The Prehabilitation Study: Exercise Before Surgery to Improve Patient Function in People

June 5, 2020 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

The rapid aging of the population means that anesthesiologists care for elderly patients with increasing regularity. Although age is an independent predictor for adverse postoperative outcomes, significant outcome variation exists among older surgical patients. Frailty, a syndrome that describes an aggregate susceptibility to adverse health outcomes due to age-, and disease-related deficits that accumulate across multiple domains is a key predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes in elderly patients. Frail surgical patients are at increased risk of complications, institutionalization, death, and are high healthcare resource users.

Multiple stakeholders, including anesthesiologists and patients, have identified improving the outcomes of older patients and preoperative exercise training (prehabilitation) as 2 of the 10 most important areas for future perioperative research. Physical vulnerability is an important aspect of the frailty syndrome, and may be amenable to structured exercise therapy. However, the evidence for preoperative exercise training (prehabilitation) improving postoperative outcomes is obscured by methodological limitations and a focus on non-elderly patients. Recently, evidence has emerged that older and sicker patients may benefit most from prehab, however, this hypothesis has not been formally tested.

Because the complex needs of frail perioperative patients require a longitudinal and multidisciplinary approach, the investigators are developing a perioperative surgical home for the frail elderly (PSH-Frail). Development of the PSH-Frail is supported by a robust data collection system, including linkage of prospectively collected data to health administrative data infrastructure to improve efficiency and long-term follow up.

The investigators hypothesize that prehabilitation will be a vital intervention supported by the PSH frail, however, high quality evidence from randomized trials is needed to support its efficacy. Therefore, the investigators propose a single center randomized controlled trial of prehabilitation of frail elderly patients having elective abdominal and thoracic cancer surgery to improve postoperative function (primary outcome), and to decrease postoperative resource utilization (secondary outcomes).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Frailty is a key risk factor for adverse outcomes among the increasingly large number of older patients presenting for surgery. The complexity and risk profile of frail patients makes them a population who may derive significant benefit from the multidisciplinary and continuous care provided by a Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) model of care. Development of an evidence-based PSH for the frail elderly (PSH-Frail) is the overarching goal of the investigator's research program. However, the PSH-Frail is a complex intervention, and will require high quality evidence to support inclusion of specific processes and interventions into the overall framework.

To date, the investigator's research group has undertaken prospective studies to support the routine and accurate identification of frail patients before surgery. The next step in the development of the PSH-Frail is testing interventions to improve the outcomes of frail elderly surgical patients. The role of preoperative exercise training (prehabilitation) in improving postoperative outcomes is a priority research area in perioperative medicine, and may provide its most significant impact in frail elderly patients. However, this hypothesis has not been formally tested.

Study design:

A single center, parallel arm randomized controlled trial of home-based prehabilitation vs. standard perioperative care in frail elderly patients undergoing elective surgery for intraabdominal cancer will be conducted. This will be a superiority trial to test the hypothesis that home-based prehabilitation will result in improved postoperative functional outcomes compared to standard care. This protocol is described in keeping with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines).

Study setting:

This study will be performed at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH), a 900-bed tertiary care academic health sciences center serving a catchment area of 1.2 million people. TOH is the regional cancer referral center for the Eastern portion of the Canadian province of Ontario. On average, cancer patients are seen 4 weeks prior to surgery (as this is a provincial benchmark for cancer care).

Sample size:

To detect a clinically important 25 meter difference in the primary outcome between study arms, using a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance with 80% power, and assuming a standard deviation of 55 meters based on a previously published trial, we will require 77 patients per arm. To account for up to 20% attrition we will enroll 100 patients per arm.

Recruitment:

Patients will be recruited from the investigator's hospital's Cancer Assessment Center. Following cancer diagnosis, patients are seen by a surgeon 4 weeks prior to their scheduled operation. Following surgical assessment and confirmation of the decision to operate, patients who consent to consideration for research contact, and who meet all inclusion criteria except for frailty score, will be assessed by a trained clinician or clinical assistant using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Patients who score >4/9 on the CFS will then be randomized after providing written informed consent.

Intervention:

The intervention will be a home-based total-body exercise training program (henceforth referred to as prehabilitation) based on a protocol with proven efficacy in improving the function of non-frail surgical patients in less than 4 weeks of preoperative utilization. Prehabilitation will consist of 3 components: 1) strength training; 2) aerobic exercise and 3) flexibility. Prehabilitation will be prescribed as 1-hour sessions performed a minimum of 3 times per week.

Control:

Patients randomized to the control group will be provided standard perioperative care as per institutional standards. Patients will receive the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Recommendations for Physical Activity for Health for people 65 years and above pamphlet, as well as Canada's Food Guide. In-hospital perioperative care, and postoperative care, will be at the discretion of each patient's surgeon and anesthesiologist.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

204

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 60 years or older
  • scheduled to undergo elective surgery for intraabdominal or thoracic cancer
  • diagnosed with frailty based on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS; score of >4/9 defines frailty)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cannot communicate in written or oral form in official languages serviced by TOH (English or French)
  • unwilling to participate in home-based prehabilitation
  • major cardiac risk factors
  • scheduled to undergo surgery in fewer than 3 weeks from randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prehabilitation Group
The intervention will be a home-based total-body exercise training program (prehabilitation) based on a protocol with proven efficacy in improving the function of non-frail surgical patients in less than 4 weeks of preoperative utilization.Prehabilitation will consist of 3 components: 1) strength training; 2) aerobic exercise and 3) flexibility. Prehabilitation will be prescribed as 1-hour sessions performed a minimum of 3 times per week. Intervention group patients will also be provided with nutritional advice. In addition to paper-based materials outlining the prehabilitation program, weekly prehabilitation teaching sessions will be held at our Cancer Centre for patients randomized to the intervention group, and activity logs and weekly phone calls will be used to measure compliance and to answer questions. During the final week of the program, patients will also participate in a brief qualitative interview over the phone to explore their experience with the program.

Strength training: This component consists of 1 set of 10 repetitions of each exercise: a. push-ups (modified to the individual's level of function as either wall push-ups, knee push-ups, or full push-ups); b. seated row (performed with an elastic resistance band); c. chest fly (performed with an elastic resistance band); d. deltoid lift (performed with an elastic resistance band); e. biceps curls (performed with an elastic resistance band); f. triceps extensions (performed with an elastic resistance band); g. chair squats; h. hamstring curls; i. standing calf raises; j. abdominal crunches (modified to be performed seated in a chair)

Aerobics: Walking for 20 minutes at moderate intensity.

Flexibility: Chest, arm, leg and truck stretches, with each stretch to be held for 20 seconds, done for 2 repetitions.

No Intervention: Control Group
Patients randomized to the control group will be provided standard perioperative care as per our institutional standards. They will receive the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Recommendations for Physical Activity for Health for people 60 years and above pamphlet, as well as Canada's Food Guide. In-hospital perioperative care, and postoperative care, will be at the discretion of each patient's surgeon and anesthesiologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative functional capacity
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
Functional capacity at baseline (surgical assessment typically 4 weeks prior to surgery) compared to postoperative functional capacity 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome of this study will be postoperative functional capacity, specifically the 6-minute walk test 30 days after surgery. A clinically relevant difference in this outcome is a change of 25 meters walked over 6 minutes.
30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Mobility
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
Functional outcomes will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).This is a validated, objective assessment, developed by National Institute on Ageing, to evaluate lower extremity functioning in older individuals through assessment of balance, gait speed and lower limb functional strength; each domain is assessed on a 4-point scale, and the overall performance is rated on a cumulative 12-point scale. Participants will complete this at baseline (surgical assessment typically 4 weeks prior to surgery) and at their post-operative surgical follow-up (approximately 30 days after surgery).
30 days after surgery
Patient-reported health outcomes and adverse events: Health Related Quality of Life - health state
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Measured using the EQ-5D30 (5-level version). The EQ-5D assesses domains of self-perceived mobility, self-care, usual activity participation, pain/discomfort, and anxiety depression which is captured as a overall health state score.
30 and 90 days after surgery
Patient-reported health outcomes and adverse events: Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Measured using the EQ-5D30 (5-level version). The EQ-5D also uses a self-report 0-100 point scale relating the person's current health status to their best imaginable status
30 and 90 days after surgery
Patient-reported health outcomes and adverse events: Disability Free Survival
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Measured using the WHODAS 2.0 instrument, a 30-day look-back multidimensional disability scale that is validated in a variety of disease states, including postoperatively.
30 and 90 days after surgery
Patient-reported health outcomes and adverse events: Adverse Events
Time Frame: Within 365 days after surgery
Based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program definitions for medical complications, the type of medical complication will be collected.
Within 365 days after surgery
Patient-reported health outcomes and adverse events: Adverse Events
Time Frame: Within 365 days after surgery
Based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program definitions for surgical complications, the type of surgical complication will be collected.
Within 365 days after surgery
Patient-reported health outcomes and adverse events: Adverse Events
Time Frame: Within 365 days after surgery
The number of participants who experience all-cause mortality will be collected.
Within 365 days after surgery
Healthcare resource utilization: hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Within 365 days after surgery
Number of days in hospital post-operatively
Within 365 days after surgery
Healthcare resource utilization: proportion of patients discharged to an institution, readmissions within 30 days of discharge
Time Frame: Within 365 days after surgery
Number of patients discharged to an institution and/or re-admitted post-operatively
Within 365 days after surgery
Healthcare resource utilization: total healthcare costs
Time Frame: Within 365 days after surgery
Amount of healthcare dollars spent will be generated using a validated algorithm in our administrative data
Within 365 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel I McIsaac, MD, The Ottawa Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20160091

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe