Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair: Are Muscle Relaxants Necessary? Endotracheal Intubation vs Laryngeal Mask Airway

May 28, 2016 updated by: Asst. Prof. Serkan Tulgar, M.D., Maltepe University

Safety Control Study in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair: Are Muscle Relaxants Necessary? Endotracheal Intubation vs Laryngeal Mask Airway

In prospective, safety-control study; children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using PIRS (Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing) method will be randomly assigned into four groups. Gr 1: Endotracheal intubation and muscle relaxant, Gr 2: Endotracheal Intubation without muscle relaxant, Gr 3: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway without muscle relaxant, Gr 4: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with subparalytic does muscle relaxant. Apart from standard monitorization, all patients' intragastric pressures will also be monitored. Patients' age at presentation, gender, time of surgery, time of anesthesia, intragastric pressure, intraabdominal pressure, intraoperative findings and complications will be noted and compared between groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this prospective, safety-control study; children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using PIRS (Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing) method will be randomly assigned into four groups.

Gr 1: Endotracheal intubation and muscle relaxant, Gr 2: Endotracheal Intubation without muscle relaxant, Gr 3: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway without muscle relaxant, Gr 4: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with subparalytic does muscle relaxant.

Apart from standard monitorization, all patients' intragastric pressures will also be monitored. Patients' age at presentation, gender, time of surgery, time of anesthesia, intragastric pressure, intraabdominal pressure, intraoperative findings and complications will be noted and compared between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Maltepe University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 0-18 years
  • Diagnosed with inguinal hernia or communicating hydrocele
  • Due to undergo laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous abdominal surgery
  • Comorbidities that will effect surgical time, time under anesthesia, intragastric pressure and abdominal pressure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ETT & Muscle Relaxant
Children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using PIRS method with Endotracheal Intubation and Muscle Relaxant
Active Comparator: ETT & No Muscle Relaxant
Children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using PIRS method with Endotracheal Intubation and No Muscle Relaxant
Active Comparator: Proseal LMA & No Muscle Relaxant
Children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using PIRS method with Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and NO Muscle Relaxant
Active Comparator: Proseal LMA & Subparalytic Muscle Relaxant
Children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using PIRS method with Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and subparalytic dose Muscle Relaxant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery Time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Time from skin prep to last suture
Intraoperative
Time Under Anesthesia
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Time from induction to moderate Alderete score of 9 or above
Intraoperative
Intragastric Pressure
Time Frame: Intraoperative continuous monitoring
Intraoperative continuous monitoring
Intraabdominal Pressure
Time Frame: Intraoperative continuous monitoring
Intraoperative continuous monitoring

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Serkan Tulgar, M.D., Maltepe University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Intubation

Clinical Trials on Rocuronium

3
Subscribe