Designing Multimedia Patient Education for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (PEMAIS)

December 4, 2024 updated by: Garett Van Oirschot, University College Dublin

Designing Multimedia Patient Education Materials for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of Patient Education Videos

The goal of this triple-masked three-armed feasibility randomised controlled trial is to compare patient education materials for participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The main question it aims to answer are:

  • Are educational videos superior to usual care?
  • Are educational videos formatted in line with literature advice on multimedia design superior to videos formatted as traditionally found on scoliosis advisory websites Participants in the video groups will be asked to do view six educational videos and respond to a quiz. Researchers will compare the informed video group and traditional video group to usual care to see if there are differences in engagement, quality of life, physical activity and health-related anxiety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multimedia patient education materials are increasingly used in healthcare. This triple-masked three-armed feasibility randomised controlled trial will examine participants aged 10-18 with radiographically confirmed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and their response to usual care or to receive multimedia educational videos with or without evidence-informed design principles. Primary outcomes will be patient knowledge measured by online quiz and engagement measured by YouTube analytics. Participants will be masked in the two video intervention arms, as will the therapist sending the educational videos. The results will outline the number of participants recruited and randomised, the number analysed post-intervention and at week eight, and the outcomes for baseline, post-intervention and week 8, which will include the effect size and level of precision. Adverse events will also be reported.

This feasibility randomised controlled trial will offer insight into the effectiveness of implementing advice from the literature in designing multimedia patient education materials for a population with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dublin 4
      • Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland, D04 V1W8
        • University College Dublin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 10-18 years
  • parent/guardian consent for those under 18 years of age
  • adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) as confirmed by Cobb angle ≥10deg on plain film radiographs
  • able to watch and listen to online educational materials as well as read and complete online surveys

Exclusion Criteria:

- scoliosis due to non-AIS conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual care
Usual care from healthcare providers
Experimental: Traditional video format
Multimedia videos formatted as traditionally found online
6 x 3 minute videos designed in the same format as traditionally found on the internet
Experimental: Evidence-informed video format
Multimedia videos formatted as per evidence advice
6 x 3 minute videos designed in the format recommended by advice in the literature

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number recruited, rejected, randomised, dropped off, completed
Time Frame: Week 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Number of participants enrolled at each stage of recruitment, rejection, randomisation, during study, and upon completion
Week 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Dropout reasons
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Participant reasons for dropping out (if provided)
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Outcomes completed
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Percentage of outcomes completed
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Satisfaction with study procedures
Time Frame: Week 8
Patient response to tailored question about satisfaction with intervention & study process. Question will read "How satisfied were you with the study process?" and participants will score on a 5-point scale with 1 being Very Unsatisfied and 5 being Very Satisfied
Week 8
Number and type of adverse events
Time Frame: Week 2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Adverse events
Week 2,3,4,5,6,7,8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scoliosis Research Society 22-revised
Time Frame: Week 0, 8
Scoliosis Research Society 22-item revised questionnaire of health-related quality of life. The SRS-22r measures quality of life across 5 domains - Function (5 questions), Pain (5 questions) Self-Image (5 questions), Mental Health (5 questions), Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction (2 questions). The maximum score in each domain is 5 and minimum score is 1, with higher scores representing greater patient quality of life.
Week 0, 8
YouTube Average Watch Duration
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6
Duration of video view
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6
Knowledge Translation
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6
5-item multiple choice quiz immediately after video watching
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6
Knowledge Retention
Time Frame: Week 8
40-item multiple choice quiz after 8 weeks
Week 8
YouTube Watch Percentage
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Watch time / Total time
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
YouTube Behavioural Engagement
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Percent of time on specific segments
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
YouTube Time to Complete
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Time relative to completion
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
YouTube Visits
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Number of views for the video
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
YouTube Affective Engagement
Time Frame: Week 1,2,3,4,5,6
Selecting thumbs up (like) or down (dislike) using like buttons
Week 1,2,3,4,5,6
European Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Version
Time Frame: Week 0, 8
The EQ-5D-Y descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, looking after myself, doing usual activities, having pain or discomfort and feeling worried, sad or unhappy. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems and a lot of problems. A higher score indicates higher quality of health.
Week 0, 8
Physical Activity Questionnaire - older Children
Time Frame: Week 0, 8
Physical Activity Questionnaire for older Children is a a seven-day recall self-administered questionnaire to evaluate moderately to vigorous physical activity in child. A higher score indicates a higher level of physical activity.
Week 0, 8
State Trait Anxiety Index (Children)
Time Frame: Week 0, 8
State Trait Anxiety Index for Children is a psychological inventory consisting of 40 self-report items on a 4-point Likert scale. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety and trait anxiety. Higher scores are positively correlated with higher levels of anxiety.
Week 0, 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Cailbhe Doherty, PhD, BSc, University College Dublin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All anonymised data will be available for viewing on OSF

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available from 2025 when data is expected to be compiled and written up and submitted for publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All those with the Open Science Framework link will be able to access the anonymised patient data on the project's Open Science Framework page

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Engagement

Clinical Trials on Traditional video format

Subscribe