- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02988323
Cervicovestibular Physiotherapy and Aerobic Exercise in Concussion
Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation and Aerobic Exercise in Children and Youth With Persistent Symptoms Following a Sport-related Concussion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Although awareness regarding sport-related concussion is growing, rehabilitative strategies for this commonly occuring injury have been a focus of very little research. With the exception of our pilot RCT, no RCTs to date have evaluated the efficacy of cervical spine physiotherapy in combination with vestibular rehabilitation in sport-related concussion. Current evidence has suggested positive effects of low-level aerobic exercise in youth and adults who are slow to recover following a concussion (Gagnon et al, 2016). However, low-level aerobic exercise has not yet been compared to cervicovestibular physiotherapy. A shift in clinical practice (to implement cervicovestibular physiotherapy or low level aerobic exercise) is occurring, but a direct comparison of the effects of low level aerobic exercise and multimodal physiotherapy treatment has not yet been conducted. A combination of these two forms of treatment may be more beneficial than either in isolation. Thus, the combination of physiotherapy and low level aerobic exercise treatment also requires evaluation. Identification of management strategies for individuals with persistent symptoms following concussion is urgently required to inform practice and optimize treatment strategies in this commonly occuring health problem.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary Research Question:
1. Does cervical and vestibular rehabilitation (CVPT) 1) result in a greater proportion of individuals medically cleared to return to sport (yes/no); 2) improve quality of life compared to a control group of low level aerobic exercise (LLAE) (following an 8-week intervention in individuals with persistent symptoms of dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches following concussion)?
Secondary Research Questions:
1. Does a combination of CVPT and LLAE 1) result in a greater proportion of individuals medically cleared to return to sport; 2) Improve quality of life compared to CVPT or LLAE alone (following an 8-week intervention in individuals with persistent symptoms of dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches following concussion)?
Exploratory Research Questions:
- Does cervical and vestibular rehabilitation (CVPT) result in a greater proportion of individuals medically cleared to return to sport compared to a control group of low level aerobic exercise (LLAE) (following an 8-week intervention in individuals with persistent symptoms of dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches following concussion) when stratified by subgroups based on time since injury, previous history of concussion, sex and age?
- Does a combination of CVPT and LLAE result in a greater proportion of individuals medically cleared to return to sport compared to CVPT or LLAE alone when stratified by subgroups based on time since injury, previous history of concussion, sex and age?
- What clinical characteristics predict response to treatment?
- What changes in symptoms and clinical measures of cervical and vestibular function occur with treatment?
- What changes in measures of disability, self-efficacy, neuropsychological and psychosocial function occur with treatment?
- What other factors may affect treatment outcome (i.e. medical clearance) and quality of life in youth with persisting symptoms following concussion?
METHODS:
The study design is a single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants will be recruited through the University of Calgary Acute Sport Concussion Clinic and through community sport medicine offices, family physicians and allied health in the City of Calgary and surrounding areas.
All participants will undergo an initial physiotherapy assessment at inclusion into the study. This assessment will be repeated at the time of medical clearance to return to sport (if less than 8 weeks) or at 8 weeks following initiation of treatment. Participants will be randomized into a cervicovestibular physiotherapy intervention (CVPT) group, a low level aerobic exercise group (LLAE), or a combination of cervicovestibular physiotherapy and low level aerobic exercise group (combination). All study participants will meet weekly (30 minute appointment) with a study physiotherapist for eight weeks (or until the time of medical clearance to return to sport if clearance occurs prior to 8 weeks). All groups will follow a protocol of graded exertion as per the 4th International Consensus Guidelines (Zurich 2012, McCrory et al, 2013).
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 10-18 years of age
- Diagnosed by the study sport medicine physician with a sport related concussion as per the 4th International Consensus guidelines
- Persistent symptoms of dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches (>10 days and less than one year post injury) reported on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3) at initial or follow-up visit to the study sport medicine physician
- Clinical findings suggesting cervical spine and/or vestibular involvement (i.e. limitations in cervical range of motion, positive clinical tests suggesting cervicogenic headaches, altered patterns of neuromotor control, alterations on dynamic visual acuity, dynamic balance, motion sensitivity, positive test for BPPV, etc)
Exclusion Criteria:
• Inability to participate in physical activity for a reason other than sport related concussion
- Inability to communicate in English language
- Neurodevelopmental delays
- Other orthopaedic injury affecting ability to participate
- Medication known to affect neural adaptation as they may alter the response to treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cervicovestibular Physio (CV PT)
In addition to the standard protocol of rest followed by exertion, the CV PT group will participate in a combination of cervical spine and vestibular rehabilitation as per a standardized treatment algorithm based on individual assessment findings.
This form of therapy combines treatment techniques for both the cervical spine and vestibular system that are commonly used in physiotherapy practice.
Cervical spine treatments may include neuromotor retraining, sensorimotor retraining, manual therapy, soft tissue techniques, and range of motion exercises.
Vestibular rehabilitation may include gaze stabilization, habituation, standing balance, dynamic balance and canalith repositioning maneouvers.
|
See description in CVPT arm
|
|
Experimental: Low-Level Aerobic Exercise (LLAE)
Participants will exercise at 60% maximum heart rate for 15 minutes.
This heart rate will be calculated by taking 220-age (in years) and multiplying by 0.6 to determine the target heart rate while performing the low level aerobic exercise.
Aerobic exercises may include treadmill, walking or stationary cycling.
Exercise will be performed 5-6 times per week independently at home and monitored by their parents.
Individuals will be taught how to monitor their heart rate.
This protocol has previously been found to be feasible and of minimal risk to participants.
|
See description in LLAE arm
|
|
Other: Combination (LLAE and CV PT)
The combination group will complete a protocol that includes both the cervicovestibular physiotherapy and LLAE interventions described above.
As described above, the study participants will be seen once weekly by the study physiotherapist for CV PT and also complete a protocol of LLAE at home.
|
See description in LLAE and CVPT arm
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Medical Clearance to return to sport
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The primary outcomes of interest will be: 1) Medical clearance to return to sport by 8-weeks (as per the 4th International Consensus Guidelines on Concussion in Sport). Medical clearance was selected because it is the most clinically relevant measure and will reflect not only symptom resolution but also functional improvement. We have chosen to further standardize this outcome as follows to minimize risk of bias:
|
8 weeks
|
|
Pediatric Quality of Life
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds-QL): The Pediatric Quality of Life Scale (PedsQL) is a measure of quality of life that is specific to children and measures four health domains including: Physical, emotional, social and school functioning.
It is a measure that has demonstrated reliability and validity in multiple disease types in children, including traumatic brain injury.
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-2
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
K6 Scale
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
The K6 scale is a 6-item rating scale designed to assess psychological distress.
It was developed with support from the U.S. government's National Center for Health Statistics for use in the redesigned U.S. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
As described in more detail in Kessler et al. (2003), the scale was designed to be sensitive around the threshold for the clinically significant range of the distribution of nonspecific distress in an effort to maximize the ability to discriminate cases of serious mental illness (SMI) from non-cases.
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Supplemental Questions (Mrazick)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Questions related to distress about injury at the time of injury, time of assessment and belief to make a full recovery rated on a 0-10 point scale
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy questionnaire for children (Gagnon et al, 2009)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (Neck Pain)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Neck pain rating from 0-10
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (Headache)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Headache rating from 0-10
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Numeric Dizziness Rating Scale
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Dizziness rating from 0-10
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Dizziness Handicap Inventory
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Dynamic Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Clinical test of dynamic visual acuity using ETDRS
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Balance Error Scoring System
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Functional Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
10 item standardized test of dynamic balance
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Head Thrust Test
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Motion Sensitivity Test
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Cervical Flexor Endurance
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Standardized test of cervical flexor endurance measured in seconds
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Cervical Flexion Rotation Test (CFRT)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Palpation for Segmental Tenderness (PST)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
As per Schneider et al 2014, palpation for segmental tenderness in cervical spine
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Cervical Rotation Side Flexion Test
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Joint Position Error (JPE)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Walk While Talking Test
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
|
Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
As per Mucha et al, 2014
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Manual Spinal Examination (MSE)
Time Frame: Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
As per Schneider et al, 2014
|
Change from Initial assessment to 8 weeks
|
|
Actigraphy
Time Frame: Change from Initial Assessment to 8 weeks
|
Use of a waist worn activity monitor to validly measure the amount of physical activity that an individual performs throughout their day.
|
Change from Initial Assessment to 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kathryn Schneider, University Of Calgary
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Schneider KJ, Meeuwisse WH, Nettel-Aguirre A, Barlow K, Boyd L, Kang J, Emery CA. Cervicovestibular rehabilitation in sport-related concussion: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(17):1294-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093267. Epub 2014 May 22.
- McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, Cantu RC, Dvorak J, Echemendia RJ, Engebretsen L, Johnston K, Kutcher JS, Raftery M, Sills A, Benson BW, Davis GA, Ellenbogen R, Guskiewicz KM, Herring SA, Iverson GL, Jordan BD, Kissick J, McCrea M, McIntosh AS, Maddocks D, Makdissi M, Purcell L, Putukian M, Schneider K, Tator CH, Turner M. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):554-75. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.05. No abstract available.
- Gagnon I, Galli C, Friedman D, Grilli L, Iverson GL. Active rehabilitation for children who are slow to recover following sport-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2009 Nov;23(12):956-64. doi: 10.3109/02699050903373477.
- Schneider KJ, Iverson GL, Emery CA, McCrory P, Herring SA, Meeuwisse WH. The effects of rest and treatment following sport-related concussion: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;47(5):304-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092190.
- Gagnon I, Grilli L, Friedman D, Iverson GL. A pilot study of active rehabilitation for adolescents who are slow to recover from sport-related concussion. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Mar;26(3):299-306. doi: 10.1111/sms.12441. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Conc-PT-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.