Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Stress Response and Emergence Agitation During Laparoscopic Surgery

January 3, 2017 updated by: MOHAMED F. MOSTAFA, Assiut University

Effect of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine on Stress Response and Emergence Agitation After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Adults

Emergence agitation is a post-anesthetic phenomenon that develops in the early phase of general anesthesia recovery, and is characterized by agitation, confusion, disorientation, and possible violent behavior. The incidence of emergence agitation is less common in adults as compared to pediatric patients. It may lead to serious consequences for the patient such as bleeding, falling, removal of catheters and self extubation, which lead to further complications like hypoxia and aspiration.

Despite its common occurrence, unclear etiology, and serious sequelae, emergence agitation has rarely been studied in adults.

The stress response to surgery is an unconscious response to tissue injury. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system, increase of catabolic hormone release and pituitary gland suppression are considered a response to surgical stress, in clinical practice these activities cause changes in heart rate, blood pressure and biochemical fluctuations of noradrenaline, adrenaline, dopamine, and cortisol. Above all, these fluctuations prolong hospitalization and delay patients discharge.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist having sedative, analgesic and sympatholytic properties. Decreased stress response to surgery ensuring a stable hemodynamic state is a beneficial property of the agent. Peri-operative use of dexmedetomidine also decreases postoperative opioid consumption, pain intensity, and antiemetic therapy. However, the data related to the effects of dexmedetomidine on reducing agitation from general anesthesia in adults are limited.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

With no premedication, all patients will have pre-oxygenation for 3-5 minutes and intravenous access will be secured. NaCl 0.9% 4 ml/kg/h will be infused intraoperatively. General anesthesia will be induced by fentanyl 1 ug/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg and nimbex (cisatracurium) 0.15 mg/kg. Endotracheal intubation then will be done using oral ETT of appropriate size under direct laryngoscopy and secured at the angle of the mouth. Sevoflurane inhalational anesthetic (2-4 %) and nimbex 0.03 mg/kg will be used for maintenance of anesthesia. The lungs will be mechanically ventilated to keep intra-operative EtCo2 between 35-40 mmHg.

Intraoperative monitoring:

Routine monitors including ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oxymetry and EtCo2 will be recorded every 5 minutes during the intra-operative 20 minutes of the study drug administration. Bradycadia (heart rate ˂ 60 beat/minute) will be treated with iv atropine 0.5 mg. Hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure ˂ 60 mmHg) will be treated with iv ephedrine 5 mg increments. Duration of anesthesia, sevoflurane % and duration of surgery will be recorded.

At the end of surgery and stoppage of sevoflurane inhalation, neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg and atropine 0.02 mg/kg will be used for muscle relaxant reversal (Time 0 in the emergence process), patients will be extubated and transferred to the PACU for recovery and monitoring.

Assessment in PACU:

Routine monitoring will be continued during staying in PACU. During emergence, the level of agitation will be evaluated using the Ricker sedation-agitation scale (RSAS). The maximum level of agitation will be recorded for each patient at time 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes. Emergence agitation was defined as any score on the sedation-agitation scale ≥ 5. Dangerous agitation was defined as a sedation-agitation scale score = 7 (3). If dangerous agitation occurs, it will be treated with fentanyl 1 ug/kg.

Duration of stay in PACU will be recorded. Criteria for discharge from PACU will be applied according to the modified Aldrete scoring system. A score ≥ 9 was required for discharge.

Postoperative Analgesia:

The 10 points Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain measurement will be used to assess the severity of postoperative pain. Score 0 indicates no pain and score 10 indicates severe pain. If VAS ≥ 4, rescue analgesia will be indicated. Perfalgan infusion will be used as supplemental analgesia. The first dose and the total amount in 24 hours of perfalgan will be recorded. Patient's satisfaction will be recorded at the end of the first 24 hours postoperatively.

Blood Sampling:

Venous blood samples will be collected from peripheral extremities away from the intravenous infused limb. Samples will be withdrawn 30 minutes pre-operatively, 30 minutes after skin incision, 2 and 24 hours after end of surgery. The blood samples will be centrifuged at 3500 ×g for at least 10 minutes and then serum samples will be eluted. Blood glucose level will be also recorded at the same times.

Statistical Analysis:

Statistical analysis will be conducted with SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows. The results will be expressed as mean ± SD, range, percentage. P-values < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Assiut University hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I - II Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cardiac disease, diabetes. reactive upper airway disease. allergies to dexmedetomidine. cognitive disorders. renal insufficiency. hepatic dysfunction. Chronic use of analgesics, cortisone or drugs known to interact with dexmedetomidine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine 1
patients will receive dexmedetomidine 1 mic/kg
Group I will receive 1 ug/kg, group II will receive 0.75 ug/kg and group III will receive 0.5 ug/kg) diluted to 50 ml NaCl 0.9% by syringe pump over 20 minutes before end of surgery.
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine 0.75
patients will receive dexmedetomidine 0.75 mic/kg
Group I will receive 1 ug/kg, group II will receive 0.75 ug/kg and group III will receive 0.5 ug/kg) diluted to 50 ml NaCl 0.9% by syringe pump over 20 minutes before end of surgery.
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine 0.5
patients will receive dexmedetomidine 0.5 mic/kg
Group I will receive 1 ug/kg, group II will receive 0.75 ug/kg and group III will receive 0.5 ug/kg) diluted to 50 ml NaCl 0.9% by syringe pump over 20 minutes before end of surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum cortisol level
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperative
serum cortisol level will be measured at 2 hours postoperative
2 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post anesthetic emergence agitation
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperative
RSAS score will be measured 2 hours postoperative
2 hours postoperative
visual analogue score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
perfalgan will be given when visual analogue score ≥ 4
24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hamdy Yossef, MD, Assiut University, Faculty of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe