Compare Efficacy and Simplicity of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation With Fixed Dose Versus Adjusted Citrate Program

June 13, 2020 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Is Regional Citrate Anticoagulation With Fixed Citrate Blood Concentration More Effective and Easy-to-handle Than Adjusted-dose Protocol in Adult Critically Ill Patients? A Cohort Study

Anticoagulation is required to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Regional citrate anticoagulation has many advantages regarding bleeding risk and filter survival. However, in clinical practice, its use worldwide has been limited by cumbersome protocols . In order to establish a simple scheme for universal application. In Aug 2015, the investigators have adopted a new protocol using a fixed citrate concentration in the filter of about 4 mmol/L (called fixed group for short) instead of conventional adjusted citrate doses according to postfilter ionized calcium levels of less than 0.4mmol/l (adjusted group), and speculated the abilities on efficacy and safety as well as convenience.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Design: This study was conducted as a single-centre, cohort study. All patients older than 18 years of age who required veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) were consecutively screened forward (prospective) or backward (retrospective) from August, 2015 and until the expected sample size was reached.

Study protocol: Before and after implementation of a new protocol, apart from the flow rate of any supplementation (Anticoagulant-citrate-dextrose solution, 5% sodium bicarbonate injection and 10% calcium gluconate injection), CVVH was performed using same standards, including devices (Aquarius or Diapact® CRRT), venous catheter (a double lumen 12-F catheter, Arrow International Inc., USA), haemofilter (DIACAP Acute L, 2.0 m2, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany), commercial replacement fluids (Na+113, Cl-118, Mg++0.797, Ca++1.60, glucose 10.6mmo/l and zero bicarbonate; Qing-shan-li-kang pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. Cheng-du, China) and Anticoagulant-citrate-dextrose solution-A (ACD-A) (Na+ 224, citrate 113, bicarbonate 203mmol/l, Fresenius Kabi, Italy) as well as monitoring algorithm. The first sample of postfilter and systemic ionized calcium was done two hours after initiation of CVVH and every six to eight hours during the first 24 hours. Afterwards, these measurements were done according to clinical needs for maintaining normal ionized calcium levels and blood pH value.

The group of fixed citrate concentration: ACD-A was administered in the prefilter ahead of the blood pump and the infusion rate was fixed and set to meet a circuit citrate concentration of 4 mmol/l. Calcium Gluconate 10% Injection was infused through the return line of the circuit and the substitution flow was initiated with 0.8 mmol calcium per liter total effluent flow and then be adjusted to obtain systemic ionized calcium levels between 0.90 and 1.2 mmol/l. Sodium bicarbonate 5% injection was infused through the return line of the circuit and the substitution flow was initiated with 3.3% of replacement fluid flow and then be adjusted to obtain blood pH value in the normal range (7.35 to 7.45)

The group of adjusted citrate doses:ACD-A was administered in the prefilter ahead of the blood pump and the starting infusion rate was 2.5 % of blood flow and then be adjusted to obtain postfilter ionized calcium levels of less than 0.40 mmol/l. Calcium Gluconate 10% Injection was infused through the return line of the circuit and the substitution flow was initiated with 7.3% of ACD-A flow, and then be adjusted to obtain systemic ionized calcium levels between 0.90 and 1.2 mmol/l. Sodium bicarbonate 5% injection was infused through the return line of the circuit and the starting infusion rate was 4% of replacement fluid flow,and then be adjusted to obtain blood pH value in the normal range (7.35 to 7.45)

Statistical analyses: groups were compared by using Fisher's exact test, Student's t test or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test as appropriate. Circuit lifetime was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and survival curves distribution was compared with the Log Rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify factors associated with mean filter lifetime in all group patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • MICU of Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients older than 18 years of age who required CVVH were consecutively screened

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at the time of hemofiltration, insufficient data available or missing and running time less than 6 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: fixed citrate doses protocol
Fixed citrate doses protocol: Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution ( Na+ 224, citrate 113, bicarbonate 203mmol/l, Fresenius Kabi, Italy) was administered in the prefilter ahead of the blood pump, which was set to meet a circuit citrate concentration of 4 mmol/l (duration: the maximum time is 72 hrs).
fixed doses of anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution to meet a circuit citrate concentration of 4 mmol/l.
Other Names:
  • fixed citrate circuit concentration protocol
Active Comparator: adjusted citrate doses protocol
Adjusted citrate doses protocol: Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution ( Na+ 224, citrate 113, bicarbonate 203mmol/l, Fresenius Kabi, Italy) was administered in the prefilter ahead of the blood pump, which the starting infusion rate be set 2.5 % of blood flow ( dosage range: 160-250ml/h) and then be adjusted to obtain postfilter ionized calcium levels of less than 0.40 mmol/l (duration: the maximum time is 72 hrs. )
the starting infusion rate of anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution be set 2.5 % of blood flow and then be adjusted to obtain postfilter ionized calcium levels of less than 0.40 mmol/l.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the survival time of the first filter due to unexpected disconnection
Time Frame: the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
The interval (hours) of the installation and replacement of the first filter. The unexpected disconnection defined as filter clotting more than two grades or transmembranous pressure across the circuit exceeded >300 mmHg. The filters were changed routinely after 72 hours of CVVH treatment, so maximum survival time of the filter was recorded as 72 hrs.
the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the overall survival time of the first filter
Time Frame: the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
The interval (hours) of the installation and replacement of the first filter. The survival time derived from analysis of CVVH stopping for any cause. The reasons for CVVH stopping included unexpected disconnection (defined as filter clotting more than two grades or transmembranous pressure across the circuit exceeded >300 mmHg) and expected disconnection (such as scheduled, catheter malfunction, death or discharge, metabolic complications).The filters were changed routinely after 72 hours of CVVH treatment, so maximum survival time of the filter was recorded as 72 hrs.
the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
the frequency of change in the infusion pump rate of calcium gluconate 10% Injection
Time Frame: the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
recorded the change frequency (times per patient per hour ) in calcium gluconate infusion pump during the treatment period. Data were collected from records of the daily prescriptions.
the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
the frequency of change in the infusion pump rate of Sodium Bicarbonate 5% Injection
Time Frame: the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
recorded the change frequency (times per patient per hour) in bicarbonate infusion pump during the treatment period. Data were collected from records of the daily prescriptions.
the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
the frequency of change in the infusion pump rate of Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution
Time Frame: the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
recorded the change frequency (times per patient per hour ) in citrate infusion pump during the treatment period. Data were collected from records of the daily prescriptions.
the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
incidences of severe metabolic disorders
Time Frame: the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour
defined as metabolic alkalosis with blood's pH value >7.5, metabolic acidosis with blood's pH value < 7.25, hypocalcemia with ionized calcium < 0.7 mmol/L, hypercalcemia with total serum calcium ≥ 2.75mmol/L, hypernatremia with Na+ ≥ 150mmol/L), bleeding disorders (defined as the decline of hemoglobin 10g/l within 12 hours) and suspected citrate accumulation was identified as a total calcium/ionic calcium index ≥ 2.5
the time period on CVVH, maximum 72 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bin Du, Prof., Department of medical ICU,Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on fixed citrate doses protocol

Subscribe