Effectiveness of Using the Progressive Goal Attainment Program in Anxiety and Mood Disorders (PGAP)

March 16, 2020 updated by: Tanja Colonerus, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Using the Progressive Goal Attainment Program in Anxiety and Mood Disorders

The purpose of the present study is to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of the Progressive Goal Attainment Program (PGAP) with individuals with anxiety and mood disorders. PGAP has been suggested as an effective therapy to reduce psychosocial barriers and help individuals return to life roles including readiness to return to work. PGAP has been shown to be effective with some chronic health conditions however has not been specifically studied in mental health populations. The study consists of 10 one hour weekly therapy sessions that focus on reducing psychosocial risk factors that result in disability through the use of goal setting, activity planning and activation, monitoring and challenging thoughts about return to work, and problem solving. Participants will also be asked to complete short self-report questionnaires as well as a semi-structured interview about the participants anxiety, mood, impact of disability, and current functioning at the beginning of session one and within two weeks after session 10. Two short questionnaires will also be completed at each session measuring the degree to which the participants daily life impacts and is affected by anxiety or mood symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of the present study is to determine the effectiveness of the Progressive Goal Attainment Program (PGAP) with individuals with anxiety and mood disorders. PGAP has been suggested as an effective therapy to reduce psychosocial barriers and help individuals return to life roles including readiness to return to work. PGAP has been shown to be effective with some chronic health conditions however has not been specifically studied in mental health populations.

The study consists of 10 one hour weekly therapy sessions with a clinician and follow the PGAP manual. The therapy sessions focus on reducing psychosocial risk factors that result in disability through the use of goal setting, activity planning, activation and re-engagement in activities, monitoring and challenging thoughts about return to work, and problem solving. Participants are also encouraged to participate in homework which involves daily activity planning, participating in planned activities, and tracking the activities completed. Participants will also be asked to complete short self-report questionnaires as well as a semi-structured interview about the participants anxiety, mood, impact of disability, and current functioning at the beginning of session one and within two weeks after session 10. Two short questionnaires will also be completed at each session measuring the degree to which the participants daily life impacts and is affected by anxiety or mood symptoms.

Our first hypothesis is that participants who receive PGAP will report significant reductions in functional disability as measured by self-report as well as by interview, decreases in self-reported work avoidance, increases in work readiness, and decreases in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Our second hypothesis is that mean reductions in the above-noted outcome variables will be similar in magnitude to those reported in published studies that have examined PGAP in chronic medically ill populations. Retention rates and satisfaction of the therapy will also be assessed to determine feasibility of implementing the program on a larger scale.

To examine the effectiveness of PGAP with participants with an anxiety or a mood disorder, the investigators will conduct a series of dependent sample t-tests on the outcome variables pre and post intervention. The investigators will also compare mean changes on the outcome variables to those in the published literature. The investigators will calculate retention rates with the aim of retaining more than 75% of participants, which is comparable to retention and drop out rates for psychotherapy trials with participants completing at least 8 out of 10 sessions or having returned to employment. Feasibility will also be measured by looking at satisfaction ratings. A minimal standard will be an average satisfaction rating across participants of midpoint (neutral) or above in terms of the therapy received.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3K7
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants will be

  1. between the ages of 18 and 65 years
  2. have a principle diagnosis of an anxiety or mood disorder
  3. have had changes in their work functioning, either currently not working due to their disability or on modified/reduced work.
  4. be registered outpatients of the Anxiety Treatment and Research Clinic or Outpatient Mood Disorders Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton,
  5. are interested in return to work or have work related goals.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. current significant substance use
  2. acute mental health (e.g. suicidality, psychosis, mania) that would interfere with the program completion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Progressive Goal Attainment Program
10 one hour weekly therapy sessions focused on behavioural interventions
Behavioural intervention that consists of 10 one hour weekly therapy sessions that focus on goal setting, challenging thoughts about return to work, problem solving, behavioural activation, and resuming occupational roles.
Other Names:
  • PGAP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of PGAP on disability (participant perception)
Time Frame: one year
Level of disability will be measured using a modified version of the Pain Disability Index ( a 7 item self-report measure).
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of PGAP on symptom change
Time Frame: one year
Mood and anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (a 21 item self-report measure).
one year
Impact of PGAP on level of interference from mood and anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: one year
Level of interference from mood and anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (13 item self-report measure).
one year
Impact of PGAP on fear avoidance beliefs
Time Frame: one year
Fear avoidance beliefs will be measured using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (11 item self-report measure).
one year
PGAP retention rates
Time Frame: one year
Retention rates will be measured by tracking drop out rates.
one year
Satisfaction with the PGAP
Time Frame: one year
Satisfaction with the therapy will be assessed by using The Satisfaction with Therapy and Therapist Scale-Revised (13 item self-report measure).
one year
Impact of PGAP on disability (clinician report)
Time Frame: one year
Level of disability will be measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (semi-structured interview).
one year
Impact of PGAP on role functioning
Time Frame: one year
Role functioning will be measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (semi-structured interview).
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tanja Colonerus, MADS, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1784 (Bern University Hospital)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Progressive Goal Attainment Program

3
Subscribe