- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03160859
Prospective RCT Of Water Exchange (WE) vs. WE Plus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy
Prospective RCT of Water Exchange (WE) vs. WE Plus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This will be a multi-VA site, unblinded investigators, prospective randomized control trial (RCT). Randomization (WE, WE + cap) will be based on computer generated random numbers placed inside opaque sealed envelopes. The envelope (in pre-arranged order set up by statistics consultant) will be opened to reveal the code when the colonoscopist is ready to insert the endoscope to begin the examination. This will be a comparison of two arms (WE, WE + cap) to see which one is less painful.
Patients who are willing to participate will sign an informed consent before starting the colonoscopy procedure. Separate parallel randomization will be set up at each site, stratified type of colonoscopy (screening, surveillance, diagnostic). All subjects will have scheduled unsedated colonoscopy as a result of lack of escort or personal preference for no sedation. Randomization will be set up by statistics consultant.
Control Method: One arm of the study will include unsedated colonoscopy with water exchange (WE) as the control method. Residual air in the colon will be removed and water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual fecal debris, predominantly during insertion.
Study method: The other arm will include unsedated colonoscopy with water exchange (WE) and the addition of a cap, fitted to the colonoscope per manufacturer instruction.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95655
- VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA
-
Sepulveda, California, United States, 91343
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Informed/educated (about pros and cons of the unsedated option) Veterans undergoing:
- diagnostic
- surveillance (follow up of polyps)
- screening (first-time) colonoscopy at participating sites
- choosing scheduled unsedated colonoscopy for any reason (lack of escort, personal preference)
Exclusion Criteria:
- decline to be randomized
- unable to give consent or respond to questionnaires
- history of colon surgery
- active inflammatory bowel disease
- lower gastrointestinal bleeding (except for occult blood or FIT positive in the context of colon cancer screening)
- therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g., hemostasis, removal of large polyp)
- proctosigmoidoscopy
- bidirectional endoscopy
- inadequate consumption of bowel preparation
- known history of severe diverticulosis or diverticulitis
- history of abdominal surgery previously requiring sedation for colonoscopy
- current narcotic/anxiolytic medication use
- prior unsuccessful experience with unsedated colonoscopy
- emergent colonoscopy
- evidence of colonic obstruction based on pre-colonoscopy clinical evaluation
- current participation in other studies
medical condition that could increase the risk associated with colonoscopy
- active cardiac
- or pulmonary disease
- or other serious disease
medical condition that would preclude a benefit from colonoscopic screening
- cancer
- or any terminal illness
- prosthetic heart valve
- anticoagulant therapy
nonmedical problems
- psychiatric disorders
- excessive use of alcohol
need for special precautions in performing colonoscopy
- antibiotic prophylaxis
- request of on demand sedation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Control Method
One arm of the study will include unsedated colonoscopy with water exchange (WE) as the control method.
Residual air in the colon will be removed and water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen.
Infused water will be removed predominantly during insertion.
|
Unsedated colonoscopy with water exchange (WE) where the residual air in the colon will be removed and water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen.
Infused water is removed predominantly during insertion.
Other Names:
|
Other: Study Method
The other arm will include unsedated colonoscopy with water exchange (WE) and the addition of a simple commercially available accessory to the colonoscopy device: a cap (Disposable Distal Attachment, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan) fitted to the colonoscope per manufacturer instruction.
Residual air in the colon will be removed and water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen.
Infused water will be removed predominantly during insertion.
|
Unsedated colonoscopy with water exchange (WE + cap) and the addition of a cap fitted to the colonoscope.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Real Time Maximum Insertion Pain
Time Frame: Insertion pain was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Pain during insertion reported to the unblinded assisting nurse, visual analogue scale, VAS: 0=none, 10=most severe.
The highest pain score will be tabulated for analysis.
Timing of data collection will be at the discretion of the nurse to minimize bias by colonoscopist behavior.
|
Insertion pain was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of Patients With No Insertion Pain
Time Frame: Pain was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Proportion of patients who report no pain during insertion of the colonoscope.
|
Pain was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Insertion Time
Time Frame: Insertion time in minutes was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Time to cecum (clock display on monitor), faster insertion is a quality marker
|
Insertion time in minutes was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Right Colon Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
Time Frame: Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Right colon Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) is the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma in the part of the colon between the cecum and the hepatic flexure.
|
Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) was measured during the duration of the colonoscopy procedure, which lasted on average for about 1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Felix W. Leung, MD, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, Okamoto KE, Behbahani OM, Jamgotchian NJ, Aharonian HS, Guth PH, Mann SK, Leung JW. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
- Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1390-400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
- Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, Argiolas M, Fanari V, Porcedda ML, Erriu M, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):557-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 26. Erratum In: Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May;81(5):1303.
- Cadoni S, Gallittu P, Sanna S, Fanari V, Porcedda ML, Erriu M, Leung FW. A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2014 Mar;46(3):212-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353604. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Jonas DE, Russell LB, Sandler RS, Chou J, Pignone M. Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;102(11):2401-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01387.x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
- Wolff WI, Shinya H. Polypectomy via the fiberoptic colonoscope. Removal of neoplasms beyond reach of the sigmoidoscope. N Engl J Med. 1973 Feb 15;288(7):329-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197302152880701. No abstract available.
- Leung FW. The case of unsedated screening colonoscopy in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1354-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.234. Epub 2009 Feb 27. No abstract available.
- Leung FW, Aljebreen AM, Brocchi E, Chang EB, Liao WC, Mizukami T, Schapiro M, Triantafyllou K. Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar 16;2(3):81-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i3.81.
- Leung FW. Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy? J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):19-22. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14592.
- Cataldo PA. Colonoscopy without sedation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Mar;39(3):257-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02049463.
- Hoffman MS, Butler TW, Shaver T. Colonoscopy without sedation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):279-82. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199806000-00013.
- Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 May;49(5):554-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70381-0.
- Subramanian S, Liangpunsakul S, Rex DK. Preprocedure patient values regarding sedation for colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;39(6):516-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000165667.79530.44.
- Early DS, Saifuddin T, Johnson JC, King PD, Marshall JB. Patient attitudes toward undergoing colonoscopy without sedation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;94(7):1862-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01219.x.
- Leung FW. Patients' perspective - written testimonials from physician-patients and oral accounts presented by patients in person. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):45-46. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14605. No abstract available.
- Leung FW. Unsedated colonoscopy introduced to ensure access is acceptable to a subgroup of veterans. Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Oct;53(10):2719-22. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0192-8. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
- Felix W. Leung, Hartley Cohen, Stanley K. Dea, Dennis M. Jensen, Thomas O. Kovacs, Gordon V. Ohning, Joseph R. Pisegna, Alireza Sedarat, Alan Sheinbaum, Timothy C. Simmons, Rebecca Slomovic, Brennan M. Spiegel, Mitchell J. Spirt, James Sul and Rabindra R. Watson. Scheduled unsedated colonoscopy - a novel tool for managing no shows due to lack of escorts required for conscious sedation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2014-05-01, Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages AB178-AB179
- Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F, Terreni N, Minoli G. Routine versus "on demand" sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Aug;54(2):169-74. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113923.
- Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, Canete W, Leung FW. The established and time-tested water exchange method in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy significantly enhanced patient-centered outcomes without prolonging procedural times - A RCT. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2013;3(1):7-11.
- Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, Liggi M, Mura D, Smajstrla V, Erriu M, Leung FW. Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(11):1972-80.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.178. Epub 2015 May 5.
- Kim HG. Painless Colonoscopy: Available Techniques and Instruments. Clin Endosc. 2016 Sep;49(5):444-448. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.132. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
- Morgan J, Thomas K, Lee-Robichaud H, Nelson RL, Braungart S. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy to improve caecal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD008211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008211.pub3.
- Holme O, Bretthauer M, de Lange T, Seip B, Huppertz-Hauss G, Hoie O, Sandvei P, Ystrom CM, Hoff G. Risk stratification to predict pain during unsedated colonoscopy: results of a multicenter cohort study. Endoscopy. 2013 Sep;45(9):691-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344239. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
- Wang L, Jia H, Luo H, Kang X, Zhang L, Wang X, Yao S, Tao Q, Pan Y, Guo X. A novel intubation discomfort score to predict painful unsedated colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e24907. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024907.
- Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Oct;95(10):2784-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03186.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- GAST-015-16S
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Water Exchange Colonoscopy
-
Ningbo No. 1 HospitalCompletedWater Exchange ColonoscopyChina
-
Evergreen General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedColonic Adenoma | Water Exchange ColonoscopyTaiwan
-
Valduce HospitalCompletedUnsedated Colonoscopy | Warm Water | CO2 ColonoscopyItaly
-
Memorial University of NewfoundlandEnrolling by invitationWater Assisted ColonoscopyCanada
-
Gadjah Mada UniversityUnknownWater Immersion Method Colonoscopy in Unsedated PatientsIndonesia
-
University of California, DavisCompletedColon Adenomas | Colon Polyps | Colon Cancer Screening | Water Exchange ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Teleon Surgical B.V.MaganaMed GmbHEnrolling by invitationCataract | Aphakia | Clear Lens Exchange | Refractive Lens ExchangeNetherlands
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedEvaluation of Complication Rates Using Filter vs. Centrifuge and Heparin vs. Citrate AnticoagulationTherapeutic Plasma Exchange | Anticoagulant TherapyUnited States
-
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université...CompletedTherapeutic Plasma ExchangeBelgium
-
Obstetrix Medical GroupCompleted
Clinical Trials on Control
-
Claudia M. WittCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoWithdrawn
-
The George InstituteChanghai Hospital; University of CalgaryNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad, SpainUnknownChronic Pain | FibromyalgiaSpain
-
University of California, Los AngelesThe National Council on Aging; City of Los Angeles Department of Aging; Los Angeles...Completed
-
Queen's University, BelfastPublic Health Agency, Health and Social Care Research and Development; Tiny...Completed
-
National Taiwan University HospitalEnrolling by invitationCognitive Function | Atrial Fibrillation, PersistentTaiwan
-
Takeshi MorimotoUniversity of the RyukyusActive, not recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Hypertension | Type 2 Diabetes | DyslipidemiaJapan
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.TerminatedRefractive Error CorrectionUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompleted