Evaluation of Survival of Mature Second Premolar Treated With Regenerative Techniques

September 23, 2016 updated by: Wagih Tarek Ali, Cairo University

Evaluation of Survival of Mature Second Premolar With Periapical Lesion Following Different Regenerative Treatment Protocols

This study aims to compare the ability of different regenerative protocols in the treatment of mature necrotic

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

American Dental Association adopted the tissue engineering concept and pulp regeneration in 2009. Regeneration was focused on the treatment of immature necrotic teeth so as to allow root completion, improving both the functionality and durability of the affected tooth. Utilizing a blood clot in the affected tooth with immature roots was very beneficial, as it acts as a scaffold for the migration of stem cells and morphogens to allow regeneration .

Based on the success of pulp regeneration in treating immature teeth, ambitious dentists started to look forward on regenerating the pulp of mature teeth as a substitution to the conventional root canal treatment. On the other hand, lots of clinicians were very doubtful about treating mature teeth with the same protocol, as the small apical foramen might not provide a good portal for the entry of stem cells and growth factors, which in turn is very important for the success of pulp regeneration.Doubts in treating mature apex encouraged researchers to look for an alternative to the stem cells other than the apical papilla, from this concept the idea for using an alternative source of stem cells and growth factors as platelet rich plasma (PRP) emerged. The use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) as a potentially ideal scaffold for regenerative endodontic therapy has been reported in the treatment of immature teeth. However, the use of bovine thrombin for the activation of PRP has been an issue of controversy, as it requires non autologous anticoagulant known to hinder the process of pulp regeneration.

This led to the development of the second generation, platelet concentrate known as Choukroun's platelet rich fibrin (PRF) which is totally autologous in nature. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) was very promising, but it is debatable whether to use PRP or PRF.The objective of this study is to evaluate novel regenerative techniques, utilizing platelet rich plasma and platelet rich fibrin in treatment of second premolar teeth with necrotic pulp, mature apex, and periapical lesion. This is a trial to prolong the survival of the affected tooth, and to aid in complete healing of periapical lesion, and to regain pulp vitality and sensitivity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are free from any physical or mental handicapping condition with no underlying systemic diseases.

Non-pregnant females Single canalled second premolar

  • Patients having non-vital, mature, second premolar teeth, radiographic evidence of periapical lesion.
  • Positive patient/Guardian compliance for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any known sensitivity or adverse reactions to medicaments or pharmaceuticals necessary to complete the trial.

Non-restorable coronal portion of teeth involved in the trial. Vital teeth Immature teeth Traumatized teeth Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption. Any criterion, not mentioned in the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group A
prp revascularization
platelet rich plasma
PLATELET RICH FIBRIN
Experimental: group B
treatment of affected teeth using platelet rich fibrin by applying prf in steril root canal
platelet rich plasma
PLATELET RICH FIBRIN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: 1 year
how long will the tooth survive after treatment, testing the durability of tooth
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
healing
Time Frame: 1 year
measuring the density of lesion using the cone beam CT
1 year
vitality
Time Frame: 1 year
after how many days will the tooth respond normaly to stimulus
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 year
after how many days will the tooth respond positively to electric pulp tester
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: wagih ali, ass lecturer, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2016-09-203

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carious Teeth

Clinical Trials on PRP

3
Subscribe