Speed of Processing Training in Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Older Adults

March 22, 2018 updated by: Amy Amara, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

The Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Pedestrian Behavior in Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Older Adults

The purpose of this prospective, within-subject randomized cross-over design study is to determine if a computer training program (Speed of Processing Training - SOPT) improves safe pedestrian behavior in patients with Parkinson's disease and in healthy older adults in a virtual reality pedestrian environment. Pedestrian injury poses significant risk to healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson's disease. Several age-related changes, including slowing of visual processing speed, increase risky pedestrian behavior. This study will determine if SOPT improves pedestrian behavior in patients with Parkinson's disease and healthy older adults and evaluate the persistence of the SOPT training effects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Pedestrian injury poses significant risk to healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson's disease. Several age-related changes, including slowing of visual processing speed, increase risky pedestrian behavior. Persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) are at even higher risk of pedestrian injury due to motor and non-motor symptoms. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor symptoms including slowness, tremor, stiffness, and balance problems. Visual processing speed abnormalities, anxiety, and cognitive problems are common non-motor symptoms.

The Useful Field of View (UFOV®) test is a measure of visual processing speed. The UFOV® test is performed on a touch-screen computer that displays objects in the central and peripheral visual fields for brief durations. Successful performance on the test requires integration of visual sensory information and higher-order cognitive processing. Our own research has shown that the UFOV® test performance correlates with pedestrian behavior in PD patients.

Speed of Processing Training (SOPT) is a computer-based training that uses visual exercises to improve cognitive processing. The training involves identifying and localizing visual information quickly in increasingly demanding visual displays. SOPT has been demonstrated to improve performance on the UFOV test in healthy older adults and PD patients. It is hypothesized that SOPT training will improve pedestrian safety in healthy older adults and PD patients.

In the proposed study, we will use a within-subject, randomized, controlled, cross-over design to evaluate if a computer training program (Speed of Processing Training - SOPT) improves safe pedestrian behavior in patients with Parkinson's disease and in healthy older adults in a virtual reality pedestrian environment and if the effects of training persist long-term.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria Parkinson's disease Subjects:

  • Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease based on the presence of bradykinesia and one or both of the following: rest tremor and/or rigidity
  • On stable medications for at least 4 weeks prior to entering the study and expected to not need any medication changes for the duration of the study
  • Age ≥50 at the time of entry into the study
  • Age of onset of Parkinson's disease 45 - 85 years old
  • Asymmetric onset of PD
  • Progressive motor symptoms of PD
  • Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-4
  • Ability to walk up and down a single stair step
  • Access to a computer with internet

Exclusion Criteria Parkinson's disease Subjects:

  • Atypical features indicative of a Parkinson's Plus disorder (Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Multiple Systems Atrophy, Corticobasal Degeneration) including cerebellar signs, supranuclear gaze palsy, apraxia, prominent autonomic failure, or other cortical signs.
  • Neuroleptic treatment at time of onset of Parkinsonism
  • Active treatment with a neuroleptic at time of study entry
  • History of multiple strokes with stepwise progression of Parkinsonism
  • History of multiple head injuries
  • Inability to walk without assistance, including a cane, wheelchair, or walker
  • Cognitive dysfunction that would prevent subject's ability to perform virtual reality simulation, speed of processing training, or complete questionnaire
  • Blindness
  • Any medical condition that, based on discretion of the PI, would prevent the subject's ability to participate in the study

Inclusion Criteria Control Subjects:

  • Age ≥50 at the time of entry into the study
  • On stable medications for at least 4 weeks prior to entering the study and expected to not need any medication changes for the duration of the study
  • Ability to walk up and down a single stair step
  • Access to a computer with internet

Exclusion criteria Control Subjects:

  • Parkinson's disease or other neurodegenerative disorder
  • Inability to walk without assistance, including a cane, wheelchair, or walker
  • Cognitive dysfunction that would prevent subject's ability to perform virtual reality simulation, speed of processing training, or complete questionnaires
  • Blindness
  • Any medical condition that, based on the discretion of the PI, would prevent the subject's ability to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Initial Training Group
Healthy Controls will receive initial SOPT training and will be compared against controls in the delayed training group and the PD subjects in the initial training group
This is a game-like program designed based on the UFOV. It consists of five activities (Sweep Seeker, Bird Safari, Jewel Diver, Master Gardener, and Road Tour). The duration of training will be 3 months. Participants will be encouraged to train at least three-times weekly for 1-hour blocks and must complete at least 20 training sessions over the course of the three months.
Other Names:
  • InSight (registered trademark of Posit Science, Inc.)
Active Comparator: Control Delayed Training Group
Healthy Controls will receive delayed SOPT training and will be compared against controls in the initial training group and the PD subjects in the delayed training group
This is a game-like program designed based on the UFOV. It consists of five activities (Sweep Seeker, Bird Safari, Jewel Diver, Master Gardener, and Road Tour). The duration of training will be 3 months. Participants will be encouraged to train at least three-times weekly for 1-hour blocks and must complete at least 20 training sessions over the course of the three months.
Other Names:
  • InSight (registered trademark of Posit Science, Inc.)
Other: PD Initial Training Group
PD subjects will received initial SOPT training and will be compared against PD subjects in the delayed training group and the control subjects in the initial training group
This is a game-like program designed based on the UFOV. It consists of five activities (Sweep Seeker, Bird Safari, Jewel Diver, Master Gardener, and Road Tour). The duration of training will be 3 months. Participants will be encouraged to train at least three-times weekly for 1-hour blocks and must complete at least 20 training sessions over the course of the three months.
Other Names:
  • InSight (registered trademark of Posit Science, Inc.)
Other: PD Delayed Training Group
PD subjects will receive delayed SOPT training and will be compared against PD subjects in the initial training group and the control subjects in the delayed training group
This is a game-like program designed based on the UFOV. It consists of five activities (Sweep Seeker, Bird Safari, Jewel Diver, Master Gardener, and Road Tour). The duration of training will be 3 months. Participants will be encouraged to train at least three-times weekly for 1-hour blocks and must complete at least 20 training sessions over the course of the three months.
Other Names:
  • InSight (registered trademark of Posit Science, Inc.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to contact
Time Frame: 3 months
Difference in time to contact between baseline and immediate post-training assessments in PD and healthy controls
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Useful Field of View (UFOV)
Time Frame: 3 months
Difference in UFOV total score between baseline and immediate post-training assessments in PD and healthy controls
3 months
Executive function (MoCA, Trails, Stroop)
Time Frame: 3 months
Difference in MoCA, Trails, and Stroop between baseline and immediate post-training assessments in PD and healthy controls
3 months
Vigilance
Time Frame: 3 months
Differences in vigilance as measured by psychomotor vigilance task between baseline and immediate post-training assessments in PD and healthy controls
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy Amara, MD, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Speed of processing training (SOPT)

3
Subscribe