To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine Prior to Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer

July 25, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Combination Dose Regimens: Capecitabine + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide (CEX) Versus 5-FU + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide (FEC 100) as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Females Presenting With Operable Breast Cancer

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with oral capecitabine or intravenous (IV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, prior to surgery in participants with breast cancer. The participants will receive 4 cycles of neoadjuvant Capecitabine + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide (CEX) or 5-FU + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide (FEC 100) chemotherapy during first treatment period (Period 1, Days 1-85). After 4-6 weeks of the fourth cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Day 120 +/- 7 days), breast surgery with regional lymph node dissection will be performed, followed within a maximum of 6 weeks by the second treatment period (Period 2, Days 1 to 85) when participants in both study arms will receive 4 cycles of adjuvant docetaxel 100 milligrams per meter square (mg/m^2) by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Upon completion of the second treatment period, participants will enter the post-treatment follow-up period which will last for 5 years from the initial date of participant randomization. During this period participants will be evaluated once a year on the anniversary date of randomization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

182

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bayonne, France, 64100
      • Beziers, France, 34500
      • Bourg En Bresse, France, 01012
      • Colmar, France, 68024
      • Dijon, France, 21079
      • Hyeres, France, 83400
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
      • Le Mans, France, 72037
      • Limoges, France, 87042
      • Lyon, France, 69437
      • Marseille, France, 13385
      • Montbeliard, France, 25209
      • Montfermeil, France, 93370
      • Nice, France, 06189
      • Nimes, France, 30029
      • Paris, France, 75181
      • Pierre Benite, France, 69310
      • Saint Herblain, France, 44805
      • Strasbourg, France, 67010
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
      • Vannes, France, 56001

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females with a unilateral, non-inflammatory, non-multicentric, non-metastatic breast adenocarcinoma, not considered candidates for conservative management, and whose diagnosis had been histologically confirmed as T2-3, N0-1, M0 according to the tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) classification
  • Clinically or radiologically measurable lesion (in 2 dimensions)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance Status less than equal to (<=) 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females presenting with brain metastases or a neurological or psychiatric disorder which could interfere with proper treatment compliance
  • Previous radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy for breast cancer
  • Previous history of a malignancy in last 5 years other than cutaneous basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
  • Serious concomitant infection
  • Pregnant or lactating females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 5-Fluorouracil + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide
Neoadjuvant treatment (Period 1): Participants will receive 4 cycles (cycle length = 21 days) of 5-FU + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. Surgery will be performed 5 (+/- 1) weeks after the last cycle. Adjuvant treatment (Period 2): Participants will receive 4 cycles (cycle length = 21 days) of docetaxel.
5-FU will be administered at 500 mg/m^2 by short IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle during neoadjuvant treatment period for 4 cycles.
Cyclophosphamide will be administered at 500 mg/m^2 by short IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant treatment period.
Docetaxel will be administered at 100 mg/m^2 by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during adjuvant treatment period.
Epirubicin will be administered at 100 mg/m^2 by short IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant treatment period.
Experimental: Capecitabine + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide
Neoadjuvant treatment (Period 1): Participants will receive 4 cycles (cycle length = 21 days) of capecitabine + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. Surgery will be performed 5 (+/- 1) weeks after the last cycle. Adjuvant treatment (Period 2): Participants will receive 4 cycles (cycle length = 21 days) of docetaxel.
Cyclophosphamide will be administered at 500 mg/m^2 by short IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant treatment period.
Docetaxel will be administered at 100 mg/m^2 by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during adjuvant treatment period.
Epirubicin will be administered at 100 mg/m^2 by short IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant treatment period.
Capecitabine will be administered at 900 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant treatment period.
Other Names:
  • Xeloda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with pathological complete tumor response Assessed by Expert Blinded Independent Review according to the Sataloff classification\n
Time Frame: Day 120 +/- 7 days
Day 120 +/- 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with pathological complete tumor response Assessed by Investigator according to the Sataloff classification
Time Frame: Day 120 +/- 7 days
Day 120 +/- 7 days
Percentage of participants with breast conserving surgery
Time Frame: Day 120 +/- 7 days
Day 120 +/- 7 days
Percentage of participants with objective clinical response, assessed by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria
Time Frame: Week 15
Week 15
Percentage of participants with clinical response, assessed by WHO criteria
Time Frame: Week 15
Week 15
Percentage of participants with disease progression, assessed by WHO criteria
Time Frame: Baseline up to 29 +/- 1 weeks
Baseline up to 29 +/- 1 weeks
Percentage of participants with abnormalities in bilateral mammography
Time Frame: Day 85
Day 85
Percentage of participants who died
Time Frame: Baseline up to 29 +/- 1 weeks
Baseline up to 29 +/- 1 weeks
Percentage of participants with abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: Days 1-85
Days 1-85
Percentage of participants with abnormal liver ultrasound
Time Frame: Days 1-85
Days 1-85
Percentage of participants with abnormal Chest X-Ray
Time Frame: Days 1-85
Days 1-85
Overall survival
Time Frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Baseline up to 5 years
Disease free survival, according to WHO criteria
Time Frame: Baseline up to 5 years
Baseline up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on 5-Fluorouracil

Subscribe