Improving Contraceptive Counseling in the United States (ICC)

October 31, 2022 updated by: New York University
This project develops a contraceptive counseling protocol (CCP) grounded in scientific evidence and evaluates the CCP for promoting behaviors conducive to preventing unintended pregnancy among women. The project develops and refines the CCP using focus groups and in-depth interviews with (a) key administrators in the national office of Planned Parenthood (b) key administrators in participating Title X clinics, (c) contraceptive counselors, and (d) clients of the health centers. The CCP uses scientifically grounded principles for guiding effective decision making and provider-client communication. Ten Title X clinics are randomly assigned to one of two conditions (5 clinics per condition): (1) treatment as usual (TAU) or (2) implementation of the CCP. Approximately 150 women are selected for study participation in each clinic, yielding about 1,400 participants (half control and half CCP). Immediately following their counseling session, women complete a computer-administered interview that serves as a fidelity check and permits evaluation of the effects of the CCP on variables associated with counseling satisfaction. All women are re-interviewed by phone 6 months later and 12 months later. The effect of the CCP on method-choice effectiveness, method switching, gaps in protection, and use accuracy are evaluated.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1418

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10001
        • New York University, Silver School of Social Work

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be seeking contraception from clinic on day of recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not seeking contraception from clinic on day of recruitment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention arm receives contraceptive counseling from counselors who underwent training on the use of evidence informed birth control counseling.
Counselors underwent training on the use of 10 best practices for contraceptive counseling.
Other Names:
  • Improving contraceptive counseling in the United States
No Intervention: No intervention
The no intervention arm receives contraceptive counseling from counselors who underwent no additional training beyond what they normally receive.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction with counselors as assessed by 5 point Likert rating scales using questionnaire designed for this study at immediate posttest.
Time Frame: immediately after counseling session
immediately after counseling session
Patient satisfaction with counseling session as assessed by 5 point Likert rating scales using a questionnaire designed for this study at immediate posttest.
Time Frame: immediately after counseling session
immediately after counseling session
Patient satisfaction with clinic experience overall as assessed by 5 point Likert rating scales using a questionnaire designed for this study at immediate posttest.
Time Frame: immediately after counseling session
immediately after counseling session
Patient satisfaction with clinic experience overall as assessed by 5 point Likert rating scales using a questionnaire designed for this study at 6 months.
Time Frame: 6 months from initial clinic visit
6 months from initial clinic visit
Patient satisfaction with clinic experience overall as assessed by 5 point Likert rating scales using a questionnaire designed for this study at 12 months.
Time Frame: one year from initial clinic visit
one year from initial clinic visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Type of contraceptive method currently using (including none and dual use) as assessed by a questionnaire designed for this study (e.g., what method of birth control are you currently using).
Time Frame: six months to one year from initial clinic visit
six months to one year from initial clinic visit

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Method switching for pill users as assessed by a questionnaire designed for this study asking current method used at posttest to determine if it is no longer the pill using questions designed for this study
Time Frame: six months to one year from initial clinic visit
six months to one year from initial clinic visit
Gaps in pregnancy protection (number of weeks not using any birth control during contraceptive method switches as assessed by a questionnaire designed for this study using retrospective recall
Time Frame: six months to one year from initial clinic visit
six months to one year from initial clinic visit
Counselor behavior (topics covered during counseling) as assessed by a questionnaire designed for this study asking if counselor did or did not address key topics about method use
Time Frame: six months to one year from initial clinic visit
six months to one year from initial clinic visit
Pill users retrospective report of the number of missed pills using a questionnaire designed for this study
Time Frame: six months to one year from initial clinic visit
six months to one year from initial clinic visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James J Jaccard, PhD, New York University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FPRPA006057
  • 12-9103 (Other Identifier: NYU Committee on Activities Involving Human Subjects)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual

Clinical Trials on Evidence informed birth control counseling

3
Subscribe