- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04350359
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bladder (TTNS1yr)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to see how well TTNS works at preventing incontinence in people with paraplegia from SCI that perform intermittent catheterization to empty their bladder. This study will compare the effectiveness of TTNS at 2 doses, fixed-dose and variable-dose. It will also evaluate the frequency of use, 2 days weekly compared to 5 days weekly.
Based on our pilot trials, tibial nerve stimulation protocols use submotor current intensity with a duration of 200 µs and a frequency of 20Hz. The experimental group will use a submotor "variable dose." The fixed-dose group will use submotor at current intensity at 1mA and designated as "fixed-dose."
TTNS will be used 5 days weekly, per our pilot trial. At 4-months post-SCI, the subject will be instructed to switch to 2x daily if he or she was randomized into the variable dose group of 2 days weekly and thus continue to doing so for the remainder of study participation. Because there is support in the literature for reduced doses of tibial nerve stimulation required for maintenance (1-3x weekly), the RCT includes this frequency comparison arm. All subjects will continue for 1-year post-SCI.
Additionally, we are collecting surveys to help identify characteristics of people (resilience and confidence) and adherence to medication and TTNS use throughout the study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Argyrios Stampas, MD
- Phone Number: 713-797-5938
- Email: argyrios.stampas@uth.tmc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- Recruiting
- MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital
-
Contact:
- Inger Ljungberg, MPH
- Phone Number: 202-877-1694
- Email: Inger.H.Ljungberg@medstar.net
-
Principal Investigator:
- Suzzane Groah, MD., MSPH
-
Contact:
- Amanda Rounds, PhD
- Phone Number: 202-877-1591
- Email: amanda.k.rounds@medstar.net
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Recruiting
- TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center
-
Contact:
- Vanessa Bernal, CCRP
- Phone Number: 713-797-7636
- Email: Vanessa.Bernal@uth.tmc.edu
-
Contact:
- Megan Martinez, MS
- Phone Number: 713-799-5765
- Email: Megan.Martinez@uth.tmc.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Argyrios Stampas, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-75 years old
- Traumatic or non-traumatic SCI
- Admitted to inpatient rehabilitation within 6 weeks
- T9 level of injury and above who are at greatest risk of morbid NGB
- Regionally located to allow follow-up
- English or Spanish speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of genitourinary diagnoses (i.e. prostate hypertrophy, overactive bladder, cancer, etc.)
- History of central nervous system disorder (i.e. prior SCI, stroke, brain injury, Parkinson's disease, MS, etc.)
- History of peripheral neuropathy
- pre-SCI symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (numbness and/or tingling in feet, sharp/jabbing/burning pain in feet, sensitivity to touch, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, etc.)
- Pregnancy
- Known injury to the lumbosacral spinal cord or plexus, or pelvis with associated neuropathy
- concern for tibial nerve pathway injury
- absence of toe flexion or autonomic dysreflexia during electric stimulation test
- Potential for progressive SCI including neurodegenerative SCI, ALS, cancer myelopathy, Multiple sclerosis, transverse myelitis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Variable-dose TTNS Protocol 5 x week
TTNS protocol: Electrodes 2 inch by 2 inch will be placed according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode, verified with rhythmic flexion of the toes secondary to stimulation of the flexor digitorum and hallicus brevis. The intensity level will be set to the amperage immediately under the threshold for motor contraction. If there is no contraction seen, patients will be excluded. In addition, if the patient perceives pain, the intensity will be lowered until comfortable. Stimulation frequency of 20 Hz and pulse width of 200ms in continuous mode will be used. All participants will be instructed to use the device for 30 minutes, 5 days per week for the first 4 months post-sci. |
Electrodes 2 inch by 2 inch will be placed according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode, verified with rhythmic flexion of the toes secondary to stimulation of the flexor digitorum and hallicus brevis.
The intensity level will be set to the amperage immediately under the threshold for motor contraction.
If there is no contraction seen, patients will be excluded.
In addition, if the patient perceives pain, the intensity will be lowered until comfortable.
Stimulation frequency of 20 Hz and pulse width of 200ms in continuous mode will be used.
|
Active Comparator: Fixed-dose TTNS protocol
Fixed-dose protocol: Toe flexion will be attempted, as in the TTNS protocol. Then the stimulation will be reduced to 1 mA for 30 minutes. Both variable-dose TTNS and fixed-dose TTNS protocol participants will be instructed to use the device for 30 minutes, 5 days per week. |
Toe flexion will be attempted, as in the TTNS protocol.
Then the stimulation will be reduced to 1 mA for 30 minutes.
This will continue at 5x weekly until 1-year post-injury.
|
Active Comparator: Variable-dose TTNS Protocol 2 x week
At the 4 month CMG, subjects initially randomized into the variable dose protocol of 2 x weekly will start doing so for the remainder of the study.
|
At the 4 month CMG, subjects initially randomized into the variable dose protocol of 2 x weekly will start doing so for the remainder of the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maintained bladder capacity as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in ml
Time Frame: Baseline
|
we expect bladder capacity to be maintained in those with effective TTNS
|
Baseline
|
Maintained bladder capacity as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in ml
Time Frame: 4 months post SCI
|
we expect bladder capacity to be maintained in those with effective TTNS
|
4 months post SCI
|
Prolonged sensation with bladder filling as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in ml
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Evidence of TTNS mechanism expected in those with effective TTNS
|
Baseline
|
Prolonged sensation with bladder filling as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in ml
Time Frame: 4 months post SCI
|
Evidence of TTNS mechanism expected in those with effective TTNS
|
4 months post SCI
|
Prolonged sensation with bladder filling as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in ml
Time Frame: 1 year post SCI
|
Evidence of TTNS mechanism expected in those with effective TTNS
|
1 year post SCI
|
Change in bladder pathology from baseline presence of detrusor overactivity and DSD as assessed by the urodynamics study at 4 months.
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
|
Reduced bladder pathology (presence of detrusor overactivity and DSD) in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on change in urodynamic studies at baseline and 4-months
|
Baseline, 4 months
|
Change in bladder pathology from 4 month presence of detrusor overactivity and DSD as assessed by the urodynamics study at 1 year post SCI.
Time Frame: 4 months and 1 year post SCI
|
Reduced bladder pathology (presence of detrusor overactivity and DSD) in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on the change in urodynamic studies at 4 months and 1-year
|
4 months and 1 year post SCI
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evidence of improved quality of life in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) survey
Time Frame: At discharge which could be up to 4 week from admission, 4-months post injury and at 1 year post injury.
|
Comparing I-QOL upon discharge from rehabilitation, 4-months post-injury and 1-year post-injury using incontinence QOL (I-QOL) survey, between and within both arms of the study
|
At discharge which could be up to 4 week from admission, 4-months post injury and at 1 year post injury.
|
Evidence of improved quality of life in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)
Time Frame: Prior to discharge which could be up to 4 weeks from admission, monthly until 1 year post injury.
|
Changes in Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Scores.
The total score can range from 0 (no symptoms at all) to 74 (maximum symptoms) where a lower score indicates a better outcome.
|
Prior to discharge which could be up to 4 weeks from admission, monthly until 1 year post injury.
|
Evidence of improved quality of life in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on frequency of catheterization and voiding volumes
Time Frame: 2 days at the end of each month for 1 year.
|
Maintaining frequency of catheterization (count per day) and volumes per void (ml per collection)
|
2 days at the end of each month for 1 year.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Argyrios Stampas, MD, UTHealth and TIRR Mermorial Hermann
- Principal Investigator: Suzanne Groah, MD, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- de Seze M, Raibaut P, Gallien P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Bonniaud V, Game X, Amarenco G. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for treatment of the overactive bladder syndrome in multiple sclerosis: results of a multicenter prospective study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):306-11. doi: 10.1002/nau.20958. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
- Street JT, Noonan VK, Cheung A, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF. Incidence of acute care adverse events and long-term health-related quality of life in patients with TSCI. Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):923-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.051. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
- Stohrer M, Blok B, Castro-Diaz D, Chartier-Kastler E, Del Popolo G, Kramer G, Pannek J, Radziszewski P, Wyndaele JJ. EAU guidelines on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2009 Jul;56(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
- Fougere RJ, Currie KD, Nigro MK, Stothers L, Rapoport D, Krassioukov AV. Reduction in Bladder-Related Autonomic Dysreflexia after OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Sep 15;33(18):1651-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4278. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
- Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
- Manriquez V, Guzman R, Naser M, Aguilera A, Narvaez S, Castro A, Swift S, Digesu GA. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation versus extended release oxybutynin in overactive bladder patients. A prospective randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jan;196:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
- Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1355-70. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1355.
- Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Association of level of injury and bladder behavior in patients with post-traumatic spinal cord injury. Urology. 2000 Apr;55(4):490-4. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00553-1.
- Chaabane W, Guillotreau J, Castel-Lacanal E, Abu-Anz S, De Boissezon X, Malavaud B, Marque P, Sarramon JP, Rischmann P, Game X. Sacral neuromodulation for treating neurogenic bladder dysfunction: clinical and urodynamic study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Apr;30(4):547-50. doi: 10.1002/nau.21009.
- Chen G, Liao L, Li Y. The possible role of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation using adhesive skin surface electrodes in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity secondary to spinal cord injury. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Mar;47(3):451-5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0911-6. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
- del Popolo G, Mencarini M, Nelli F, Lazzeri M. Controversy over the pharmacological treatments of storage symptoms in spinal cord injury patients: a literature overview. Spinal Cord. 2012 Jan;50(1):8-13. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.110. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
- Canbaz Kabay S, Kabay S, Mestan E, Cetiner M, Ayas S, Sevim M, Ozden H, Karaman HO. Long term sustained therapeutic effects of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation treatment of neurogenic overactive bladder in multiple sclerosis patients: 12-months results. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):104-110. doi: 10.1002/nau.22868. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
- Sirls ER, Killinger KA, Boura JA, Peters KM. Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Office Setting: Real-world Experience of Over 100 Patients. Urology. 2018 Mar;113:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.026. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
- Sievert KD, Amend B, Gakis G, Toomey P, Badke A, Kaps HP, Stenzl A. Early sacral neuromodulation prevents urinary incontinence after complete spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol. 2010 Jan;67(1):74-84. doi: 10.1002/ana.21814.
- McDonald JW 3rd, Sadowsky CL, Stampas A. The changing field of rehabilitation: optimizing spontaneous regeneration and functional recovery. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:317-36. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00020-6.
- Stampas A, Tansey KE. Spinal cord injury medicine and rehabilitation. Semin Neurol. 2014 Nov;34(5):524-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396006. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- Stampas A, York HS, O'Dell MW. Is the Routine Use of a Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycle for Lower Limb Movement Standard of Care for Acute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation? PM R. 2017 May;9(5):521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.03.005. No abstract available.
- Stampas A, Korupolu R, Zhu L, Smith CP, Gustafson K. Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bladder: A Randomized Control Pilot Trial. Neuromodulation. 2019 Aug;22(6):716-722. doi: 10.1111/ner.12855. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Sanford MT, Suskind AM. Neuromodulation in neurogenic bladder. Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Feb;5(1):117-26. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.12.01.
- Stampas A, Gustafson K, Korupolu R, Smith C, Zhu L, Li S. Bladder Neuromodulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury via Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation: Cystometrogram and Autonomic Nervous System Evidence From a Randomized Control Pilot Trial. Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 19;13:119. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00119. eCollection 2019.
- Finazzi Agro E, Campagna A, Sciobica F, Petta F, Germani S, Zuccala A, Miano R. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation: is the once-a-week protocol the best option? Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2005 Jun;57(2):119-23. English, Italian.
- Gaziev G, Topazio L, Iacovelli V, Asimakopoulos A, Di Santo A, De Nunzio C, Finazzi-Agro E. Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) efficacy in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunctions: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2013 Nov 25;13:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-61.
- Dubeau CE. The aging lower urinary tract. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 2):S11-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00311-3.
- Welk B, Lenherr S, Elliott S, Stoffel J, Presson AP, Zhang C, Myers JB. The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS): a secondary assessment of its validity, reliability among people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2018 Mar;56(3):259-264. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0028-0. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
- Schurch B, Denys P, Kozma CM, Reese PR, Slaton T, Barron R. Reliability and validity of the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire in patients with neurogenic urinary incontinence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.009.
- Bothig R, Fiebag K, Thietje R, Faschingbauer M, Hirschfeld S. Morbidity of urinary tract infection after urodynamic examination of hospitalized SCI patients: the impact of bladder management. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jan;51(1):70-3. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.107. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
- Pannek J, Nehiba M. Morbidity of urodynamic testing in patients with spinal cord injury: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary? Spinal Cord. 2007 Dec;45(12):771-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102114. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
- Montgomerie JZ. Infections in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Dec;25(6):1285-90; quiz 1291-2. doi: 10.1086/516144. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Urinary Bladder Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-19-0756
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityInstitute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy of the Polish Academy of... and other collaboratorsUnknownComplete Spinal Cord InjuriesPoland
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMetastatic Epidural Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Variable-dose TTNS Protocol 5 x week
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedNeurogenic Bowel | Chronic Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteCompleted
-
Auro Vaccines LLCUnited States Department of Defense; AccelovanceCompletedEbola Virus DiseaseUnited States
-
Crucell Holland BVThe PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI); Seattle Children's Research Institute...Completed
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedFocus of the Study: Normal VolunteersUnited States
-
University of OxfordNational Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom; The PATH Malaria Vaccine...CompletedPlasmodium Falciparum MalariaUnited Kingdom
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAstellas Pharma US, Inc.CompletedEGFR-Mutant Lung CancerUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterNational Center for Research Resources (NCRR)CompletedPulmonary Arterial HypertensionUnited States
-
Kadmon Corporation, LLCQuotient SciencesCompletedFibrosis | Autoimmune DiseasesUnited Kingdom
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedBacterial Keratitis | Fungal Keratitis | Mixed Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis | Microbial KeratitisEgypt