Fibrinolysis Compared to Thoracoscopy for Pleural Infection

December 24, 2019 updated by: Adnan Majid, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus Medical Thoracoscopy for Treatment of Pleural Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical trial is to compare two currently accepted standard-of-care treatment strategies: Medical thoracoscopy as compared to instillation of intrapleural tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA) and human recombinant Deoxyribonuclease (DNase) for the management of empyema or complex parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) in adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Pleural infection (empyema or complex parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)) represents one of the most common clinical diagnoses encountered in clinical practice in the United States (US) It is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality despite advances in medical diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Objective: Compare two standard of care treatments: TPA/DNase vs early medical Thoracoscopy

Methods: We will conduct a prospective randomized clinical trial. We plan to enroll a total of 80 patients and randomize them to either Medical Thoracoscopy group or Fibrinolytic Therapy group.

Follow-up will be daily until hospital discharge and at 6 and 12 weeks in the outpatient setting

Primary Outcome: Duration of hospital stay after intervention

Secondary Outcome: Failure rate of assigned treatment and adverse events

Potential Outcome and Benefit: Determine best strategy for treating patients with pleural infection

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects >18 years old with:
  • Evidence of empyema or complex parapneumonic effusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to give informed written consent
  • Previous thoracic surgery or thrombolytic therapy for pleural infection
  • Medical thoracoscopy cannot be performed within 48 hours
  • Hemodynamic instability or severe hypoxemia
  • Non corrected coagulopathy
  • Homogeneously echogenic effusion on pleural ultrasonography

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Thoracoscopy group
Patients randomized to the Thoracoscopy group will undergo medical thoracoscopy.
Medical thoracoscopy will be performed as per standard protocols.
Active Comparator: Fibrinolytic group
Patients randomized to the Fibrinolytic group will receive intrapleural therapy of combined tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and human recombinant deoxyribonuclease (DNase)
Patients will receive intrapleural combination of TPA (10 mg) and DNAse (5 mg). Therapy will be given twice daily for a maximum of 6 doses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of hospital stay after intervention
Time Frame: 12 week follow up period
Number of days hospitalized
12 week follow up period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days with chest drainage
Time Frame: 12 week follow up period
Number of days with chest drainage
12 week follow up period
Total length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 12 week follow up period
Total days spent in the hospital
12 week follow up period
Failure rate of assigned treatment necessitating intervention
Time Frame: 12 week follow up period

defined as any of the following:

  1. Surgical intervention (VATS, open thoracotomy) in the medical thoracoscopy or fibrinolytic therapy arm
  2. Need of additional chest tube and/or fibrinolytic therapy in the medical thoracoscopy arm due to clinical non-responsiveness
  3. Need of additional chest tube in the fibrinolytic therapy arm due to clinical non-responsiveness
12 week follow up period
Adverse events
Time Frame: 12 week follow up period
Any adverse event (pain or bleeding)
12 week follow up period
In hospital and 30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
Death of a patient while being hospitalized or up to 30 days after
30 days
Change in pleural fluid volume on Chest CT scan prior to randomization (day 0) to prior to chest tube removal measured by radiologist blinded to treatment allocation using image J software
Time Frame: 12 week follow up period
Pleural fluid volume measured with CT scan
12 week follow up period
Inflammatory biomarker (CRP) from randomization (day 0), at 6 weeks and 12 weeks respectively
Time Frame: at randomization and at 6 and12 week follow up visit
Inflammatory biomarker measure
at randomization and at 6 and12 week follow up visit
Total costs of each treatment modality
Time Frame: 6 and 12 week follow up period
Total cost of each of treatment modality
6 and 12 week follow up period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pleural Diseases

Clinical Trials on Medical Thoracoscopy

3
Subscribe