Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis

April 24, 2017 updated by: Amir Emamifar, Svendborg Hospital

Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis - Three Challenges - Consequences of the Vasculitis Process, Osteoporosis and Malignancy: A Prospective Cohort Study Protocol

The purpose of this study is to delineate the association of the 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) detected vasculitis pattern of the large vessels (PET positivity) and the clinical picture of Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)/Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) .

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) and Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) are common inflammatory conditions. The diagnosis of PMR/GCA poses many challenges since there are no specific diagnostic tests. Recent literature emphasizes the ability of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to assess global disease activity and/or inflammation burden. 18F-FDG PET/CT may lead to make diagnosis at an earlier stage than conventional imaging and assess response to therapy. With respect to the management of PMR/GCA, there are three significant areas of concern as follows: Vasculitis process/vascular stiffness, malignancy and osteoporosis.

Methods and Analysis:

Patients: All patients with the suspicion of PMR/GCR will be offered to participate in the study. The current protocol consists of 4 separate studies including: I) The association of clinical picture of PMR/GCA with PET detected vasculitis II) Evaluating validity of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for diagnosis of PMR/GCA compared to temporal artery biopsy III) Incidence of new diagnosed malignancies in patients with PMR/GCA, or PMR like syndrome with the aim of PET/CT scan and Chest X ray/Abdominal ultrasound IV) Impact of disease process as well as steroid treatment on bone mineral density, body composition and vasculitis/vascular stiffness in PMR/GCA patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Svendborg, Denmark, 5700
        • Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 93 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All new patients with clinical suspicion of PMR/GCA.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least five (A-E) components of the PMR diagnostic criteria, including:

    • A. Age ≥50 years,
    • B. Bilateral shoulder or hip pain,
    • C. Morning stiffness lasting >45 min,
    • D. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),
    • E. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP),
    • F. Disease duration >2weeks, should be met to suspect PMR.
  • For GCA following criteria's must be seen: Age > 50 years, ESR/CRP > 50, as well as at least two symptoms related to vasculitis (scalp tenderness, vision disturbances, headache (new or changed), jaw claudication, tenderness of the temporal arteria) if patients do not simultaneously have PMR. If the patient is suspected for PMR, one cranial symptom is enough to suspect GCA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Inability to communicate in Danish
  • Infections or malignancy when prednisolone is permanently unsuitable
  • Contraindication to imaging studies (allergy to contrast materials, reduced kidney function, pregnancy and Blood Sugar (BS) >8 mmol/l after 6 hours fasting)
  • Initiation of steroid treatment before the PET scan
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cumulated prednisolone dose within the first year after treatment initiation in patients with and without vasculitis in the large vessels
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient reported global visual analogue scale (VAS) in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels (positive PET)
Time Frame: One year
Patient global assessment of disease severity as measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 100, in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels detected by PET scan
One year
Physician reported visual analogue scale (VAS) in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels (positive PET)
Time Frame: One year
Physician assessment of disease severity as measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 100 in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels detected by PET scan.
One year
Patient reported pain in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels (positive PET)
Time Frame: One year
Patient assessment of pain intensity as measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 to 100, in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels detected by PET scan
One year
Morning stiffness (minute) in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels (positive PET)
Time Frame: One year
One year
Biochemistry results in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels (positive PET)
Time Frame: One year
ESR, CRP and fibrinogen
One year
Number of relapses in patients with vasculitis in the large vessels (positive PET)
Time Frame: One year
One year
Proportion of PET positivity (vasculitis in the large vessels as well as findings compatible with PMR) in patients with temporal artery biopsy positive.
Time Frame: One year
One year
Proportion of PET negativity (no signs of vasculitis in the large vessels) in patients with temporal artery biopsy negative.
Time Frame: One year
One year
Incidence of malignancies in the included patients detected by the aim of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan.
Time Frame: One year
One year
Incidence of malignancies in the included patients detected by the aim of Chest X Ray plus abdominal Ultrasound.
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on upper limb PWV
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Aortic augmentation index
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Body Mass Index
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on T score
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Z score
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Lean Body Mass
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Fat Mass
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Bone Mineral Content
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Fat Free Mass
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Fat Free Mass Index
Time Frame: One year
One year
Impact of disease process and steroid treatment on Fat Mass Index
Time Frame: One year
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Inger Marie Jensen Hansen, Phd, DMSci, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Giant Cell Arteritis

Clinical Trials on 18F-FDG PET/CT

3
Subscribe