Lung Protective Ventilation During Pulmonary Lobectomy in Children

March 5, 2018 updated by: Jin-Tae Kim, Seoul National University Hospital

The Influence of Lung Protective Ventilation During Pulmonary Lobectomy on Clinical Outcome in Pediatric Patients

The investigator will evaluate the influence of lung protective ventilation on postoperative clinical outcome in pediatric patients. The hypothesis is that application of low tidal volume, intermittent alveolar recruitment and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) would be more beneficial than conventional ventilation in children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children who are scheduled for lung lobectomy under general anesthesia
  • ASA physical status I, II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of airway or pulmonary interstitial disease
  • Active URI
  • Systemic inflammatory response disease
  • cardiac disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Conventional ventilation group
Mechanical ventilation is maintained with tidal volume (TV) of 10 ml/kg without PEEP during two-lung ventilation and TV of 8 ml/kg without PEEP during one-lung ventilation. Alveolar recruitment is performed 3 times; after intubation, before one-lung ventilation and after lung resection.
Procedure: Conventional ventilation
TV 8 ml/kg during one lung ventilation and 10 ml/kg during two-lung ventilation without PEEP
Active Comparator: Lung protective ventilation group
Mechanical ventilation is maintained with tidal volume (TV) of 6 ml/kg with PEEP 6 cmH2O during two-lung ventilation and TV of 4 ml/kg PEEP 6 cmH2O during one-lung ventilation. Alveolar recruitment is performed 3 times; after intubation, before one-lung ventilation and after lung resection.
Procedure: lung protective ventilation
TV 4 ml/kg during one lung ventilation and 6 ml/kg during two-lung ventilation with PEEP of 6 cmH2O

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients with pulmonary complication
Time Frame: up to postoperative 7 days
The number of patients with pulmonary complication including atelectasis, pulmonary infiltration, pulmonary edema, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism
up to postoperative 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients with desaturation
Time Frame: During surgery
The number of patients with desaturation (SpO2 < 90%)
During surgery
The number of patients with extrapulmonary complication
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean duration of ICU stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H1511-124-725

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Complication

Clinical Trials on Conventional ventilation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Myanmar

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe