Effect of Water Exchange Method on Adenoma Miss Rates in Patients Undergoing Selective Polypectomy

August 25, 2016 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Effect of Water Exchange Method on Adenoma Miss Rates in Patients Undergoing Selective Polypectomy: a Single-centered, Randomized Controlled Study

Patients with colorectal adenomas are suggested to receive polypectomy. A substantial number of adenomas may be missed in patients with polyps found by previous colonoscopy. And water exchange (WE) method may increase the detection of missed adenoma compared with traditional air insufflation (AI) colonoscopy. The investigators aim to investigate whether water exchange colonoscopy method, compared with air insufflation method, can improve the detection of missed adenomas in patients undergoing selective polypectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For WE method, the air pump was turned off for the full duration of insertion to avoid inadvertent air insufflations and colon elongation. Residual air in the lumen was suctioned to minimize angulations at flexures. Water at 37°C was infused with a pump (Olympus) through the biopsy channel to confirm correct tip orientation for scope advancement. The infused water was removed predominantly by suction when the colonoscope was smoothly advanced during the insertion phase, and turbid luminal water due to residual feces was exchanged by clean water until the lumen was clearly visualized. Occasionally, if it was difficult to determine whether the colonoscope tip was in the cecum, air was allowed to be insufflated for observation. If the position of the scope tip was confirmed to be not in the cecum, insufflated air would be removed by suction and the WE method would be continuously used until successful intubation.

For the AI method, water was not used, and air was insufflated during insertion.

Air was insufflated to distend the lumen for inspection and biopsy or polypectomy during withdrawal for both methods. Polyps will be removed by forceps biopsy (polyps size <3mm), cold snare technique (3-6mm) or endoscopic mucosal resection (size≥6mm).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Recruiting
        • Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gui Ren, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 patients undergoing selective polypectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polyps found more than 6 months
  • Patients with polyposis syndrome or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
  • Patients with history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients with planning to undergo Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection(ESD)
  • Patients not undergoing standard bowel preparation
  • Patients with solid feces in the last stool after bowel preparation
  • Patients considered to be high risk for bleeding during Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), e.g. using antiplatelet drugs (clopidogrel) within 5 days before the current colonoscopy
  • Hemodynamically unstable
  • Pregnant women
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Water exchange (WE) method
Water exchange (WE) method was used for insertion to the cecum.
Water exchange (WE) method was used for insertion to the cecum. And air was insufflated to distend the lumen for inspection and biopsy or polypectomy during withdrawal procedure.
Active Comparator: Air insufflation (AI) method
Air insufflation (AI) method was used for insertion to the cecum.
Air insufflation (AI) method was used for insertion to the cecum. And air was insufflated to distend the lumen for inspection and biopsy or polypectomy during withdrawal procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adenoma miss rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Adenoma miss rate was calculated as the number of patients with one and more additional adenomas during polypectomy procedure divided by the total number of patients in each group.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adenoma-level miss rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Adenoma-level miss rate was calculated as the number of additional adenomas detected in polypectomy procedure divided by the total number of adenomas in each group.
12 months
Advanced adenoma miss rate/Miss advanced adenoma per colonoscopy
Time Frame: 12 months
Advanced adenoma: any with 3 or more adenomas of any size, 1 or more large adenomas 1 cm, or 1 or more adenomas with villous architecture or highgrade dysplasia.
12 months
Adenoma per positive patient (APP)
Time Frame: 12 months
The mean number of adenoma per positive patient
12 months
Quality of Bowel Preparation
Time Frame: 12 months
The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS): cleanliness of each part of the colon: 0=unprepared colon segment with mucosa not seen because of solid stool that cannot be cleared; 1=portion of mucosa of the colon segment seen, but other areas of the colon segment not well seen because of staining, residual stool, and/or opaque liquid; 2=minor amount of residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid, but mucosa of colon segment seen well; 3=entire mucosa of colon segment seen well with no residual staining, small fragments of stool, or opaque liquid.
12 months
Complication rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Bleeding, perforation and others
12 months
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale compared with previous colonoscopy
Time Frame: 12 months
0 = no pain, to 10 = most severe pain
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenoma

Clinical Trials on Water exchange (WE) method

3
Subscribe