Water Exchange With Narrow Band Imaging on Adenoma Detection (NBI;ADR;WE)

February 25, 2024 updated by: Yuqi He

PLA Army General Hospital of Beijing

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cause of death from cancer worldwide. The adenoma detection rate is correlated with quality of colonoscopy and risk of postcolonoscopy CRC. Low quality of bowel preparation with fecal residue and brown liquid in the colon may lower the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Optimal bowel preparation and novel approaches for colonoscopy increases the effectiveness of colonoscopic examination to improve ADR are desirable. Water exchange, which significantly increased colon cleanliness both in the right colon and the entire colon, is characterized by insertion to the cecum in clear water in lieu of gas insufflations. Water exchange led to an increase in ADR, particularly for the improvement in the right colon, providing adequate bowel preparation.

NBI is an innovative imaging technology which efficiency for the early detection of superficial cancers in the head and neck region and the esophagus had been reported previously. In the colorectal region, different results have been reported for improvement in the adenoma detection rate of NBI compared with that of WLI. All procedures were performed up to the cecum by using a high-definition colonoscope (GIF-HQ290I; Olympus Optical ) However, whether NBI in high-definition colonoscope can increase the ADR after water exchange insertion, remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was therefore to determine whether the use of NBI system as an adjunct to water exchange insertion would improve the ADR

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Design: Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to control group or study group through a computer-based randomization list by a technician. See also inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Colonoscopy was performed using high-definition colonoscope (GIF-HQ290I) after bowel preparation. Experienced endoscopists (each with over 3000 colonoscopies performed) and fellows (performed more than 600 colonoscopies) performed all procedures. During the insertion phase, air pump was turned off to avoid inadvertent insufflations. Water exchange with infusion pump was used to open the lumen and simultaneous suction of infused water to allow passage of the scope in clear water. Suction of water can maximize cleanliness and minimize distension. Air pockets at any location of the lumen were always aspirated. In a collapsed colon, water turbulence formation at the tip of the scope facilitates residual feces removal, salvage cleansing also be provided during insertion. Simethicone was used to remove bubbles over the mucosa. Cecal intubation was defined as the passage of the scope tip beyond the ileocecal valve with visualization of the cecal appendix. After cecal intubation, as much residual water as possible was aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. The same endoscopist uses the same assigned method to perform tandem or back-to-back colonoscopy on all patients. After the first colonoscopic examination with the colonoscope removed from the anus, using the same entry method for insertion and the same assigned method for the second colon examination. In all arms, withdrawal lasted at least 9 minutes and was done using air insufflation to obtain adequate distension. A stopwatch was used to time the procedures, and time for polypectomy was not included.

Colon cleanliness was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and bubble scores. Cardiopulmonary function was monitored throughout, and adverse outcomes were recorded.

Study end points The primary outcome was to compare the ADR of the 290-NBI with the HD-WL. Secondary outcomes included Right and left colon Adenoma Detection Rate. Right and left colon <10 mm Adenoma Detection Rate. Mean adenomas resected per procedure. Cecal intubation rate. Cecal intubation time. Total withdrawal time. Amount of water used during the procedure. Adenoma and polyp miss rate between the two group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: yuqi he, doctor
  • Phone Number: +801066721299
  • Email: endohe@163.com

Study Locations

    • Dongcheng District
      • Beijing, Dongcheng District, China, 100700
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital
        • Contact:
          • yuqi he

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Any patient ≥40 and <85 who underwent colonoscopy, does not meet exclusion criteria mentioned below and provide written informed consent will be eligible for enrolment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • (1) history of inflammatory bowel disease;(2) familial adenomatous polyposis; (3) hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome; (4) personal history of colorectal cancer or had previous colonic resection; (5) haemodialysis; (6) an American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III or higher; (7) antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy 5 days before the procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: WL withdrawal method
Active Comparator: WL was used on withdrawal. During the insertion phase, air pump was turned off to avoid inadvertent insufflations. Water exchange with infusion pump was used to open the lumen and simultaneous suction of infused water to allow passage of the scope in clear water. Withdrawal phase done using air insufflation.
The newly available second generation of NBI using the 290 system (290-NBI) provides an at least twofold brighter image compared with the previous version
Other Names:
  • Water exchange
Experimental: NBI withdrawal method
Experimental: NBI was used on withdrawal. During the insertion phase, air pump was turned off to avoid inadvertent insufflations. Water exchange with infusion pump was used to open the lumen and simultaneous suction of infused water to allow passage of the scope in clear water. Withdrawal phase done using air insufflation.
The newly available second generation of NBI using the 290 system (290-NBI) provides an at least twofold brighter image compared with the previous version
Other Names:
  • Water exchange

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adenoma and polyp Detection Rate between the 290-NBI and the HD-WL group
Time Frame: 6 months
Overall ADR detection rate
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Right and left colon Adenoma Detection Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
ADR detection rate at different location
6 months
Right and left colon <10 mm Adenoma Detection Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
small polyp detection rate
12 months
Mean adenomas resected per procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number of adenomas resected per subject
6 months
Total withdrawal time
Time Frame: 6 months
Total procedure time (including time required for polyp resection or biopsy)
6 months
Amount of water used during the procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Amount of water used during insertion and withdrawal
6 months
adenoma and polyp miss rate between the two groups
Time Frame: 6 months
lesion miss rate
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: tianyang zhang, Medical department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PLA GH-water exchange-ADR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

After the research has been finished

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates

Clinical Trials on NBI withdrawal method

3
Subscribe