Topical Proparacaine Eye Drops to Improve the Experience of Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections

April 11, 2023 updated by: Mayo Clinic
The specific aims of this study are to compare patient experience with and without a proparacaine drop after povidone iodine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To ensure the extra drop does not interfere with antisepsis, conjunctival cultures will be obtained from patients undergoing intravitreal injection before and after the application of the extra eye drop. Patients will be randomized to undergo additional topical analgesia during intravitreal injection vs. the standard amount of topical analgesia. Cultures of the eyelid/conjunctiva will be taken to ensure that the additional topical analgesia does not interfere with antisepsis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55901
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing intravitreal injection who do not have active eye infections
  • greater than 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients younger than 18 years of age
  • patients with active eye infections

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard procedure + Culture
Patients will undergo the standard injection protocol. A conjunctival culture will then be obtained followed by the application of povidone-iodine to the eyelashes and eyelid margins. Patients will be randomized to receive 5% povidone-iodine drop to the conjunctival surface followed by conjunctival culture then re-application of 5% povidone-iodine drop to the conjunctival surface. Injection will then proceed.
Conjunctival cultures will be performed to ensure that the intervention does not interfere with antisepsis.
Experimental: Proparacaine + Culture
Patients will undergo the standard injection protocol. A conjunctival culture will then be obtained followed by the application of povidone-iodine to the eyelashes and eyelid margins. Patients will undergo application of another drop of topical anesthetic followed by conjunctival culture. After the culture, this group of patients will have 5% povidone iodine applied to the conjunctival surface. Intravitreal injection will then proceed.
Conjunctival cultures will be performed to ensure that the intervention does not interfere with antisepsis.
Extra proparacaine will be applied to the conjunctival surface to determine its role in patient experience.
Other Names:
  • alcaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Study Participants With Positive Conjunctival Culture
Time Frame: pre-injection
Conjunctival samples were collected after participants received either an additional drop of proparacaine or povidone iodine. Bacterial cultures were performed from conjunctival samples by the Mayo Clinic Microbiology laboratory. Bacterial species identification was performed on any and all bacteria that grew.
pre-injection
Pain at the Time of Injection
Time Frame: post-injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the lesser the perceived pain, the higher the score, the higher the perceived pain.
post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Residual Pain From Intravitreal Injection
Time Frame: post-injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the lesser the residual pain, the higher the score, the higher the residual pain.
post-injection
Overall Impression of Visit for Intravitreal Injection
Time Frame: post-injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the more positive impression of the visit, the higher the score, the less positive impression of the visit.
post-injection
Impression of Pre-injection Preparations
Time Frame: post-injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey consisted of 6 questions and was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the more positive impression of the preparation process, the higher the score, the less positive impression of the preparation process..
post-injection
Comfort With Intravitreal Injection Standard Procedure
Time Frame: post-injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the more comfortable the subject was with the procedure, the higher the score, the less comfortable the subject was with the procedure.
post-injection
Expectation Intravitreal Injection Will Have Negative Consequences on Subject Health
Time Frame: post-injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. A lower score indicated subjects did not expect the injection would negatively affect their overall health. Higher scores indicated subjects expected the injection would negatively affect their overall health.
post-injection
Expectation the Injection Will Contribute to Curing/Improving Eye Condition
Time Frame: post-injection
Patients were asked to rate their expectation on the extent to which the intravitreal injections would contribute to curing or improving their eye condition. The question was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a negative response (not at all) and 10 was a positive response (to a large extent). A low score indicated the subject did not expect the injection would contribute to curing or improving the eye condition while a high score indicated the subject did expect the injection will help to cure or improve the eye condition.
post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose S Pulido, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Conjunctival culture

3
Subscribe