive ASP2215 or salvage chemotherapy. Participants will enter the screening period up to 14 days prior to the start of treatment. Prior to randomization, a salvage chemotherapy regimen will be pre-selected for each participant; options will include low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC), azacitidine, mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC), or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). The randomization will be stratified by response to first-line therapy and pre-selected salvage chemotherapy. Participants will be administered treatment over continuous 28-day cycles.

After treatment discontinuation, participants will have a pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)/end-of-treatment visit within 7 days after treatment discontinuation, followed by a 30-day follow-up for safety, in which a telephone contact with the participant is sufficient unless any assessment must be repeated for resolution of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). After that, long term follow-up will be done every 3 months up to 3 years from the participant's end-of-treatment visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

371

Phase

  • Phase 3

Expanded Access

Approved for sale to the public. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yvoir, Belgium, 5530
        • Site BE32002
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G3
        • Site CA15004
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8V 1C3
        • Site CA15001
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Site CA15015
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Site CA15003
      • Brest, France, 29609
        • Site FR33013
      • Le Chesnay Cedex, France, 78157
        • Site FR33002
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Site FR33010
      • Pessac, France, 33604
        • Site FR33009
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Site FR33014
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Site FR33008
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Site DE49009
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Site DE49011
      • Marburg, Germany, 35043
        • Site DE49003
      • Munchen, Germany, 81737
        • Site DE49002
      • Tubingen, Germany, 72076
        • Site DE49010
      • Ashkelon, Israel, 78278
        • Site IL97201
      • Haifa, Israel, 31096
        • Site IL97209
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91031
        • Site IL97203
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Site IL97210
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100
        • Site IL97206
      • Rehovot, Israel, 76100
        • Site IL97208
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Site IT39005
      • Brescia, Italy, 25126
        • Site IT39010
      • Milan, Italy, 20132
        • Site IT39001
      • Palermo, Italy, 90146
        • Site IT39004
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • Site IT39011
      • Roma, Italy, 00189
        • Site IT39007
      • Varese, Italy, 21100
        • Site IT39002
      • Akita, Japan
        • Site JP81023
      • Aomori, Japan
        • Site JP81021
      • Kumamoto, Japan
        • Site JP81013
      • Kyoto, Japan
        • Site JP81025
      • Nagasaki, Japan
        • Site JP81008
      • Okayama, Japan
        • Site JP81024
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Site JP81011
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
        • Site JP81002
    • Chiba
      • Narita, Chiba, Japan
        • Site JP81010
    • Fukui
      • Yoshida-gun, Fukui, Japan
        • Site JP81026
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
        • Site JP81016
    • Hyogo
      • Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
        • Site JP81018
    • Ibaraki
      • Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
        • Site JP81017
    • Kanagawa
      • Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Site JP81009
      • Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Site JP81006
    • Miyagi
      • Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
        • Site JP81012
    • Okayama
      • Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
        • Site JP81007
    • Osaka
      • Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
        • Site JP81014
    • Saitama
      • Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
        • Site JP81020
    • Tochigi
      • Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
        • Site JP81027
    • Tokyo
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Site JP81005
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Site JP81004
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Site JP81022
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 602739
        • Site KR82010
      • Goyang, Korea, Republic of, 602-715
        • Site KR82009
      • Jeollanam-do, Korea, Republic of, 519-809
        • Site KR82003
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Site KR82007
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Site KR82004
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135710
        • Site KR82001
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137701
        • Site KR82002
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Site KR82008
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 156-707
        • Site KR82011
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 443380
        • Site KR82005
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-952
        • Site PL48002
      • Opole, Poland, 45-372
        • Site PL48005
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-367
        • Site PL48004
      • Badalona, Spain, 08025
        • Site ES34009
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Site ES34011
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Site ES34012
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Site ES34010
      • Girona, Spain, 17007
        • Site ES34016
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 08907
        • Site ES34005
      • Salamanca, Spain, 37007
        • Site ES34014
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Site ES34017
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 112
        • Site TW88606
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83301
        • Site TW88604
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 404
        • Site TW88608
      • Taichung City, Taiwan, 40705
        • Site TW88609
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • Site TW88601
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
        • Site TW88603
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10449
        • Site TW88610
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Site TW88611
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 114
        • Site TW88602
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33305
        • Site TW88605
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Site TR90001
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06500
        • Site TR90004
      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom, BH7 7DW
        • Site GB44014
      • Harrow, United Kingdom, HA1 3UJ
        • Site GB44013
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Site GB44003
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom, PL6 8DH
        • Site GB44015
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294-0006
        • Site US10011
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1752
        • Site US10012
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Site US10076
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Site US10073
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06504
        • Site US10067
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • Site US10045
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Site US10081
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • Site US10006
    • Kansas
      • Westwood, Kansas, United States, 66205
        • Site US10075
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Site US10074
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Site US10048
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Site US10005
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Site US10034
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Site US10022
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Site US10085
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Site US10087
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Site US10057
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756-1000
        • Site US10023
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Site US10027
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • Site US10077
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Site US10001
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Site US10037
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Site US10008
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Site US10013
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Site US10072
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Site US10046
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Site US10024
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Site US10078
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Site US10044
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Site US10084
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Site US10058
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Site US10041
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Site US10010
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Site US10080
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Site US10014
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-0656
        • Site US10063
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Site US10035

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a diagnosis of primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to WHO classification (2008) as determined by pathology review at the treating institute.
  • Participant is refractory to or relapsed after first-line AML therapy (with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)).

    • Refractory to first-line AML therapy is defined as:

      1. Participant did not achieve complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery/complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CR/CRi/CRp) under initial therapy. A Participant eligible for standard therapy must receive at least one cycle of an anthracycline containing induction block in standard dose for the selected induction regimen. A Participant not eligible for standard therapy must have received at least one complete block of induction therapy seen as the optimum choice of therapy to induce remission for this subject.

    • Untreated first hematologic relapse is defined as:

      1. Participant must have achieved a CR/CRi/CRp (criteria as defined by [Cheson et al, 2003], see Section 5.3) with first line treatment and has hematologic relapse.
  • Participant is positive for FLT3 mutation in bone marrow or whole blood as determined by the central lab. A Participant with rapidly proliferative disease and unable to wait for the central lab results can be enrolled based on a local test performed after completion of the last interventional treatment. Participants can be enrolled from a local test result if they have any of the following FLT3 mutations: FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD), FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD)/D835 or FLT3- TKD/I836.
  • Participant has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
  • Participant is eligible for pre-selected salvage chemotherapy.
  • Participant must meet the following criteria as indicated on the clinical laboratory tests:

    • Serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of > 50 mL/min as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation.
  • Participant is suitable for oral administration of study drug.
  • Female Participant must either:

    • Be of non-child bearing potential:

      1. post-menopausal (defined as at least 1 year without any menses) prior to Screening, or
      2. documented as surgically sterile (at least 1 month prior to Screening)
    • Or, if of childbearing potential,

      1. Agree not to try to become pregnant during the study and for 180 days after the final study administration
      2. And have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening
      3. And, if heterosexually active, agree to consistently use highly effective contraception per locally accepted standards in addition to a barrier method starting at Screening and throughout the study period and for 180 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female Participant must agree not to breastfeed at Screening and throughout the study period and for 60 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female Participant must not donate ova starting at Screening and throughout the study period and for 180 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Male Participant and their female partners who are of childbearing potential must be using highly effective contraception per locally accepted standards in addition to a barrier method starting at Screening and continue throughout the study period and for 120 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Male Participant must not donate sperm starting at Screening and throughout the study period and 120 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Participant agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant was diagnosed as acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).
  • Participant has BCR-ABL-positive leukemia (chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis).
  • Participant has AML secondary to prior chemotherapy for other neoplasms (except for MDS).
  • Participant is in second or later hematologic relapse or has received salvage therapy for refractory disease
  • Participant has clinically active central nervous system leukemia.
  • Participant has been diagnosed with another malignancy, unless disease-free for at least 5 years. Participants with treated nonmelanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, regardless of the disease-free duration, are eligible for this study if definitive treatment for the condition has been completed. Participants with organ-confined prostate cancer with no evidence of recurrent or progressive disease are eligible if hormonal therapy has been initiated or the malignancy has been surgically removed or treated with definitive radiotherapy.
  • Participant has received prior treatment with ASP2215 or other FLT3 inhibitors (with the exception of sorafenib and midostaurin used in first-line therapy regimen as part of induction, consolidation, and/or maintenance).
  • Participant has clinically significant abnormality of coagulation profile, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
  • Participant has had major surgery within 4 weeks prior to the first study dose.
  • Participant has radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to the first study dose.
  • Participant has congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4, or Participant with a history of congestive heart failure NYHA class 3 or 4 in the past, unless a screening echocardiogram performed within 3 months prior to study entry results in a left ventricular ejection fraction that is ≥ 45%.
  • Participant requires treatment with concomitant drugs that are strong inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A.
  • Participants with mean of triplicate Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) > 450 ms at Screening based on central reading.
  • Participants with Long QT Syndrome at Screening.
  • Participants with hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia at Screening (defined as values below lower limit of normal [LLN]).
  • Participant requires treatment with concomitant drugs that are strong inhibitors or inducers of P glycoprotein (P-gp) with the exception of drugs that are considered absolutely essential for the care of the subject.
  • Participant requires treatment with concomitant drugs that target serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1 (5HT1R) or 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5HT2BR) or sigma nonspecific receptor with the exception of drugs that are considered absolutely essential for the care of the subject.
  • Participant has an active uncontrolled infection.
  • Participant is known to have human immunodeficiency virus infection.
  • Participant has active hepatitis B or C, or other active hepatic disorder.
  • Participant has any condition which makes the Participant unsuitable for study participation.
  • Participant has active clinically significant GVHD or is on treatment with systemic corticosteroids for GVHD.
  • Participant has an FLT3 mutation other than the following: FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD/D835 or FLT3-TKD/I836.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gilteritinib
Participants received 120 mg dose (3 tablets of 40 mg) orally once a day in continuous 28-day cycles, at least 2 hours after or 1 hour before food. Gilteritinib treatment continued until participants met one of the treatment discontinuation criteria.
tablet, oral
Other Names:
  • ASP2215
  • XOSPATA®
Active Comparator: Salvage Chemotherapy
Participants received chemotherapy in 28-day cycles. Participants on Low-Dose Cytarabine (LoDAC) received 20 mg of cytarabine twice daily by subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) injection for 10 days. Participants on azacitidine received 75 mg/m^2 daily by SC or IV injection for 7 days. Participants on LoDAC or azacitidine treatment continued until they met discontinuation criteria. Participants on MEC chemotherapy received mitoxantrone 8 mg/m^2 daily by IV for 5 days, etoposide 100 mg/m^2 daily by IV for 5 days and cytarabine 1000 mg/m^2 daily by IV for 5 days (days 1-5). Participants on FLAG-IDA chemotherapy received G-CSF 300 μg/m^2 daily by SC/IV for 5 days (days 1-5), fludarabine 30 mg/m^2 daily by IV for 5 days (days 2-6), cytarabine 2000 mg/m^2 daily by IV for 5 days (days 2-6) and idarubicin 10 mg/m^2 daily by IV for 3 days (days 2-4). Participants receiving MEC or FLAG-IDA received 1 cycle of therapy and were assessed for response on or after day 15.
subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) injection
SC or IV injection
IV injection
SC (G-CSF) and IV (Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Idarubicin) injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (death date - randomization date + 1). For a participant who was not known to have died by the end of study follow-up, OS was censored at the date of last contact (date of last contact - randomized date + 1). The date of last contact was the latest date that the participant was known to be alive by the cutoff date. The last contact date was derived for participants alive at the analysis cutoff date. Survival rate and 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Greenwood formula.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission and Complete Remission With Partial Hematological Recovery (CR/CRh) in the Gilteritinib Arm
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date 04 Aug 2017, the 142 patients included in the primary analysis of CR/CRh rate were followed up at least 112 days
The CR/CRh rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved either CR or CRh at any of the postbaseline visits divided by the number of participants in the analysis population.
From randomization until the data cut-off date 04 Aug 2017, the 142 patients included in the primary analysis of CR/CRh rate were followed up at least 112 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Event-Free Survival (EFS)
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
EFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse (excluding relapse after PR), treatment failure or death from any cause within 30 days after the last dose of study drug, whichever occurred first (earliest of [relapse date, treatment failure date, death date] - randomization date + 1). If a participant experienced relapse or death within 30 days after the last dose of study drug, the participant was defined as having an EFS event related to either "relapse" or "death", and the event date was the date of relapse or death. For a participant who was not known to have had a relapse or treatment failure or death event, EFS was censored at the date of last relapse-free disease assessment (last relapse-free disease assessment date - randomization date + 1). Data was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, all participants included in the primary analysis of CR rate were followed up at least 6 months
The CR rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved the best response of CR divided by the number of participants in the analysis population.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, all participants included in the primary analysis of CR rate were followed up at least 6 months
Duration of Leukemia-Free Survival (LFS)
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
The LFS was defined as the time from the date of first CRc until the date of documented relapse (excluding relapse from PR) or death for participants who achieved CRc (relapse date or death date - first CRc disease assessment date + 1). For a participant who was not known to have relapsed or died, LFS was censored on the date of last relapse-free disease assessment date (last relapse-free disease assessment date - first CRc disease assessment date + 1). For a participant who was not known to have relapsed or died, LFS was censored on the date of last relapse-free disease assessment date (last relapse-free disease assessment date - first CRc disease assessment date + 1).
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Duration of Remission
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Duration of remission included duration of composite complete remission (CRc), duration of complete remission (CR)/ complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), duration of CRh, duration of CR and duration of response (CRc + partial remission (PR). The duration of response was defined as the time from the date of either first CRc or PR until the date of documented relapse (i.e., the date of first NR after CRc or PR) for participants who achieved CRc or PR (relapse date - first CRc or PR disease assessment date + 1). Participants who died without report of relapse were considered nonevents and censored at their last relapse-free disease assessment date (last relapse-free disease assessment date - first CRc or PR disease assessment date + 1). Other participants who did not relapse during the study were considered nonevents and censored at the last relapse-free assessment date. Duration of CR was only applicable to participants with best overall response of CR.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission (CRc Rate)
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
CRc rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved the best response of CRc (CR,complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) divided by the number of participants in the analysis population.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Transplantation rate is defined as the percentage of participants undergoing Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) during the study period.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Time Frame: Baseline and cycle 1, day 8 and cycle 2 day 1 (up to data cut off date of 17 Sep 2018)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a screening tool designed to assess the severity and impact of fatigue on daily functioning of participants with cancer during the 24 hours. There are 9 items on the scale. The first three questions ask participants to rate their fatigues on a scale from 0 (no fatigue) - 10 (as bad as you can imagine), with higher scores indicating worse outcome. The remaining six questions ask participants to rate how much fatigue has interfered with their daily activities on a scale from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes). A global fatigue score can be obtained by averaging all the items on the BFI. The global BFI score will be calculated only if at least 5 of the 9 items are answered. A higher BFI fatigue score indicates worse outcome.
Baseline and cycle 1, day 8 and cycle 2 day 1 (up to data cut off date of 17 Sep 2018)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) With Partial Hematological Recovery (CRh)
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
CRh rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved CRh at any of the postbaseline visits and did not have a best response of CR divided by the number of participants in the analysis population.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Conversion and Maintenance
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median treatment duration for gilteritinib was (126.00 [4.0, 885.0]) days versus salvage chemotherapy 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days)
Transfusion conversion & maintenance rate was defined for gilteritinib arm. Participants were classified as transfusion independent if there were no RBC or platelet transfusions within 28 days prior to the first dose to 28 days after the first dose; otherwise they were classified as transfusion dependent at baseline. Participants were considered independent postbaseline if they had 1 consecutive 8 week period without any RBC or platelet transfusion from 29 days after the first dose until the last dose date. For participants who were on treatment ≤ 4 weeks or > 4 weeks but < 12 weeks and there was no RBC or platelet transfusion within postbaseline period, they were considered not evaluable; otherwise, they were considered postbaseline transfusion dependent. Transfusion conversion rate was defined for participants who had evaluable postbaseline transfusion status. Transfusion status (independent vs. dependent) at baseline and postbaseline was reported in a 2 by 2 contingency table.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median treatment duration for gilteritinib was (126.00 [4.0, 885.0]) days versus salvage chemotherapy 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (median treatment duration for gilteritinib was (126.00 [4.0, 885.0]) days versus salvage chemotherapy 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug (gilteritinib or salvage chemotherapy). If the AE occurred on day 1 and the onset check box was marked "Onset after first dose of study drug" or the onset check box was left blank, then the AE was considered treatment emergent. If the AE occurred on day 1 and the onset check box was marked "Onset before first dose of study drug", then the AE was not considered treatment emergent. Majority of salvage chemotherapy participants finished the study by cycle 2 of treatment, the duration of exposure was longer in the gilteritinib arm compared with the salvage chemotherapy arm (126.00 [4.0, 885.0] days versus 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days). The NCI-CTCAE is defined as National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (median treatment duration for gilteritinib was (126.00 [4.0, 885.0]) days versus salvage chemotherapy 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Executive Medical Director, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

April 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukemia, Acute Myeloid (AML)

Clinical Trials on gilteritinib

3
Subscribe